parametrization for bmxd on ethernet?
Hi
I did'nt find doku on that.
As i'm getting a 2nd GW :-)...
setup:
---"DMZ"
/
vsat --- gateway ------ wifi-gw --- "wifi-world" --- 2nd-wifi-gw
\
---"wifi-world-2"I'm running bmxd-rv785 on all the wireless stuff, where wifi-gw runs bmxd -g -blabla, but i liked to move the bmxd-gw to the cabled gw, so if the sat-link fails, "wifi-world-2" and "DMZ" can still reach the internet through the 2nd-wifi-gw.
So howto parametrize bmxd for devices without wireless-intrerface? Can i use --gateway-change-hysteresis together with -p ?
Suggestion: in bmxd -cbd1 i saw nodes with lvld >400 before they get deleted, i think 180 should be more than enough, 3 minutes is plenty of time for normal reboot, and if a node dosn't send OGMs for more than that... it has a serious problem ;)
cheers
--Jan
Hi,
Quoted 12 lines · Jan Hetges
Hi
I did'nt find doku on that.
As i'm getting a 2nd GW :-)...setup:
---"DMZ" / vsat --- gateway ------ wifi-gw --- "wifi-world" --- 2nd-wifi-gw \ ---"wifi-world-2"
Quoted 5 lines
I'm running bmxd-rv785 on all the wireless stuff, where wifi-gw runs bmxd -g -blabla, but i liked to move the bmxd-gw to the cabled gw, so if the sat-link fails, "wifi-world-2" and "DMZ" can still reach the internet through the 2nd-wifi-gw.
So howto parametrize bmxd for devices without wireless-intrerface
usually the same parameters as for a node with a wireless interface should be fine, like:
bmxd -g 1000 eth0:bmx eth1:bmx
You can slightly optimize the cpu consumtion and protocol-traffic-overhead by appending the /c 100 option to the first interface parameter like:
batmand -g 1000 eth0:bat /c 100 eth1:bat
This overwrites the default configuration (/c 200) of the first interface parameter which is assumed to be the only wlan interface. /c 200 achieves some optimization for the path detection via wireless links.
However, on a cabled lan the protocol-traffic-overhead does not really hurt and on a i386 architecture you will barely recognize any increased cpu consumption.
Quoted 1 line
Can i use --gateway-change-hysteresis together with -p ?
No, --gateway-change-hysteresis can only be used with -r 3 (fast-switch internet connection).
with -p 10.1.2.3 the gw-client will stick to its selected gw as long as its somehow available (until it times out, as you described below).
Quoted 4 lines
Suggestion: in bmxd -cbd1 i saw nodes with lvld >400 before they get deleted, i think 180 should be more than enough, 3 minutes is plenty of time for normal reboot, and if a node dosn't send OGMs for more than that... it has a serious problem ;)
Well, these long timeout defaults are kind of traditional remains from batmand-0.2. But, not constantly receiving OGMs from a distant node does not mean that the distant node has not send some or is down. And it also does not necessarily mean that the old route to this distant node does not work anymore. With 0.2 we sometimes observed paths to distant nodes via which only one OGMs was received within the current window-size (which was 128 seconds) and still the path was somehow usable.
On the other hand we thought that it has no much benifits to delete a stale route (even when its definitely death). Not unless a better path is known.
Ok. 0.2 had some problems with path detection and -p is another argument to reconsider this purge timeout.
ciao,
/axel
Quoted 4 lines
cheers
--Jan
Quoted 38 lines · Axel Neumann
Hi,
Quoted 12 lines · Jan Hetges
Hi
I did'nt find doku on that.
As i'm getting a 2nd GW :-)...setup:
---"DMZ" / vsat --- gateway ------ wifi-gw --- "wifi-world" --- 2nd-wifi-gw \ ---"wifi-world-2"Quoted 5 lines
I'm running bmxd-rv785 on all the wireless stuff, where wifi-gw runs bmxd -g -blabla, but i liked to move the bmxd-gw to the cabled gw, so if the sat-link fails, "wifi-world-2" and "DMZ" can still reach the internet through the 2nd-wifi-gw.
