Skip to contentSkip to conversation

snapshots+highmem+'md raid5'

linux-lvm Heinz J . Mauelshagen 3 participants 3 messages Jun 12, 2003 – Jun 13, 2003

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Anyone out there using MD RAID5 as physical volumes, high memory enabled (> 960m of physical memory) and snapshots under load successfully ?

Regards,
Heinz -- The LVM Guy --

*** Software bugs are stupid.
Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11
56242 Marienrachdorf Germany
[email protected] +49 2626 141200

                                                       FAX 924446

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

#1 lore raw
Quoted 3 lines · Heinz J . Mauelshagen

Anyone out there using MD RAID5 as physical volumes, high memory enabled (> 960m of physical memory) and snapshots under load successfully ?

FYI: I use MD RAID5 as physical but I had to disable the himem completely, because otherwise 1.0.7 would live-lock the entire system ...

best,
Herbert

Quoted 21 lines

Regards,
Heinz -- The LVM Guy --

*** Software bugs are stupid.
Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11
56242 Marienrachdorf Germany
[email protected] +49 2626 141200

                                                       FAX 924446

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

#2 lore raw
In reply to Heinz J . Mauelshagen
Quoted 4 lines · Heinz J . Mauelshagen

Anyone out there using MD RAID5 as physical volumes, high memory enabled (> 960m of physical memory) and snapshots under load successfully ?

It depends on your definition of successful. I'm using 2.4.18 with HIGHMEM and RAID 5 physical volumes, (and my chaining snapshot patch). Existing snapshots seem to work OK under load, but I have trouble creating the snapshots under load consistently. My problems are with xfs_fs_freeze(), xfs's fsync_dev_lockfs implementation.

I have similar problems with 2.4.19. I've run with 2.4.20, but not under load. Haven't tried 2.4.21 yet.

Dale J. Stephenson
[email protected]