remove cifs_kcalloc
PATCH 1/1 remove cifs_kcalloc
This patch removes cifs_kcalloc and replaces it with calls to kcalloc(1, ...) .
Signed-off-by Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
---
fs/cifs/connect.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- 1 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
fs/cifs/connect.c renamed from fs/cifs/connect.c.old +41 -51
@@ -471,16 +471,6 @@return 0 ; } -static void * -cifs_kcalloc (size_t size,unsigned int __nocast type) -{ -void *addr; - addr =kmalloc (size, type); -if (addr) -memset (addr,0 , size); -return addr; -} -static int cifs_parse_mount_options (char *options,const char *devname,struct smb_vol *vol) {
@@ -598,7 +588,7 @@/* go from value to value + temp_len condensing double commas to singles. Note that this ends up allocating a few bytes too many, which is ok */ - vol->password =cifs_kcalloc (temp_len,GFP_KERNEL ); + vol->password =kcalloc (1 , temp_len,GFP_KERNEL );for (i=0 ,j=0 ;i<temp_len;i++,j++) { vol->password[j] = value[i];if (value[i] == separator[0 ] && value[i+1 ] == separator[0 ]) {
@@ -608,7 +598,7 @@ } vol->password[j] =0 ; }else { - vol->password =cifs_kcalloc (temp_len +1 ,GFP_KERNEL ); + vol->password =kcalloc (1 , temp_len +1 ,GFP_KERNEL );strcpy (vol->password, value); } }else if (strnicmp (data,"ip" ,2 ) ==0 ) {
@@ -1070,7 +1060,7 @@sessinit is sent but no second negprot */ struct rfc1002_session_packet * ses_init_buf;struct smb_hdr * smb_buf; - ses_init_buf =cifs_kcalloc (sizeof (struct rfc1002_session_packet ),GFP_KERNEL ); + ses_init_buf =kcalloc (1 ,sizeof (struct rfc1002_session_packet ),GFP_KERNEL );if (ses_init_buf) { ses_init_buf->trailer.session_req.called_len =32 ; rfc1002mangle(ses_init_buf->trailer.session_req.called_name,
@@ -1717,7 +1707,7 @@/* We look for obvious messed up bcc or strings in response so we do not go off the end since (at least) WIN2K and Windows XP have a major bug in not null terminating last Unicode string in response */ - ses->serverOS =cifs_kcalloc (2 * (len +1 ),GFP_KERNEL ); + ses->serverOS =kcalloc (1 ,2 * (len +1 ),GFP_KERNEL );cifs_strfromUCS_le (ses->serverOS, (wchar_t *)bcc_ptr, len,nls_codepage); bcc_ptr +=2 * (len +1 );
@@ -1727,7 +1717,7 @@if (remaining_words >0 ) { len =UniStrnlen ((wchar_t *)bcc_ptr, remaining_words-1 ); - ses->serverNOS =cifs_kcalloc (2 * (len +1 ),GFP_KERNEL ); + ses->serverNOS =kcalloc (1 ,2 * (len +1 ),GFP_KERNEL );cifs_strfromUCS_le (ses->serverNOS, (wchar_t *)bcc_ptr,len,nls_codepage); bcc_ptr +=2 * (len +1 );
