Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Review: fix test 004 to account for reserved space

DISCUSSION David Chinner 3 participants 6 messages Jun 4, 2007 – Jun 18, 2007 XFS filesystem

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

With the changes to use some space by default in only in memory as a reserved pool, df and statfs will now output a fre block count that is slightly different to what is held in the superblock.

Update the qa test to account for this change.

Cheers,

Dave.

Signature · 59 lines
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group

---
 xfstests/004 |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Index: xfs-cmds/xfstests/004
===================================================================
--- xfs-cmds.orig/xfstests/004	2006-11-14 19:57:39.000000000 +1100
+++ xfs-cmds/xfstests/004	2007-05-04 16:38:03.957537306 +1000
@@ -67,21 +67,36 @@ xfs_db -r -c "freesp -s" $SCRATCH_DEV >$
 echo "xfs_db for $SCRATCH_DEV" >>$seq.full
 cat $tmp.xfs_db >>$seq.full
 
+eval `$XFS_IO_PROG -x -c resblks $SCRATCH_MNT 2>&1 \
+	| $AWK_PROG '/available/ { printf "resblks=%u\n", $5 }'`
+echo "resblks gave: resblks=$resblks" >>$seq.full
+
 # check the 'blocks' field from freesp command is OK
 # since 2.6.18, df does not report the 4 blocks per AG that cannot
 # be allocated, hence we check for that exact mismatch.
+# since ~2.6.22, reserved blocks are used by default and df does
+# not report them, hence check for an exact mismatch.
 perl -ne '
-	    BEGIN	{ $avail ='$avail' * 512;
-			  $answer="(no xfs_db free blocks line?)" }
-	    /free blocks (\d+)$/	|| next;
-	    $freesp = $1 * '$dbsize';
-	    if ($freesp == $avail)	{ $answer = "yes"; }
-	    else {
+	BEGIN	{ $avail ='$avail' * 512;
+		  $answer="(no xfs_db free blocks line?)" }
+	/free blocks (\d+)$/	|| next;
+	$freesp = $1 * '$dbsize';
+	if ($freesp == $avail) {
+		$answer = "yes";
+	} else {
 		$avail = $avail + (('$agcount' + 1) * '$dbsize' * 4);
-		if ($freesp == $avail)	{ $answer = "yes"; }
-		else			{ $answer = "no ($freesp != $avail)"; }
-	    }
-	    END	{ print "$answer\n" }
+		if ($freesp == $avail) {
+			$answer = "yes";
+		} else {
+			$avail = $avail + ('$resblks' * '$dbsize');
+			if ($freesp == $avail) {
+				$answer = "yes";
+			} else {
+				$answer = "no ($freesp != $avail)";
+			}
+		}
+	}
+	END	{ print "$answer\n" }
 	' <$tmp.xfs_db >$tmp.ans
 ans="`cat $tmp.ans`"
 echo "Checking blocks column same as df: $ans"
#1 lore raw

Ping?

Quoted 69 lines · David Chinner

With the changes to use some space by default in only in memory as a reserved pool, df and statfs will now output a fre block count that is slightly different to what is held in the superblock.

Update the qa test to account for this change.

Cheers,

Dave.

Signature · 10 lines
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group

---
 xfstests/004 |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Index: xfs-cmds/xfstests/004
===================================================================
xfstests/004 +25 -10
@@ -67,21 +67,36 @@ xfs_db -r -c "freesp -s" $SCRATCH_DEV >$
 echo "xfs_db for $SCRATCH_DEV" >>$seq.full
 cat $tmp.xfs_db >>$seq.full
 
