Posible memory leak!?
top - 11:03:41 up 4 min, 1 user, load average: 0.12, 0.20, 0.09
Tasks: 60 total, 1 running, 58 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie Cpu(s): 8.3% user, 2.3% system, 0.0% nice, 89.4% idle Mem: 385904k total, 173996k used, 211908k free, 14244k buffers Swap: 128512k total, 0k used, 128512k free, 86732k cached
this is what the machine used to look like.
this is what happens when the machine has run for about 3 hours, and during that time I have had Netbeans and Day Of Defeat(wine) running for about 15 minutes.
top - 14:14:49 up 2:31, 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0.04, 0.01
Tasks: 60 total, 2 running, 57 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie Cpu(s): 2.7% user, 0.3% system, 0.0% nice, 97.0% idle Mem: 385904k total, 261368k used, 124536k free, 16736k buffers Swap: 128512k total, 8768k used, 119744k free, 175476k cached
if i leave the machine on, and say I start transcoding something.. the RAM would not be touched and the swap usage would shoot up to 95%.
Quoted 18 lines · you
top - 11:03:41 up 4 min, 1 user, load average: 0.12, 0.20, 0.09
Tasks: 60 total, 1 running, 58 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie Cpu(s): 8.3% user, 2.3% system, 0.0% nice, 89.4% idle
Mem: 385904k total, 173996k used, 211908k free, 14244k buffers
Swap: 128512k total, 0k used, 128512k free, 86732k cachedthis is what the machine used to look like.
this is what happens when the machine has run for about 3 hours, and during that time I have had Netbeans and Day Of Defeat(wine) running for about 15 minutes.
top - 14:14:49 up 2:31, 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0.04, 0.01
Tasks: 60 total, 2 running, 57 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie Cpu(s): 2.7% user, 0.3% system, 0.0% nice, 97.0% idle
Mem: 385904k total, 261368k used, 124536k free, 16736k buffers
Swap: 128512k total, 8768k used, 119744k free, 175476k cached
Quoted 3 lines
if i leave the machine on, and say I start transcoding something.. the RAM would not be touched and the swap usage would shoot up to 95%.
So far I see nothing abnormal. My current top:
09:51:53 up 16:40, 1 user, load average: 0.02, 0.02, 0.00 56 processes: 55 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: 0.2% user, 0.4% system, 0.0% nice, 0.0% iowait, 99.3% idle
Mem: 124616k av, 114444k used, 10172k free, 0k shrd, 4k buff
53088k active, 46836k inactiveSwap: 76792k av, 1804k used, 74988k free 53632k cached
Can you show "top b n1" (unabridged) and "cat /proc/meminfo", "cat /proc/slabinfo" of the "swap usage shoot up to 95%" event?
--
vda
Quoted 10 lines
09:51:53 up 16:40, 1 user, load average: 0.02, 0.02, 0.00 56 processes: 55 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: 0.2% user, 0.4% system, 0.0% nice, 0.0% iowait, 99.3% idle Mem: 124616k av, 114444k used, 10172k free, 0k shrd, 4kbuff 53088k active, 46836k inactive
Swap: 76792k av, 1804k used, 74988k free 53632k
cachedCan you show "top b n1" (unabridged) and "cat
/proc/meminfo", "cat/proc/slabinfo" of the "swap usage shoot up to 95%" event?
heh this is very interesting.... top b n1 reports this:
top - 10:08:24 up 16:36, 2 users, load average: 0.16, 0.19, 0.08
Tasks: 62 total, 1 running, 60 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie Cpu(s): 12.3% user, 5.1% system, 0.0% nice, 82.6% idle Mem: 385904k total, 381572k used, 4332k free, 137244k buffers Swap: 128512k total, 20012k used, 108500k free, 126168k cached
while gkrellm reports that my RAM used is 95MB. now this is interesting....
