mm: more likely reclaim MADV_SEQUENTIAL mappings
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 mm: more likely reclaim MADV_SEQUENTIAL mappings
File pages mapped only in sequentially read mappings are perfect reclaim canditates.
This patch makes these mappings behave like weak references, their pages will be reclaimed unless they have a strong reference from a normal mapping as well.
It changes the reclaim and the unmap path where they check if the page has been referenced. In both cases, accesses through sequentially read mappings will be ignored.
---
II: add likely()s to mitigate the extra branches a bit as to Nick's
suggestion
Benchmark results from KOSAKI Motohiro:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=122485301925098&w=2
mm/memory.c | 3 ++- mm/rmap.c | 13 +++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
mm/rmap.c +11 -2
@@ -337,8 +337,17 @@ static int page_referenced_one(struct pa goto out_unmap; } -if (ptep_clear_flush_young_notify (vma, address, pte)) - referenced++; +if (ptep_clear_flush_young_notify (vma, address, pte)) { +/* +* Don't treat a reference through a sequentially read +* mapping as such. If the page has been used in +* another mapping, we will catch it; if this other +* mapping is already gone, the unmap path will have +* set PG_referenced or activated the page. +*/ +if (likely (!VM_SequentialReadHint (vma))) + referenced++; + }/* Pretend the page is referenced if the task has the swap token and is in the middle of a page fault. */
mm/memory.c +2 -1
@@ -759,7 +759,8 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(strucelse {if (pte_dirty (ptent))set_page_dirty (page); -if (pte_young (ptent)) +if (pte_young (ptent) && +likely (!VM_SequentialReadHint (vma)))mark_page_accessed (page); file_rss--; }
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Andrew Morton
maintainerQuoted 53 lines · On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:55:13 +0100 Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> wrote:
File pages mapped only in sequentially read mappings are perfect reclaim canditates.
This patch makes these mappings behave like weak references, their pages will be reclaimed unless they have a strong reference from a normal mapping as well.
It changes the reclaim and the unmap path where they check if the page has been referenced. In both cases, accesses through sequentially read mappings will be ignored.
Signed-off-by Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Rik van Riel <[email protected]>Acked-by KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]>CC Nick Piggin <[email protected]>---
II: add likely()s to mitigate the extra branches a bit as to Nick's
suggestionBenchmark results from KOSAKI Motohiro:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=122485301925098&w=2mm/memory.c | 3 ++- mm/rmap.c | 13 +++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)mm/rmap.c +11
-2@@ -337,8 +337,17 @@ static int page_referenced_one(struct pa goto out_unmap; } -if (ptep_clear_flush_young_notify (vma, address, pte)) - referenced++; +if (ptep_clear_flush_young_notify (vma, address, pte)) { +/* +* Don't treat a reference through a sequentially read +* mapping as such. If the page has been used in +* another mapping, we will catch it; if this other +* mapping is already gone, the unmap path will have +* set PG_referenced or activated the page. +*/ +if (likely (!VM_SequentialReadHint (vma))) + referenced++; + }/* Pretend the page is referenced if the task has the swap token and is in the middle of a page fault. */
mm/memory.c static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struc · line 766
Quoted 9 lines
mm/memory.c +2
-1@@ -759,7 +759,8 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(strucelse {if (pte_dirty (ptent))set_page_dirty (page); -if (pte_young (ptent)) +if (pte_young (ptent) && +likely (!VM_SequentialReadHint (vma)))mark_page_accessed (page); file_rss--; }
Of course, in the majority of cases those applications which are performing sequential reads will have forgotten to call madvise(MADV_SEQUENTIAL).
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>