Skip to contentSkip to conversation

various filesystems on 2.5.68

benchmarks [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Apr 28, 2003

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw
Quoted 2 lines

You should benchmark us with notail option if you want it to be fair compared to less space conserving filesystems.

Thanks, I'll start using notail on reiserfs.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines

----- Create ----- ---- Delete ----
files /sec %CPU Eff /sec %CPU Eff

2.5.68-ext3        65536  10828  70.3  15395   21160  98.0  2159
2.5.68-reiserfs   131072   2935  37.3   7861    1787  25.7  6963

What is the meaning of the files parameter, and why is our number different from the other filesystems?

I'll fix that too. reiserfs has been more efficient than ext2 with a lot of files. Using less than 131072 files wasn't giving results for some tests on reiserfs.

Signature · 2 lines
Randy Hron
http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/bigbox.html