zfcp: fix use after free bug
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 zfcp: fix use after free bug
From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
zfcp_erp_strategy_check_fsfreq() checks if it is safe to access the fsf_req associated with the erp_action that gets passed. To test if it is safe it accesses the fsf_req in order to get its index into the hash list. This is broken since the fsf_req might be freed already and the read index has no meaning. It could lead to memory corruption. Fix this by introducing a new zfcp_reqlist_find_safe() method which just checks if addresses are equal. This is slower, but only gets called in case of error recovery.
Signed-off-by Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by Swen Schillig <[email protected]>
---
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_def.h | 14 ++++++++++++++ drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_def.h +14 -0
@@ -1210,6 +1210,20 @@ zfcp_reqlist_find(struct zfcp_adapter *areturn NULL ; } +static inline struct zfcp_fsf_req * +zfcp_reqlist_find_safe (struct zfcp_adapter *adapter,struct zfcp_fsf_req *req) +{ +struct zfcp_fsf_req *request; +unsigned int idx; + +for (idx =0 ; idx <REQUEST_LIST_SIZE ; idx++) { +list_for_each_entry (request, &adapter->req_list[idx], list) +if (request == req) +return request; + } +return NULL ; +} +/* * functions needed for reference/usage counting */
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c +2 -1
@@ -837,7 +837,8 @@ zfcp_erp_strategy_check_fsfreq(struct zfif (erp_action->fsf_req) {/* take lock to ensure that request is not deleted meanwhile */ spin_lock (&adapter->req_list_lock); -if (zfcp_reqlist_find (adapter, erp_action->fsf_req->req_id)) { +if (zfcp_reqlist_find_safe (adapter, erp_action->fsf_req) && + erp_action->fsf_req->erp_action == erp_action) {/* fsf_req still exists */ debug_text_event (adapter->erp_dbf,3 ,"a_ca_req" ); debug_event(adapter->erp_dbf, 3, &erp_action->fsf_req,