Use netdev_priv in YAM driver
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 2/9 Use netdev_priv in YAM driver
o Convert the YAM driver to use netdev_priv().
o If dev is valid there is no point in checking netdev_priv()'s return value for being NULL.
o Fix build warning.
yam.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
drivers/net/hamradio/yam.c +19 -19
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@static void yam_set_uart (struct net_device *dev) { -struct yam_port *yp = (struct yam_port *) dev->priv; +struct yam_port *yp =netdev_priv (dev);int divisor =115200 / yp->baudrate;outb (0 ,IER (dev->base_addr));
@@ -565,7 +565,7 @@static int yam_send_packet (struct sk_buff *skb,struct net_device *dev) { -struct yam_port *yp = dev->priv; +struct yam_port *yp =netdev_priv (dev);skb_queue_tail (&yp->send_queue, skb); dev->trans_start = jiffies;
@@ -592,12 +592,11 @@static void yam_arbitrate (struct net_device *dev) { -struct yam_port *yp = dev->priv; +struct yam_port *yp =netdev_priv (dev); -if (!yp || yp->magic !=YAM_MAGIC - || yp->tx_state !=TX_OFF ||skb_queue_empty (&yp->send_queue)) { +if (yp->magic !=YAM_MAGIC || yp->tx_state !=TX_OFF || +skb_queue_empty (&yp->send_queue))return ; - }/* tx_state is TX_OFF and there is data to send */ if (yp->dupmode) {
@@ -725,7 +724,7 @@for (i =0 ; i <NR_PORTS ; i++) { dev = yam_devs[i]; - yp = dev->priv; + yp =netdev_priv (dev);if (!netif_running (dev))continue ;
@@ -784,8 +783,8 @@static int yam_seq_show (struct seq_file *seq,void *v) { -const struct net_device *dev = v; -const struct yam_port *yp = dev->priv; +struct net_device *dev = v; +const struct yam_port *yp =netdev_priv (dev);seq_printf (seq,"Device %s\n" , dev->name);seq_printf (seq," Up %d\n" ,netif_running (dev));
@@ -838,10 +837,10 @@ {struct yam_port *yp; -if (!dev || !dev->priv) +if (!dev)return NULL ; - yp = (struct yam_port *) dev->priv; + yp =netdev_priv (dev);if (yp->magic !=YAM_MAGIC )return NULL ;
@@ -856,14 +855,14 @@static int yam_open (struct net_device *dev) { -struct yam_port *yp = (struct yam_port *) dev->priv; +struct yam_port *yp =netdev_priv (dev);enum uart u;int i;int ret=0 ;printk (KERN_INFO "Trying %s at iobase 0x%lx irq %u\n" , dev->name, dev->base_addr, dev->irq); -if (!dev || !yp || !yp->bitrate) +if (!dev || !yp->bitrate)return -ENXIO ;if (!dev->base_addr || dev->base_addr >0x1000 -YAM_EXTENT || dev->irq <2 || dev->irq >15 ) {
@@ -900,7 +899,7 @@/* Reset overruns for all ports - FPGA programming makes overruns */ for (i =0 ; i <NR_PORTS ; i++) {struct net_device *dev = yam_devs[i]; -struct yam_port *yp = dev->priv; +struct yam_port *yp =netdev_priv (dev);inb (LSR (dev->base_addr)); yp->stats.rx_fifo_errors =0 ; }
@@ -919,10 +918,11 @@static int yam_close (struct net_device *dev) {struct sk_buff *skb; -struct yam_port *yp = (struct yam_port *) dev->priv; +struct yam_port *yp =netdev_priv (dev); -if (!dev || !yp) +if (!dev)return -EINVAL ; +/* * disable interrupts */
@@ -944,7 +944,7 @@static int yam_ioctl (struct net_device *dev,struct ifreq *ifr,int cmd) { -struct yam_port *yp = (struct yam_port *) dev->priv; +struct yam_port *yp =netdev_priv (dev);struct yamdrv_ioctl_cfg yi;struct yamdrv_ioctl_mcs *ym;int ioctl_cmd;
@@ -952,7 +952,7 @@if (copy_from_user (&ioctl_cmd, ifr->ifr_data,sizeof (int )))return -EFAULT ; -if (yp ==NULL || yp->magic !=YAM_MAGIC ) +if (yp->magic !=YAM_MAGIC )return -EINVAL ;if (!capable (CAP_NET_ADMIN ))
@@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@static void yam_setup (struct net_device *dev) { -struct yam_port *yp = dev->priv; +struct yam_port *yp =netdev_priv (dev); yp->magic =YAM_MAGIC ; yp->bitrate =DEFAULT_BITRATE ;
Jeff Garzik
Appliedapplied patches 2-9 to netdev-2.6 queue (thus -mm, etc.).