@@ -1743,7 +1733,7 @@ len =UniStrnlen ((wchar_t *) bcc_ptr, remaining_words);/* last string is not always null terminated (for e.g. for Windows XP & 2000) */ ses->serverDomain = -cifs_kcalloc (2 *(len+1 ),GFP_KERNEL ); +kcalloc (1 ,2 *(len+1 ),GFP_KERNEL );cifs_strfromUCS_le (ses->serverDomain, (wchar_t *)bcc_ptr,len,nls_codepage); bcc_ptr +=2 * (len +1 );
@@ -1752,20 +1742,20 @@ }/* else no more room so create dummy domain string */ else ses->serverDomain = -cifs_kcalloc (2 , +kcalloc (1 ,2 ,GFP_KERNEL ); }else {/* no room so create dummy domain and NOS string */ ses->serverDomain = -cifs_kcalloc (2 ,GFP_KERNEL ); +kcalloc (1 ,2 ,GFP_KERNEL ); ses->serverNOS = -cifs_kcalloc (2 ,GFP_KERNEL ); +kcalloc (1 ,2 ,GFP_KERNEL ); } }else {/* ASCII */ len =strnlen (bcc_ptr,1024 );if (((long ) bcc_ptr + len) - (long )pByteArea (smb_buffer_response) <=BCC (smb_buffer_response)) { - ses->serverOS =cifs_kcalloc (len +1 ,GFP_KERNEL ); + ses->serverOS =kcalloc (1 , len +1 ,GFP_KERNEL );strncpy (ses->serverOS,bcc_ptr, len); bcc_ptr += len;
@@ -1773,14 +1763,14 @@ bcc_ptr++; len =strnlen (bcc_ptr,1024 ); - ses->serverNOS =cifs_kcalloc (len +1 ,GFP_KERNEL ); + ses->serverNOS =kcalloc (1 , len +1 ,GFP_KERNEL );strncpy (ses->serverNOS, bcc_ptr, len); bcc_ptr += len; bcc_ptr[0 ] =0 ; bcc_ptr++; len =strnlen (bcc_ptr,1024 ); - ses->serverDomain =cifs_kcalloc (len +1 ,GFP_KERNEL ); + ses->serverDomain =kcalloc (1 , len +1 ,GFP_KERNEL );strncpy (ses->serverDomain, bcc_ptr, len); bcc_ptr += len; bcc_ptr[0 ] =0 ;
@@ -1977,7 +1967,7 @@the end since (at least) WIN2K and Windows XP have a major bug in not null terminating last Unicode string in response */ ses->serverOS = -cifs_kcalloc (2 * (len +1 ),GFP_KERNEL ); +kcalloc (1 ,2 * (len +1 ),GFP_KERNEL ); cifs_strfromUCS_le(ses->serverOS, (wchar_t *) bcc_ptr, len,
@@ -1991,7 +1981,7 @@ remaining_words - 1); ses->serverNOS = -cifs_kcalloc (2 * (len +1 ), +kcalloc (1 ,2 * (len +1 ),GFP_KERNEL ); cifs_strfromUCS_le(ses->serverNOS, (wchar_t *)bcc_ptr,
@@ -2004,7 +1994,7 @@if (remaining_words >0 ) { len =UniStrnlen ((wchar_t *) bcc_ptr, remaining_words);/* last string is not always null terminated (for e.g. for Windows XP & 2000) */ - ses->serverDomain =cifs_kcalloc (2 *(len+1 ),GFP_KERNEL ); + ses->serverDomain =kcalloc (1 ,2 *(len+1 ),GFP_KERNEL ); cifs_strfromUCS_le(ses->serverDomain, (wchar_t *)bcc_ptr, len,
@@ -2015,10 +2005,10 @@ }/* else no more room so create dummy domain string */ else ses->serverDomain = -cifs_kcalloc (2 ,GFP_KERNEL ); +kcalloc (1 ,2 ,GFP_KERNEL ); }else {/* no room so create dummy domain and NOS string */ - ses->serverDomain =cifs_kcalloc (2 ,GFP_KERNEL ); - ses->serverNOS =cifs_kcalloc (2 ,GFP_KERNEL ); + ses->serverDomain =kcalloc (1 ,2 ,GFP_KERNEL ); + ses->serverNOS =kcalloc (1 ,2 ,GFP_KERNEL ); } }else {/* ASCII */