+eval `$XFS_IO_PROG -x -c resblks $SCRATCH_MNT 2>&1 \
+	| $AWK_PROG '/available/ { printf "resblks=%u\n", $5 }'`
+echo "resblks gave: resblks=$resblks" >>$seq.full
+
 # check the 'blocks' field from freesp command is OK
 # since 2.6.18, df does not report the 4 blocks per AG that cannot
 # be allocated, hence we check for that exact mismatch.
+# since ~2.6.22, reserved blocks are used by default and df does
+# not report them, hence check for an exact mismatch.
 perl -ne '
-	    BEGIN	{ $avail ='$avail' * 512;
-			  $answer="(no xfs_db free blocks line?)" }
-	    /free blocks (\d+)$/	|| next;
-	    $freesp = $1 * '$dbsize';
-	    if ($freesp == $avail)	{ $answer = "yes"; }
-	    else {
+	BEGIN	{ $avail ='$avail' * 512;
+		  $answer="(no xfs_db free blocks line?)" }
+	/free blocks (\d+)$/	|| next;
+	$freesp = $1 * '$dbsize';
+	if ($freesp == $avail) {
+		$answer = "yes";
+	} else {
 		$avail = $avail + (('$agcount' + 1) * '$dbsize' * 4);
-		if ($freesp == $avail)	{ $answer = "yes"; }
-		else			{ $answer = "no ($freesp != $avail)"; }
-	    }
-	    END	{ print "$answer\n" }
+		if ($freesp == $avail) {
+			$answer = "yes";
+		} else {
+			$avail = $avail + ('$resblks' * '$dbsize');
+			if ($freesp == $avail) {
+				$answer = "yes";
+			} else {
+				$answer = "no ($freesp != $avail)";
+			}
+		}
+	}
+	END	{ print "$answer\n" }
 	' <$tmp.xfs_db >$tmp.ans
 ans="`cat $tmp.ans`"
 echo "Checking blocks column same as df: $ans"
Signature · 3 lines
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
#2 lore raw

I have to go home now, but I'll look at this one soon.

--Tim

Quoted 73 lines · David Chinner

Ping?

Quoted 69 lines · David Chinner

With the changes to use some space by default in only in memory as a reserved pool, df and statfs will now output a fre block count that is slightly different to what is held in the superblock.

Update the qa test to account for this change.

Cheers,

Dave.

Signature · 10 lines
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group

---
 xfstests/004 |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Index: xfs-cmds/xfstests/004
===================================================================
xfstests/004 +25 -10
@@ -67,21 +67,36 @@ xfs_db -r -c "freesp -s" $SCRATCH_DEV >$
 echo "xfs_db for $SCRATCH_DEV" >>$seq.full
 cat $tmp.xfs_db >>$seq.full
 
+eval `$XFS_IO_PROG -x -c resblks $SCRATCH_MNT 2>&1 \
+	| $AWK_PROG '/available/ { printf "resblks=%u\n", $5 }'`
+echo "resblks gave: resblks=$resblks" >>$seq.full
+
 # check the 'blocks' field from freesp command is OK
 # since 2.6.18, df does not report the 4 blocks per AG that cannot
 # be allocated, hence we check for that exact mismatch.
+# since ~2.6.22, reserved blocks are used by default and df does
+# not report them, hence check for an exact mismatch.
 perl -ne '
-	    BEGIN	{ $avail ='$avail' * 512;
-			  $answer="(no xfs_db free blocks line?)" }
-	    /free blocks (\d+)$/	|| next;
-	    $freesp = $1 * '$dbsize';
-	    if ($freesp == $avail)	{ $answer = "yes"; }
-	    else {
+	BEGIN	{ $avail ='$avail' * 512;
+		  $answer="(no xfs_db free blocks line?)" }
+	/free blocks (\d+)$/	|| next;
+	$freesp = $1 * '$dbsize';
+	if ($freesp == $avail) {
+		$answer = "yes";
+	} else {
 		$avail = $avail + (('$agcount' + 1) * '$dbsize' * 4);
-		if ($freesp == $avail)	{ $answer = "yes"; }
-		else			{ $answer = "no ($freesp != $avail)"; }
-	    }
-	    END	{ print "$answer\n" }
+		if ($freesp == $avail) {
+			$answer = "yes";
+		} else {
+			$avail = $avail + ('$resblks' * '$dbsize');
+			if ($freesp == $avail) {
+				$answer = "yes";
+			} else {
+				$answer = "no ($freesp != $avail)";
+			}
+		}
+	}
+	END	{ print "$answer\n" }
 	' <$tmp.xfs_db >$tmp.ans
 ans="`cat $tmp.ans`"
 echo "Checking blocks column same as df: $ans"
#3 lore raw
In reply to David Chinner

