BK->CVS notify?
Hi, I was moving machines around and for the last day and a half or so the CVS trees weren't getting updated. They should be up to date as of now.
Do we need a cvs-updates mailing list which gets notified of updates or do you not care? I'd be interested in knowing how many people are using the CVS trees.
One other comment: there was concern that the incremental update would not be as good as a one pass conversion. So far, the one pass and the incremental results are identical, no exceptions. So
Signature · 2 lines
--- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
Quoted 6 lines · Larry McVoy
Hi, I was moving machines around and for the last day and a half or so the CVS trees weren't getting updated. They should be up to date as of now.
Do we need a cvs-updates mailing list which gets notified of updates or do you not care? I'd be interested in knowing how many people are using the CVS trees.
If we need(*), VGER is already running bk-commit-head and bk-commit-24 lists. Adding bk-cvs-head-nofify / bk-cvs-24-notify makes hardly detectable addition to load.
(*) I don't have opinnion, I just note about existing lists.
See: http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html
Quoted 6 lines
One other comment: there was concern that the incremental update would not be as good as a one pass conversion. So far, the one pass and the incremental results are identical, no exceptions. So
Signature · 2 lines
--- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
/Matti Aarnio