@@ -2026,7 +2016,7 @@if (((long ) bcc_ptr + len) - (long )pByteArea (smb_buffer_response) <=BCC (smb_buffer_response)) { - ses->serverOS =cifs_kcalloc (len +1 ,GFP_KERNEL ); + ses->serverOS =kcalloc (1 , len +1 ,GFP_KERNEL );strncpy (ses->serverOS, bcc_ptr, len); bcc_ptr += len;
@@ -2034,14 +2024,14 @@ bcc_ptr++; len =strnlen (bcc_ptr,1024 ); - ses->serverNOS =cifs_kcalloc (len +1 ,GFP_KERNEL ); + ses->serverNOS =kcalloc (1 , len +1 ,GFP_KERNEL );strncpy (ses->serverNOS, bcc_ptr, len); bcc_ptr += len; bcc_ptr[0 ] =0 ; bcc_ptr++; len =strnlen (bcc_ptr,1024 ); - ses->serverDomain =cifs_kcalloc (len +1 ,GFP_KERNEL ); + ses->serverDomain =kcalloc (1 , len +1 ,GFP_KERNEL );strncpy (ses->serverDomain, bcc_ptr, len); bcc_ptr += len; bcc_ptr[0 ] =0 ;
@@ -2291,7 +2281,7 @@the end since (at least) WIN2K and Windows XP have a major bug in not null terminating last Unicode string in response */ ses->serverOS = -cifs_kcalloc (2 * (len +1 ),GFP_KERNEL ); +kcalloc (1 ,2 * (len +1 ),GFP_KERNEL ); cifs_strfromUCS_le(ses->serverOS, (wchar_t *) bcc_ptr, len,
@@ -2306,7 +2296,7 @@ remaining_words - 1); ses->serverNOS = -cifs_kcalloc (2 * (len +1 ), +kcalloc (1 ,2 * (len +1 ),GFP_KERNEL ); cifs_strfromUCS_le(ses-> serverNOS,
@@ -2323,7 +2313,7 @@ len =UniStrnlen ((wchar_t *) bcc_ptr, remaining_words);/* last string is not always null terminated (for e.g. for Windows XP & 2000) */ ses->serverDomain = -cifs_kcalloc (2 * +kcalloc (1 ,2 * (len +1 ),GFP_KERNEL );
@@ -2349,13 +2339,13 @@ }/* else no more room so create dummy domain string */ else ses->serverDomain = -cifs_kcalloc (2 , +kcalloc (1 ,2 ,GFP_KERNEL ); }else {/* no room so create dummy domain and NOS string */ ses->serverDomain = -cifs_kcalloc (2 ,GFP_KERNEL ); +kcalloc (1 ,2 ,GFP_KERNEL ); ses->serverNOS = -cifs_kcalloc (2 ,GFP_KERNEL ); +kcalloc (1 ,2 ,GFP_KERNEL ); } }else {/* ASCII */ len =strnlen (bcc_ptr,1024 );
@@ -2363,7 +2353,7 @@ pByteArea(smb_buffer_response) <= BCC(smb_buffer_response)) { ses->serverOS = -cifs_kcalloc (len +1 , +kcalloc (1 , len +1 ,GFP_KERNEL );strncpy (ses->serverOS, bcc_ptr, len);
@@ -2374,7 +2364,7 @@ len =strnlen (bcc_ptr,1024 ); ses->serverNOS = -cifs_kcalloc (len +1 , +kcalloc (1 , len +1 ,GFP_KERNEL );strncpy (ses->serverNOS, bcc_ptr, len); bcc_ptr += len;
@@ -2383,7 +2373,7 @@ len =strnlen (bcc_ptr,1024 ); ses->serverDomain = -cifs_kcalloc (len +1 , +kcalloc (1 , len +1 ,GFP_KERNEL );strncpy (ses->serverDomain, bcc_ptr, len); bcc_ptr += len;