Hi Dave,

Yes that looks not bad.

However, your last proposal, prompted from Nathan, was to adjust f_bavail differently than bfree to account for how much was available in the reserved block space.

struct statfs {

 long    f_type;     /* type of filesystem (see below) */
 long    f_bsize;    /* optimal transfer block size */
 long    f_blocks;   /* total data blocks in file system */
 long    f_bfree;    /* free blocks in fs */                    <------ 
includes reserved
 long    f_bavail;   /* free blocks avail to non-superuser */   <------ 
doesn't include reserved
 long    f_files;    /* total file nodes in file system */
 long    f_ffree;    /* free file nodes in fs */
 fsid_t  f_fsid;     /* file system id */
 long    f_namelen;  /* maximum length of filenames */
 long    f_spare[6]; /* spare for later */

};

And looking at df code it uses bfree in calculation of space used... the 3rd field of df output.

df code:
---------------------------------------------------------------

    total = fsu.fsu_blocks;
    available = fsu.fsu_bavail;
    negate_available = (fsu.fsu_bavail_top_bit_set
             & (available != UINTMAX_MAX));
    available_to_root = fsu.fsu_bfree;

}

used = UINTMAX_MAX;
negate_used = false;
if (total != UINTMAX_MAX && available_to_root != UINTMAX_MAX)

  {
    used = total - available_to_root;
    negate_used = (total < available_to_root);

}

printf (" %*s %*s %*s ",
width + col1_adjustment,
df_readable (false, total,
buf[0], input_units, output_units),
width, df_readable (negate_used, used,
buf[1], input_units, output_units),
width, df_readable (negate_available, available,
buf[2], input_units, output_units));
-----------------------------------------------------------------
example df output:
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda3 18864128 7476720 11387408 40% /
-------------------------------------------------------------------

And indeed we set "used" as a shell variable in test 004 from df but don't seem to do anything with it.
I think we should check it to verify that we have set bfree correctly.

Cheers,
Tim.

Quoted 76 lines · David Chinner

Ping?

Quoted 70 lines · David Chinner

With the changes to use some space by default in only in memory as a reserved pool, df and statfs will now output a fre block count that is slightly different to what is held in the superblock.

Update the qa test to account for this change.

Cheers,

Dave.

Signature · 10 lines
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group

---
 xfstests/004 |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Index: xfs-cmds/xfstests/004
===================================================================
xfstests/004 +25 -10
@@ -67,21 +67,36 @@ xfs_db -r -c "freesp -s" $SCRATCH_DEV >$
 echo "xfs_db for $SCRATCH_DEV" >>$seq.full
 cat $tmp.xfs_db >>$seq.full
 