Not sure where patch #1 went, I don't see it (unless #1 is the reformat patch)
Quoted 4 lines · Jeff Garzik
applied patches 2-9 to netdev-2.6 queue (thus -mm, etc.).
Not sure where patch #1 went, I don't see it (unless #1 is the reformat patch)
#1 did touch only the encapsulation pseudo devices provided by the NETROM and ROSE network protocols in net/netrom and net/rose so I did cc only to netdev. Thought you'd not care. In case you do, it's attached below.
Ralf
netrom/nr_dev.c | 8 ++++---- rose/rose_dev.c | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
net/netrom/nr_dev.c +4 -4
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@int nr_rx_ip (struct sk_buff *skb,struct net_device *dev) { -struct net_device_stats *stats = (struct net_device_stats *)dev->priv; +struct net_device_stats *stats =netdev_priv (dev);if (!netif_running (dev)) { stats->rx_errors++;
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@static int nr_rebuild_header (struct sk_buff *skb) {struct net_device *dev = skb->dev; -struct net_device_stats *stats = (struct net_device_stats *)dev->priv; +struct net_device_stats *stats =netdev_priv (dev);struct sk_buff *skbn;unsigned char *bp = skb->data;int len;
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@static int nr_xmit (struct sk_buff *skb,struct net_device *dev) { -struct net_device_stats *stats = (struct net_device_stats *)dev->priv; +struct net_device_stats *stats =netdev_priv (dev);dev_kfree_skb (skb); stats->tx_errors++;return 0 ;
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@static struct net_device_stats *nr_get_stats (struct net_device *dev) { -return (struct net_device_stats *)dev->priv; +return netdev_priv (dev); }void nr_setup (struct net_device *dev)
net/rose/rose_dev.c +3 -3
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@static int rose_rebuild_header (struct sk_buff *skb) {struct net_device *dev = skb->dev; -struct net_device_stats *stats = (struct net_device_stats *)dev->priv; +struct net_device_stats *stats =netdev_priv (dev);unsigned char *bp = (unsigned char *)skb->data;struct sk_buff *skbn;
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@static int rose_xmit (struct sk_buff *skb,struct net_device *dev) { -struct net_device_stats *stats = (struct net_device_stats *)dev->priv; +struct net_device_stats *stats =netdev_priv (dev);if (!netif_running (dev)) {printk (KERN_ERR "ROSE: rose_xmit - called when iface is down\n" );
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@static struct net_device_stats *rose_get_stats (struct net_device *dev) { -return (struct net_device_stats *)dev->priv; +return netdev_priv (dev); }void rose_setup (struct net_device *dev)
Quoted 11 lines · Ralf Baechle DL5RB wrote:
Quoted 3 lines · Jeff Garzik
applied patches 2-9 to netdev-2.6 queue (thus -mm, etc.).
Not sure where patch #1 went, I don't see it (unless #1 is the reformat patch)
#1 did touch only the encapsulation pseudo devices provided by the NETROM and ROSE network protocols in net/netrom and net/rose so I did cc only to netdev. Thought you'd not care. In case you do, it's attached below.
Nah, that's all DaveM. Thanks for letting me know.
Jeff
Quoted 5 lines · Jeff Garzik
Quoted 3 lines
#1 did touch only the encapsulation pseudo devices provided by the NETROM and ROSE network protocols in net/netrom and net/rose so I did cc only to netdev. Thought you'd not care. In case you do, it's attached below.
Nah, that's all DaveM. Thanks for letting me know.
Thought so.
Ralf