Skip to contentSkip to conversation

alternative compat_ioctl table implementation

PATCH Andi Kleen 2 participants 2 messages May 2, 2003 1 message not in the archive

lore
Share & tools
lore

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

Andi Kleen

author
#1 lore raw
Quoted 2 lines · Arnd Bergmann

Opinions?

Rather ugly. In my experience all vmlinux.lds hacks are very fragile and they break when you just look at them in the wrong way. Also when something goes wrong they are a bitch to debug. And binutils is not exactly known for not introducing bugs with new releases.

Can't you work around that gcc 2.95 bug in some other way ?

-Andi

#2 lore raw
Quoted 4 lines · Andi Kleen

Rather ugly. In my experience all vmlinux.lds hacks are very fragile and they break when you just look at them in the wrong way. Also when something goes wrong they are a bitch to debug. And binutils is not exactly known for not introducing bugs with new releases.

Ok.

Quoted 1 line

Can't you work around that gcc 2.95 bug in some other way ?

Yes. I noticed now that only the x86_64 code (from which I copied) contains the assembly version that breaks on cross-compile and the sparc64 version works fine.

	Arnd <><