here is the /proc/meminfo:
total: used: free: shared: buffers: cached:
Mem: 395165696 389582848 5582848 0 141422592 138055680 Swap: 131596288 20623360 110972928 MemTotal: 385904 kB MemFree: 5452 kB MemShared: 0 kB Buffers: 138108 kB Cached: 127324 kB SwapCached: 7496 kB Active: 181268 kB Inactive: 132244 kB HighTotal: 0 kB HighFree: 0 kB LowTotal: 385904 kB LowFree: 5452 kB SwapTotal: 128512 kB SwapFree: 108372 kB
and here is /proc/slabinfo:
slabinfo - version: 1.1
kmem_cache 57 72 108 2 2 1 ip_conntrack 3 24 320 1 2 1 tcp_tw_bucket 0 30 128 0 1 1 tcp_bind_bucket 4 112 32 1 1 1 tcp_open_request 0 0 64 0 0 1 inet_peer_cache 0 0 64 0 0 1 ip_fib_hash 14 112 32 1 1 1 ip_dst_cache 30 40 192 2 2 1 arp_cache 3 30 128 1 1 1 urb_priv 3 59 64 1 1 1 blkdev_requests 1024 1050 128 35 35 1 dnotify_cache 125 169 20 1 1 1 file_lock_cache 7 42 92 1 1 1 fasync_cache 1 202 16 1 1 1 uid_cache 1 112 32 1 1 1 skbuff_head_cache 128 220 192 11 11 1 sock 117 145 768 26 29 1 sigqueue 0 29 132 0 1 1 kiobuf 0 0 64 0 0 1 cdev_cache 19 59 64 1 1 1 bdev_cache 6 59 64 1 1 1 mnt_cache 19 59 64 1 1 1 inode_cache 45164 59479 512 8497 8497 1 dentry_cache 20481 62910 128 2097 2097 1 filp 1262 1290 128 43 43 1 names_cache 0 2 4096 0 2 1 buffer_head 94915 97440 128 3248 3248 1 mm_struct 47 60 192 3 3 1 vm_area_struct 2479 2910 128 90 97 1 fs_cache 46 59 64 1 1 1 files_cache 46 54 448 6 6 1 signal_act 51 57 1344 18 19 1 size-131072(DMA) 0 0 131072 0 0 32 size-131072 0 0 131072 0 0 32 size-65536(DMA) 0 0 65536 0 0 16 size-65536 2 2 65536 2 2 16 size-32768(DMA) 0 0 32768 0 0 8 size-32768 4 4 32768 4 4 8 size-16384(DMA) 0 0 16384 0 0 4 size-16384 9 11 16384 9 11 4 size-8192(DMA) 0 0 8192 0 0 2 size-8192 5 20 8192 5 20 2 size-4096(DMA) 0 0 4096 0 0 1 size-4096 79 95 4096 79 95 1 size-2048(DMA) 0 0 2048 0 0 1 size-2048 10 14 2048 5 7 1 size-1024(DMA) 0 0 1024 0 0 1 size-1024 70 96 1024 18 24 1 size-512(DMA) 0 0 512 0 0 1 size-512 65 80 512 10 10 1 size-256(DMA) 0 0 256 0 0 1 size-256 49 75 256 4 5 1 size-128(DMA) 2 30 128 1 1 1 size-128 883 930 128 30 31 1 size-64(DMA) 0 0 64 0 0 1 size-64 2791 2891 64 49 49 1 size-32(DMA) 36 59 64 1 1 1 size-32 414 472 64 8 8 1
Quoted 7 lines · Boris Kurktchiev
heh this is very interesting.... top b n1 reports this:
top - 10:08:24 up 16:36, 2 users, load average: 0.16, 0.19, 0.08Tasks: 62 total, 1 running, 60 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie Cpu(s): 12.3% user, 5.1% system, 0.0% nice, 82.6% idle Mem: 385904k total, 381572k used, 4332k free, 137244k buffers Swap: 128512k total, 20012k used, 108500k free,126168k cached
Typical. So what makes you think kernel leaks memory?
BTW, which version of procps do you have? Mine is 2.0.10, 2.0.11 already exists.
Quoted 2 lines
while gkrellm reports that my RAM used is 95MB. now this is interesting....
gkrellm must be subtracting something from MemTotal trying to account for fact that large part of RAM is used as a cache. You may consult its source.
