Skip to contentSkip to conversation

LVM 1.0.7

linux-lvm Petro 2 participants 5 messages Jun 13, 2003 – Jun 16, 2003

lore
Share & tools
lore

Petro

author
#0 lore raw

When building the 2.4.21 kernel does one still need to apply the patches generated by LVM/1.0.7/PATCHES/Makefile?

I'm having issues with the kernel building and a lot of errors seem to be coming from the (patched) LVM stuff.

Signature · 4 lines
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, 
Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right 
answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion 
of ideas that could provoke such a question." -- Charles Babbage 
#1 lore raw
Quoted 6 lines · Petro

When building the 2.4.21 kernel does one still need to apply the patches generated by LVM/1.0.7/PATCHES/Makefile?

I'm having issues with the kernel building and a lot of errors seem to be coming from the (patched) LVM stuff.

you could try this patch ...
http://www.13thfloor.at/VServer/patches-2.4.21-c17/07_lvm-1.0.7-2.4.21pre5.patch.bz2

which actually works for me ...

hth,
Herbert

Quoted 11 lines
Signature · 10 lines
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, 
Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right 
answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion 
of ideas that could provoke such a question." -- Charles Babbage 

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
author
#2 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · Herbert Poetzl
Quoted 4 lines · Petro

When building the 2.4.21 kernel does one still need to apply the patches generated by LVM/1.0.7/PATCHES/Makefile?
I'm having issues with the kernel building and a lot of errors seem to be coming from the (patched) LVM stuff.

you could try this patch ...
http://www.13thfloor.at/VServer/patches-2.4.21-c17/07_lvm-1.0.7-2.4.21pre5.patch.bz2
which actually works for me ...

The make file halts with a
You haven't applied the rawio patch, please see the README
make: *** [check_rawio] Error 1

Which is really odd since the README in the PATCHES directory doesn't mention a rawio patch for the 2.4 series.

The 2.4.20-VFS-lock.patch fails against the "raw" (i.e. d/l'd from kernel.org kernel.

The above patch applies and builds "properly" (i.e. compiles w/out failure) against a clean linus kernel.

Signature · 4 lines
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, 
Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right 
answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion 
of ideas that could provoke such a question." -- Charles Babbage 
#3 lore raw
Quoted 6 lines · Petro
Quoted 5 lines · Herbert Poetzl
Quoted 4 lines · Petro

When building the 2.4.21 kernel does one still need to apply the patches generated by LVM/1.0.7/PATCHES/Makefile?
I'm having issues with the kernel building and a lot of errors seem to be coming from the (patched) LVM stuff.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines

you could try this patch ...
http://www.13thfloor.at/VServer/patches-2.4.21-c17/07_lvm-1.0.7-2.4.21pre5.patch.bz2
which actually works for me ...

The make file halts with a
You haven't applied the rawio patch, please see the README
make: *** [check_rawio] Error 1

let me get this straight,

you download a vanilla 2.4.21 kernel, unpack it, apply the patch mentioned above, configure it accordingly and start a kernel compile, which then breaks with the message given above?

I do not believe this, I tried it myself, and it compiled flawlessly ...

I guess I am misreading your email?

Quoted 2 lines

Which is really odd since the README in the PATCHES directory doesn't mention a rawio patch for the 2.4 series.

which readme?

Quoted 2 lines

The 2.4.20-VFS-lock.patch fails against the "raw" (i.e. d/l'd from kernel.org kernel.

raw = vanilla here?

Quoted 2 lines

The above patch applies and builds "properly" (i.e. compiles w/out failure) against a clean linus kernel.

the VFS-lock patch or the lvm patch?

Quoted 11 lines
Signature · 10 lines
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, 
Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right 
answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion 
of ideas that could provoke such a question." -- Charles Babbage 

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
author
#4 lore raw
Quoted 10 lines · Herbert Poetzl
Quoted 9 lines · Petro
Quoted 8 lines · Herbert Poetzl
Quoted 4 lines · Petro

When building the 2.4.21 kernel does one still need to apply the patches generated by LVM/1.0.7/PATCHES/Makefile?
I'm having issues with the kernel building and a lot of errors seem to be coming from the (patched) LVM stuff.

you could try this patch ...
http://www.13thfloor.at/VServer/patches-2.4.21-c17/07_lvm-1.0.7-2.4.21pre5.patch.bz2
which actually works for me ...

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines

The make file halts with a
You haven't applied the rawio patch, please see the README
make: *** [check_rawio] Error 1

let me get this straight,
you download a vanilla 2.4.21 kernel, unpack it, apply the patch mentioned above, configure it accordingly and start a kernel compile, which then breaks with the message given above?

No, sorry--the formatting of the message was really, really bad.

I downloaded the 1.0.7 stuff from Sistina, I downloaded the raw kernel, then tried to generate the patch myself.

It didn't work, however:

Quoted 6 lines

I do not believe this, I tried it myself, and it compiled flawlessly ...
I guess I am misreading your email?

Quoted 2 lines

Which is really odd since the README in the PATCHES directory doesn't mention a rawio patch for the 2.4 series.

which readme?

README, the only README in the patches directory.

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 2 lines

The 2.4.20-VFS-lock.patch fails against the "raw" (i.e. d/l'd from kernel.org kernel.

raw = vanilla here?

Yes.

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 2 lines

The above patch applies and builds "properly" (i.e. compiles w/out failure) against a clean linus kernel.

the VFS-lock patch or the lvm patch?

Your patch.

Signature · 4 lines
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, 
Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right 
answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion 
of ideas that could provoke such a question." -- Charles Babbage