@@ -2685,7 +2675,7 @@the end since (at least) WIN2K and Windows XP have a major bug in not null terminating last Unicode string in response */ ses->serverOS = -cifs_kcalloc (2 * (len +1 ),GFP_KERNEL ); +kcalloc (1 ,2 * (len +1 ),GFP_KERNEL ); cifs_strfromUCS_le(ses->serverOS, (wchar_t *) bcc_ptr, len,
@@ -2700,7 +2690,7 @@ remaining_words - 1); ses->serverNOS = -cifs_kcalloc (2 * (len +1 ), +kcalloc (1 ,2 * (len +1 ),GFP_KERNEL ); cifs_strfromUCS_le(ses-> serverNOS,
@@ -2716,7 +2706,7 @@ len =UniStrnlen ((wchar_t *) bcc_ptr, remaining_words);/* last string not always null terminated (e.g. for Windows XP & 2000) */ ses->serverDomain = -cifs_kcalloc (2 * +kcalloc (1 ,2 * (len +1 ),GFP_KERNEL );
@@ -2741,17 +2731,17 @@ = 0; }/* else no more room so create dummy domain string */ else - ses->serverDomain =cifs_kcalloc (2 ,GFP_KERNEL ); + ses->serverDomain =kcalloc (1 ,2 ,GFP_KERNEL ); }else {/* no room so create dummy domain and NOS string */ - ses->serverDomain =cifs_kcalloc (2 ,GFP_KERNEL ); - ses->serverNOS =cifs_kcalloc (2 ,GFP_KERNEL ); + ses->serverDomain =kcalloc (1 ,2 ,GFP_KERNEL ); + ses->serverNOS =kcalloc (1 ,2 ,GFP_KERNEL ); } }else {/* ASCII */ len =strnlen (bcc_ptr,1024 );if (((long ) bcc_ptr + len) - (long )pByteArea (smb_buffer_response) <=BCC (smb_buffer_response)) { - ses->serverOS =cifs_kcalloc (len +1 ,GFP_KERNEL ); + ses->serverOS =kcalloc (1 , len +1 ,GFP_KERNEL );strncpy (ses->serverOS,bcc_ptr, len); bcc_ptr += len;
@@ -2759,14 +2749,14 @@ bcc_ptr++; len =strnlen (bcc_ptr,1024 ); - ses->serverNOS =cifs_kcalloc (len+1 ,GFP_KERNEL ); + ses->serverNOS =kcalloc (1 , len+1 ,GFP_KERNEL );strncpy (ses->serverNOS, bcc_ptr, len); bcc_ptr += len; bcc_ptr[0 ] =0 ; bcc_ptr++; len =strnlen (bcc_ptr,1024 ); - ses->serverDomain =cifs_kcalloc (len+1 ,GFP_KERNEL ); + ses->serverDomain =kcalloc (1 , len+1 ,GFP_KERNEL );strncpy (ses->serverDomain, bcc_ptr, len); bcc_ptr += len; bcc_ptr[0 ] =0 ;
@@ -2878,7 +2868,7 @@if (tcon->nativeFileSystem)kfree (tcon->nativeFileSystem); tcon->nativeFileSystem = -cifs_kcalloc (length +2 ,GFP_KERNEL ); +kcalloc (1 , length +2 ,GFP_KERNEL );cifs_strfromUCS_le (tcon->nativeFileSystem, (wchar_t *) bcc_ptr, length, nls_codepage);
@@ -2896,7 +2886,7 @@if (tcon->nativeFileSystem)kfree (tcon->nativeFileSystem); tcon->nativeFileSystem = -cifs_kcalloc (length +1 ,GFP_KERNEL ); +kcalloc (1 , length +1 ,GFP_KERNEL );strncpy (tcon->nativeFileSystem, bcc_ptr, length); }
Quoted 4 lines · Adrian Bunk
This patch removes
cifs_kcallocand replaces it with calls tokcalloc(1, ...).Signed-off-by Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
As a followup patch you might want to check the return value of all those calls before blindly deferencing them.
Dave