--
vda
Quoted 10 lines · Denis Vlasenko
Quoted 7 lines · Boris Kurktchiev
heh this is very interesting.... top b n1 reports this:
top - 10:08:24 up 16:36, 2 users, load average: 0.16, 0.19, 0.08Tasks: 62 total, 1 running, 60 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie Cpu(s): 12.3% user, 5.1% system, 0.0% nice, 82.6% idle Mem: 385904k total, 381572k used, 4332k free, 137244k buffers Swap: 128512k total, 20012k used, 108500k free,126168k cached
Typical. So what makes you think kernel leaks memory?
well the fact that before my swap was never used, and now .... I need to transcode something so I can show you how all swap is being used and non of the RAM (thus making programs run much slower, as is the case with transcode).
Quoted 2 lines
BTW, which version of procps do you have? Mine is 2.0.10, 2.0.11 already exists.
I believe I have 2.0.10.
Quoted 3 lines
gkrellm must be subtracting something from MemTotal trying to account for fact that large part of RAM is used as a cache. You may consult its source.
No... I forgot to tell it to count cache and buffers...
The kernel is miscalculating my RAM...
In reply to Denis Vlasenkook here is what dmesg shows:
384MB LOWMEM available.
then further down:
Memory: 385584k/393216k available (2010k kernel code, 7244k reserved, 597k data, 128k init, 0k highmem)
now how is the little 38.../39... possible?
and then top shows this:
Mem: 385712k total
this again is different than the others...
and finaly gkrellm is telling me that I have only 377 mb actually recognized out of the 384mb that the kernel detected above...
So the question is where does my 7mb go, why that weird 38.../39 difference and why does top report another different value.
Re: The kernel is miscalculating my RAM...
Quoted 7 lines · Boris Kurktchiev
ok here is what dmesg shows:
384MB LOWMEM available.then further down:
Memory: 385584k/393216k availablenow how is the little 38.../39... possible?
384 * 1024 * 1000 = 393216000
Signature · 4 lines
Chris Friesen | MailStop: 043/33/F10 Nortel Networks | work: (613) 765-0557 3500 Carling Avenue | fax: (613) 765-2986 Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada | email: [email protected]
Re: The kernel is miscalculating my RAM...
Quoted 10 lines · Chris Friesen
Quoted 7 lines · Boris Kurktchiev
ok here is what dmesg shows:
384MB LOWMEM available.then further down:
Memory: 385584k/393216k availablenow how is the little 38.../39... possible?
384 * 1024 * 1000 = 393216000
ahh so I am reading it wrong... ok but where is the 7mbs going? I think I amreading it right this time... and it says that it only uses 385584k as opposed to the full 393216k... btw the same thing happens with swap there are only 2mbs eaten up from it though... (I have 128mb and I get only 127mb)
Re: The kernel is miscalculating my RAM...
In reply to Chris FriesenQuoted 10 lines · Chris Friesen
Quoted 7 lines · Boris Kurktchiev
ok here is what dmesg shows:
384MB LOWMEM available.then further down:
Memory: 385584k/393216k availablenow how is the little 38.../39... possible?
384 * 1024 * 1000 = 393216000
blah someone already answered my question about the missing 7mbs... is there a doc that tell swhy the kernel reserves that much memory?
Quoted 6 lines · Boris Kurktchiev
Quoted 1 line
Typical. So what makes you think kernel leaks memory?
well the fact that before my swap was never used, and now .... I need to transcode something so I can show you how all swap is being used and non of the RAM (thus making programs run much slower, as is the case with transcode).
Well there might be problems with kernel being too swap-happy. I.e. it swaps out application pages but keeps less precious cache pages. These problems are not that easy to debug (How do one prove that kernel swaps out 'wrong' pages? What is 'wrong'? It's kind of subjective).
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
BTW, which version of procps do you have? Mine is 2.0.10, 2.0.11 already exists.
I believe I have 2.0.10.
No. 2.0.10 top printout look different:
11:44:00 up 1 day, 18:52, 1 user, load average: 0.25, 0.29, 0.23
63 processes: 60 sleeping, 3 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: 41.8% user, 3.9% system, 0.0% nice, 0.0% iowait, 54.1% idle
Mem: 124616k av, 120448k used, 4168k free, 0k shrd, 4k buff
87172k active, 18536k inactive
Swap: 76792k av, 21820k used, 54972k free 55944k cached
--
vda