So howto parametrize bmxd for devices without wireless-intrerfaceusually the same parameters as for a node with a wireless interface should be fine, like:
bmxd -g 1000 eth0:bmx eth1:bmxYou can slightly optimize the cpu consumtion and protocol-traffic-overhead by appending the /c 100 option to the first interface parameter like:
batmand -g 1000 eth0:bat /c 100 eth1:bat
This overwrites the default configuration (/c 200) of the first interface parameter which is assumed to be the only wlan interface. /c 200 achieves some optimization for the path detection via wireless links.
However, on a cabled lan the protocol-traffic-overhead does not really hurt and on a i386 architecture you will barely recognize any increased cpu consumption.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
Can i use --gateway-change-hysteresis together with -p ?
No, --gateway-change-hysteresis can only be used with -r 3 (fast-switch internet connection).
with -p 10.1.2.3 the gw-client will stick to its selected gw as long as its somehow available (until it times out, as you described below).
sorry, actually my question has to be:
can i use -p together with -r3 ?
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Suggestion: in bmxd -cbd1 i saw nodes with lvld >400 before they get deleted, i think 180 should be more than enough, 3 minutes is plenty of time for normal reboot, and if a node dosn't send OGMs for more than that... it has a serious problem ;)
Quoted 7 lines
Well, these long timeout defaults are kind of traditional remains from batmand-0.2. But, not constantly receiving OGMs from a distant node does not mean that the distant node has not send some or is down. And it also does not necessarily mean that the old route to this distant node does not work anymore. With 0.2 we sometimes observed paths to distant nodes via which only one OGMs was received within the current window-size (which was 128 seconds) and still the path was somehow usable.
yes, and sometimes (actually pretty often in some cases) there was not even one OGM received and the path would hav been pretty usable ;-)
Quoted 2 lines
On the other hand we thought that it has no much benifits to delete a stale route (even when its definitely death). Not unless a better path is known.
primarily i'm thinking about path(s) to gw-nodes, in my case here, i loose the vsat regularly due to power-outages and missing backup batteries because of the energy hunger of that beast.
But i have to do "some kind of load balancing", and thought for now, it would be the easiest to do that with -p.
Quoted 2 lines
Ok. 0.2 had some problems with path detection
which bmxd doesn't have :-)
cheers
--Jan
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 2 lines
So howto parametrize bmxd for devices without wireless-intrerface
usually the same parameters as for a node with a wireless interface should be fine, like:
bmxd -g 1000 eth0:bmx eth1:bmxYou can slightly optimize the cpu consumtion and protocol-traffic-overhead by appending the /c 100 option to the first interface parameter like:
batmand -g 1000 eth0:bat /c 100 eth1:bat
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
This overwrites the default configuration (/c 200) of the first interface parameter which is assumed to be the only wlan interface. /c 200 achieves some optimization for the path detection via wireless links.
However, on a cabled lan the protocol-traffic-overhead does not really hurt and on a i386 architecture you will barely recognize any increased cpu consumption.
update: I added two more simple interface specific option with rv801 . The daemon now tells you about this during startup:
The batman-exp default parametrization assumes the first given interface argument to be the one and only wireless interface, followed by zero or more lan interfaces! To change this assumption mark the interfaces explicitly using /w to specify the wlan interface(s) and /l to specify the lan interface(s). Example: batmand eth0 /l wlan0 /w ath1 /w
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Can i use --gateway-change-hysteresis together with -p ?
No, --gateway-change-hysteresis can only be used with -r 3 (fast-switch internet connection).
with -p 10.1.2.3 the gw-client will stick to its selected gw as long as its somehow available (until it times out, as you described below).
sorry, actually my question has to be:
can i use -p together with -r3 ?
You can. Then -r3 is the fallback strategy for the GW selection in case the preferred one is not available. But still the client-node will not think about choosing a faster GW until the preferred GW has been purged. Once the preferred GW is not available anymore it uses the -r3 policy to switch between the remaining available GWs :-(
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Suggestion: in bmxd -cbd1 i saw nodes with lvld >400 before they get deleted, i think 180 should be more than enough, 3 minutes is plenty of time for normal reboot, and if a node dosn't send OGMs for more than that... it has a serious problem ;)
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Well, these long timeout defaults are kind of traditional remains from batmand-0.2. But, not constantly receiving OGMs from a distant node does not mean that the distant node has not send some or is down. And it also does not necessarily mean that the old route to this distant node does not work anymore. With 0.2 we sometimes observed paths to distant nodes via which only one OGMs was received within the current window-size (which was 128 seconds) and still the path was somehow usable.
