[[email protected]: Please confirm your message/Bitte bestaetige Deine Nachricht]
Okay, for everyone who want to answer to the loop thread just drop [email protected] from the Cc list - just another idiots that wants mails confirmed..
----- Forwarded message from [email protected] -----
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 15:57:14 GMT
From: [email protected]
Subject: Please confirm your message/Bitte bestaetige Deine Nachricht
To: [email protected]
Die Zustellung Deiner Nachricht | Your e-mail message with the subject
mit dem Subjekt "Re: [PATCH - RFC] loop.c" | of "Re: [PATCH - RFC] loop.c" is being held ist unterbrochen, weil Deine | because your address was not Mailadresse unbekannt ist | recognized (or the -dated cookie is (oder die Zeitmarke abgelaufen). | expired).
Eine Bestaetigung ist notwendig, | A confirmation is required which womit du garantierst, dass Deine | guarantees that your message is Nachricht legitim und keine | legitimate and not junk-mail. unerwuenschte Massennachricht ist. |
Um Deine Nachricht fuer die | To release your message for delivery, Zustellung freizugeben, sende eine | please send an empty message to the leere Nachricht an die folgende | following address, or use your Adresse, oder benuetze die | mailer's "Reply" feature: Antwortfunktion Deines | Mailprogramms: |
ACHTUNG: DEINE NACHRICHT | WARNING: YOUR MESSAGE WILL
WIRD UNGELESEN GELOESCHT, | BE DELETED UNNOTICED,
WENN DU NICHT ANTWORTEST. | IF YOU DO NOT REPLY.[ This notice was generated by TMDA v0.51 (http://tmda.sf.net/),
an automated junk-mail reduction system. ]
--- Enclosed is a copy of your message.
Quoted 1 line
From [email protected] Sat Jun 21 15:57:14 2003
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: (qmail 1628 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2003 15:57:13 -0000
Received: from static213-229-22-161.adsl.inode.at (HELO homebase.endorphin.org) (213.229.22.161)
by chello080108023209.34.11.vie.surfer.at with SMTP; 21 Jun 2003 15:57:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 5281 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2003 16:53:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 5273 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2003 16:53:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO phoenix.infradead.org) (195.224.96.167)
by static213-229-22-161.adsl.inode.at with SMTP; 21 Jun 2003 16:53:09 -0000
Received: from hch by phoenix.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.10)
id 19TkjH-00073k-00; Sat, 21 Jun 2003 16:56:39 +0100
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 16:56:39 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH - RFC] loop.c
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
References: <[email protected]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from [email protected] on Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 05:07:47PM +0200
Quoted 6 lines · On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 05:07:47PM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
Concerning the second point, several patches are floating around. Below a patch that Jari Ruusu sent me.
This is a RFC.
Clemens - any comments on the crypto side?
Jens - any comments on the block I/O side?
The patch is far too big and mixes up very different issues. Let's change one thing at a time. There's was a small patch for the IV issue posted, let's get that in first and base small, reviewable patches on it. You also might want to Cc'ed Hugh as he did some work on loop.c recently..
----- End forwarded message -----