Version Number

DISCUSSION [email protected] 2 participants 2 messages Feb 20, 2003 1 message not in the archive ACPI

Share & tools

[email protected]

author

2003-02-20 04:42 UTC #0 lore raw

Maybe there's a reason for this that's not as obvious.. but it appears as if ..._CA_VERSION wasn't updated... /proc/acpi/info still reports 20030122 (giving me a heart attacking thinking I applied the wrong patch or something).

Darren

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

Takayoshi Kochi

2003-02-20 11:11 UTC #2 lore raw

Hi,

Quoted 4 lines

Maybe there's a reason for this that's not as obvious.. but it appears as if ..._CA_VERSION wasn't updated... /proc/acpi/info still reports 20030122 (giving me a heart attacking thinking I applied the wrong patch or something).

As Andy said in the announce mail, this time updates only Linux specific part. ACPI CA (common interpreter part) is still same as 20030122. The version says ACPI CA version correctly.

Grover, Andrew worte:

Quoted 3 lines

This is a Linux-only release. The core interpreter version has not been incremented, but there are many Linux-specific updates that we wanted to make available. Linus has already pulled the changes so you can also

Thanks,
---
Takayoshi Kochi <[email protected]>