another update:
You can slightly modify the purge interval by configuring the value used for the rudimentary DuplicateAddressDetection (--dad-timeout). Default is 100 which means that the DAD timeout is 100% of the (originator-interval * window-size). So 150 seconds by default. The daeomon also tells you about these values during startup: --dad-timeout 50 (which is the minimum allowed) will print:
Using duplicate-address-detection timeout 75s, purge timeout 160s, originator interval 1500ms, window size 100
ciao,
axel
Quoted 20 lines
yes, and sometimes (actually pretty often in some cases) there was not even one OGM received and the path would hav been pretty usable ;-)
Quoted 3 lines
On the other hand we thought that it has no much benifits to delete a stale route (even when its definitely death). Not unless a better path is known.
primarily i'm thinking about path(s) to gw-nodes, in my case here, i loose the vsat regularly due to power-outages and missing backup batteries because of the energy hunger of that beast.
But i have to do "some kind of load balancing", and thought for now, it would be the easiest to do that with -p.Quoted 1 line
Ok. 0.2 had some problems with path detection
which bmxd doesn't have :-)
cheers
--Jan
Quoted 20 lines · Axel Neumann
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 2 lines
So howto parametrize bmxd for devices without wireless-intrerface
usually the same parameters as for a node with a wireless interface should be fine, like:
bmxd -g 1000 eth0:bmx eth1:bmxYou can slightly optimize the cpu consumtion and protocol-traffic-overhead by appending the /c 100 option to the first interface parameter like:
batmand -g 1000 eth0:bat /c 100 eth1:bat
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
This overwrites the default configuration (/c 200) of the first interface parameter which is assumed to be the only wlan interface. /c 200 achieves some optimization for the path detection via wireless links.
However, on a cabled lan the protocol-traffic-overhead does not really hurt and on a i386 architecture you will barely recognize any increased cpu consumption.
Quoted 7 lines
update: I added two more simple interface specific option with rv801 . The daemon now tells you about this during startup:
The batman-exp default parametrization assumes the first given interface argument to be the one and only wireless interface, followed by zero or more lan interfaces! To change this assumption mark the interfaces explicitly using /w to specify the wlan interface(s) and /l to specify the lan interface(s). Example: batmand eth0 /l wlan0 /w ath1 /w
nice one
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Can i use --gateway-change-hysteresis together with -p ?
No, --gateway-change-hysteresis can only be used with -r 3 (fast-switch internet connection).
with -p 10.1.2.3 the gw-client will stick to its selected gw as long as its somehow available (until it times out, as you described below).
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
sorry, actually my question has to be:
can i use -p together with -r3 ?You can. Then -r3 is the fallback strategy for the GW selection in case the preferred one is not available. But still the client-node will not think about choosing a faster GW until the preferred GW has been purged. Once the preferred GW is not available anymore it uses the -r3 policy to switch between the remaining available GWs :-(
but with only two gateways, that's actually all i need :-)
Quoted 15 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Suggestion: in bmxd -cbd1 i saw nodes with lvld >400 before they get deleted, i think 180 should be more than enough, 3 minutes is plenty of time for normal reboot, and if a node dosn't send OGMs for more than that... it has a serious problem ;)
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Well, these long timeout defaults are kind of traditional remains from batmand-0.2. But, not constantly receiving OGMs from a distant node does not mean that the distant node has not send some or is down. And it also does not necessarily mean that the old route to this distant node does not work anymore. With 0.2 we sometimes observed paths to distant nodes via which only one OGMs was received within the current window-size (which was 128 seconds) and still the path was somehow usable.
Quoted 9 lines
another update:
You can slightly modify the purge interval by configuring the value used for the rudimentary DuplicateAddressDetection (--dad-timeout). Default is 100 which means that the DAD timeout is 100% of the (originator-interval * window-size). So 150 seconds by default. The daeomon also tells you about these values during startup: --dad-timeout 50 (which is the minimum allowed) will print:
Using duplicate-address-detection timeout 75s, purge timeout 160s, originator interval 1500ms, window size 100
o.k., i see, and thanks for the explaination
cheers
--Jan