+eval `$XFS_IO_PROG -x -c resblks $SCRATCH_MNT 2>&1 \
+	| $AWK_PROG '/available/ { printf "resblks=%u\n", $5 }'`
+echo "resblks gave: resblks=$resblks" >>$seq.full
+
 # check the 'blocks' field from freesp command is OK
 # since 2.6.18, df does not report the 4 blocks per AG that cannot
 # be allocated, hence we check for that exact mismatch.
+# since ~2.6.22, reserved blocks are used by default and df does
+# not report them, hence check for an exact mismatch.
 perl -ne '
-	    BEGIN	{ $avail ='$avail' * 512;
-			  $answer="(no xfs_db free blocks line?)" }
-	    /free blocks (\d+)$/	|| next;
-	    $freesp = $1 * '$dbsize';
-	    if ($freesp == $avail)	{ $answer = "yes"; }
-	    else {
+	BEGIN	{ $avail ='$avail' * 512;
+		  $answer="(no xfs_db free blocks line?)" }
+	/free blocks (\d+)$/	|| next;
+	$freesp = $1 * '$dbsize';
+	if ($freesp == $avail) {
+		$answer = "yes";
+	} else {
 		$avail = $avail + (('$agcount' + 1) * '$dbsize' * 4);
-		if ($freesp == $avail)	{ $answer = "yes"; }
-		else			{ $answer = "no ($freesp != $avail)"; }
-	    }
-	    END	{ print "$answer\n" }
+		if ($freesp == $avail) {
+			$answer = "yes";
+		} else {
+			$avail = $avail + ('$resblks' * '$dbsize');
+			if ($freesp == $avail) {
+				$answer = "yes";
+			} else {
+				$answer = "no ($freesp != $avail)";
+			}
+		}
+	}
+	END	{ print "$answer\n" }
 	' <$tmp.xfs_db >$tmp.ans
 ans="`cat $tmp.ans`"
 echo "Checking blocks column same as df: $ans"
#4 lore raw
In reply to David Chinner
Quoted 5 lines · David Chinner

With the changes to use some space by default in only in memory as a reserved pool, df and statfs will now output a fre block count that is slightly different to what is held in the superblock.

Update the qa test to account for this change.

I think we should rather subtract the amount of internally reserved blocks from the return value in xfs_statvfs.

#5 lore raw
Quoted 9 lines · Christoph Hellwig
Quoted 5 lines · David Chinner

With the changes to use some space by default in only in memory as a reserved pool, df and statfs will now output a fre block count that is slightly different to what is held in the superblock.

Update the qa test to account for this change.

I think we should rather subtract the amount of internally reserved blocks from the return value in xfs_statvfs.

Which return value?

With this patch:

---
 fs/xfs/xfs_vfsops.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
fs/xfs/xfs_vfsops.c +1 -0
Index: 2.6.x-xfs-new/fs/xfs/xfs_vfsops.c
===================================================================
@@ -876,6 +876,7 @@ xfs_statvfs(
 	statp->f_blocks = sbp->sb_dblocks - lsize;
 	statp->f_bfree = statp->f_bavail =
 				sbp->sb_fdblocks - XFS_ALLOC_SET_ASIDE(mp);
+	statp->f_bfree += mp->m_resblks_avail;
 	fakeinos = statp->f_bfree << sbp->sb_inopblog;
 #if XFS_BIG_INUMS
 	fakeinos += mp->m_inoadd;

An strace of df --block-size=4k gives:

statfs("/mnt/test", {f_type=0x58465342, f_bsize=4096, f_blocks=1048616, f_bfree=874158, f_bavail=873134, f_files=4204672, f_ffree=4191008, f_fsid={2072, 0}, f_namelen=255, f_frsize=4096}) = 0
write(1, "/dev/sdb8 1048616 "..., 66/dev/sdb8 1048616 174458 873134 17% /mnt/test
) = 66
statfs("/mnt/scratch", {f_type=0x58465342, f_bsize=4096, f_blocks=1248496, f_bfree=1248392, f_bavail=1247368, f_files=5004224, f_ffree=5004220, f_fsid={2073, 0}, f_namelen=255, f_frsize=4096}) = 0
write(1, "/dev/sdb9 1248496 "..., 69/dev/sdb9 1248496 104 1247368 1% /mnt/scratch

Is this what you were thinking of?

Note that this still requires the fix to the qa test because the value in the on disk superblock matches f_bfree, not f_bavail and df appears to output f_bavail....

Cheers,

Dave.

Signature · 3 lines
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group