Update arm implementation of DMA API to include GFP_ flags
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
From: Linux Kernel Mailing List <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:30:18 +0000
ChangeSet 1.930.8.3, 2003/01/13 10:30:18-06:00, [email protected]
Update arm implementation of DMA API to include GFP_ flags
Is this really safe? Maybe ARM needs to use GFP_ATOMIC all the time for a specific reason, such as where and how it maps the cpu side mappings of the memory?