Interactivity backport to 2.4.20-ck*
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I've had numerous requests for a backport of the interactivity changes to the O(1) scheduler for the -ck* kernels. I have resisted posting my backport because people had described real problems with these patches. However it seems most, if not all of the problems are related to one patch.
I've posted a special split out patch (001_o1_int_pe_ll_030407_ck_2.4.20.patch) for ck that includes the new interactivity changes, with the one patch responsible for problems backed out. No desktop tuning patch is supposed to be necessary for this so I've removed it from the site.Note that the full -ck4 patch does not include this update. I would like some feedback from people using it before I make a more substantial update to bring out a -ck5. The patches must be applied manually in order as they're desired. I've been using them for a little while without any problems.
Get them here:
Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+kYLlF6dfvkL3i1gRAk4+AKClVUe0bhxJKSM5rls1zEfNE9TymQCglChA xheK/JrNmZUnpm14LhgKMeQ=
=/Vun
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Monday 07 April 2003 15:53, Con Kolivas wrote:
Hi Con,
Quoted 6 lines
I've had numerous requests for a backport of the interactivity changes to the O(1) scheduler for the -ck* kernels. I have resisted posting my backport because people had described real problems with these patches. However it seems most, if not all of the problems are related to one patch. Get them here:
http://kernel.kolivas.org
Why isn't this patch completely backed out from the main O(1) so we can see what is new?
ciao, Marc
Quoted 11 lines · Marc-Christian Petersen
On Monday 07 April 2003 15:53, Con Kolivas wrote:
Hi Con,
Quoted 6 lines
I've had numerous requests for a backport of the interactivity changes to the O(1) scheduler for the -ck* kernels. I have resisted posting my backport because people had described real problems with these patches. However it seems most, if not all of the problems are related to one patch. Get them here:
http://kernel.kolivas.org
Quoted 2 lines
Why isn't this patch completely backed out from the main O(1) so we can see what is new?
Yeah sure here:
http://kernel.kolivas.org/scheda3_ck4
Con
Quoted 12 lines · Con Kolivas
Quoted 11 lines · Marc-Christian Petersen
On Monday 07 April 2003 15:53, Con Kolivas wrote:
Hi Con,
Quoted 6 lines
I've had numerous requests for a backport of the interactivity changes to the O(1) scheduler for the -ck* kernels. I have resisted posting my backport because people had described real problems with these patches. However it seems most, if not all of the problems are related to one patch. Get them here:
http://kernel.kolivas.org
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Why isn't this patch completely backed out from the main O(1) so we can see what is new?
Yeah sure here:
Oops I mean here:
http://kernel.kolivas.org/scheda3_ck4.bz2
Con
On Monday 07 April 2003 16:24, Con Kolivas wrote:
Hi Con,
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Why isn't this patch completely backed out from the main O(1) so we can see what is new?
Yeah sure here:
Oops I mean here:
http://kernel.kolivas.org/scheda3_ck4.bz2
ty :) I'll take a look.
ciao, Marc
Quoted 8 lines · Con Kolivas
Quoted 3 lines
Why isn't this patch completely backed out from the main O(1) so we can see what is new?
Yeah sure here:
Is this patch supposed to be against ck3?
Josh
On Monday 07 April 2003 21:30, Josh McKinney wrote:
Hi Josh,
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Yeah sure here:
http://kernel.kolivas.org/scheda3_ck4
^^^^
Quoted 1 line
Is this patch supposed to be against ck3?
see? ;)
ciao, Marc
Quoted 8 lines · Marc-Christian Petersen
On Monday 07 April 2003 21:30, Josh McKinney wrote:
Hi Josh,
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Yeah sure here:
http://kernel.kolivas.org/scheda3_ck4
Quoted 6 lines
^^^^Quoted 1 line
Is this patch supposed to be against ck3?
see? ;)
Actually, the Makefile hunk in the patch would have one believe that it is against -ck3...
Cheers,
Nicholas
Quoted 8 lines · Nicholas Wourms
Quoted 7 lines · Marc-Christian Petersen
On Monday 07 April 2003 21:30, Josh McKinney wrote:
Hi Josh,
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Yeah sure here:
http://kernel.kolivas.org/scheda3_ck4
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
^^^^Quoted 1 line
Is this patch supposed to be against ck3?
see? ;)
Actually, the
Makefilehunk in the patch would have one believe that it is against -ck3...
It's a simple minipatch against a 2.4.20 patched with the O(1),preempt,low latency combination which didn't change in ck4.
Con