2.5.67 - reiserfs go boom.
Whilst running fsx.. (Though fsx didn't trigger any error, and is still running)..
Dave
buffer layer error at fs/buffer.c:127
Call Trace: [<c016d260>] __wait_on_buffer+0xd0/0xe0 [<c0121760>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50 [<c0121760>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50 [<c02886c8>] reiserfs_unmap_buffer+0x68/0xa0 [<c0288768>] unmap_buffers+0x68/0x70 [<c0288948>] indirect2direct+0x1d8/0x2b0 [<c0286584>] reiserfs_cut_from_item+0x3d4/0x4e0 [<c0286955>] reiserfs_do_truncate+0x265/0x520 [<c0170e12>] block_prepare_write+0x32/0x50 [<c027446a>] reiserfs_truncate_file+0x15a/0x3b0 [<c028cfc7>] journal_end+0x27/0x30 [<c0275f2c>] reiserfs_file_release+0x39c/0x600 [<c014c9bb>] check_poison_obj+0x3b/0x1b0 [<c014e934>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x124/0x170 [<c016c711>] get_empty_filp+0x51/0x100 [<c016c9a1>] __fput+0xf1/0x100 [<c016ab3a>] filp_close+0x15a/0x230 [<c01833a3>] do_fcntl+0xe3/0x1c0 [<c0182ebc>] sys_dup2+0xec/0x130 [<c010a457>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Quoted 19 lines · Dave Jones
Whilst running fsx.. (Though fsx didn't trigger any error, and is still running)..
Dave
buffer layer error at
fs/buffer.c:127Call Trace: [<c016d260>] __wait_on_buffer+0xd0/0xe0 [<c0121760>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50 [<c0121760>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50 [<c02886c8>] reiserfs_unmap_buffer+0x68/0xa0 [<c0288768>] unmap_buffers+0x68/0x70 [<c0288948>] indirect2direct+0x1d8/0x2b0 [<c0286584>] reiserfs_cut_from_item+0x3d4/0x4e0 [<c0286955>] reiserfs_do_truncate+0x265/0x520 [<c0170e12>] block_prepare_write+0x32/0x50 [<c027446a>] reiserfs_truncate_file+0x15a/0x3b0 [<c028cfc7>] journal_end+0x27/0x30 [<c0275f2c>] reiserfs_file_release+0x39c/0x600
Quoted 9 lines
[<c014c9bb>] check_poison_obj+0x3b/0x1b0 [<c014e934>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x124/0x170 [<c016c711>] get_empty_filp+0x51/0x100 [<c016c9a1>] __fput+0xf1/0x100 [<c016ab3a>] filp_close+0x15a/0x230 [<c01833a3>] do_fcntl+0xe3/0x1c0 [<c0182ebc>] sys_dup2+0xec/0x130 [<c010a457>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Gee, that looks remarkably similar to what I was getting with ext3. This happened on every boot with 2.5.67 with the base distro being Mandrake 9.1. Then, I replaced LM 9.1 with Redhat 9 and I never saw this again with 2.5.67.
buffer layer error at fs/buffer.c:127
Call Trace: [<c0148170>] __wait_on_buffer+0xe0/0xf0 [<c0117010>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50 [<c0117010>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50 [<c014a0dd>] __block_prepare_write+0x13d/0x490 [<c01821b0>] ext3_mark_inode_dirty+0x50/0x60 [<c018d1ba>] start_this_handle+0x9a/0x1c0 [<c014acc4>] block_prepare_write+0x34/0x50 [<c017f2b0>] ext3_get_block+0x0/0xb0 [<c017f962>] ext3_prepare_write+0x92/0x1b0 [<c017f2b0>] ext3_get_block+0x0/0xb0 [<c012e4d9>] generic_file_aio_write_nolock+0x359/0xa10 [<c01496bc>] __find_get_block+0x7c/0x120 [<c01815f3>] ext3_get_inode_loc+0xf3/0x1a0 [<c0181908>] ext3_read_inode+0x1f8/0x360 [<c012eca1>] generic_file_aio_write+0x71/0x90 [<c017cf14>] ext3_file_write+0x44/0xe0 [<c0146deb>] do_sync_write+0x8b/0xc0 [<c0154108>] link_path_walk+0x608/0x900 [<c018c85f>] ext3_permission+0x1f/0x30 [<c015359a>] permission+0x3a/0x40 [<c0147b15>] get_empty_filp+0x75/0xf0 [<c0154d1d>] open_namei+0x9d/0x420 [<c01460de>] dentry_open+0x16e/0x180 [<c0145f68>] filp_open+0x68/0x70 [<c0146ede>] vfs_write+0xbe/0x130 [<c0146720>] generic_file_llseek+0x0/0xd0 [<c0146fee>] sys_write+0x3e/0x60 [<c01092bb>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Steven
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hello!
Quoted 8 lines · Dave Jones
Whilst running fsx.. (Though fsx didn't trigger any error, and is still running)..
buffer layer error atfs/buffer.c:127Call Trace: [<c016d260>] __wait_on_buffer+0xd0/0xe0 [<c0121760>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50 [<c0121760>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50 [<c02886c8>] reiserfs_unmap_buffer+0x68/0xa0
Andrew Morton said "That's not a bug. It is errant debugging code." because the page is locked by us, so buffers are safe.
So I am not looking into this and hoping that somebody will fix the debugging code instead ;)
Bye,
Oleg
Quoted 21 lines · Oleg Drokin
Hello!
Quoted 10 lines · Dave Jones
Whilst running fsx.. (Though fsx didn't trigger any error, and is still running)..
buffer layer error atfs/buffer.c:127Call Trace: [<c016d260>] __wait_on_buffer+0xd0/0xe0 [<c0121760>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50 [<c0121760>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50 [<c02886c8>] reiserfs_unmap_buffer+0x68/0xa0Andrew Morton said "That's not a bug. It is errant debugging code." because the page is locked by us, so buffers are safe.
So I am not looking into this and hoping that somebody will fix the debugging code instead ;)
Quoted 11 lines
Bye,
Oleg
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Oleg, if someone doesn't do it for you in 7 days, you must do it....
errant debugging code is a bug.... when users (reasonably) think our fs has bugs, that needs to be fixed;-)
Signature · 1 line
Hans
Quoted 8 lines · Steven Cole
Quoted 2 lines · Dave Jones
Whilst running fsx.. (Though fsx didn't trigger any error, and is still running)..
Gee, that looks remarkably similar to what I was getting with ext3. This happened on every boot with 2.5.67 with the base distro being Mandrake 9.1. Then, I replaced LM 9.1 with Redhat 9 and I never saw this again with 2.5.67.
FWIW, I've seen the same thing on JFS. :^)
Signature · 2 lines
David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center