radix-tree: document wrap-around issue of radix_tree_next_hole()
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 radix-tree: document wrap-around issue of radix_tree_next_hole()
And some 80-line cleanups.
--- lib/radix-tree.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
lib/radix-tree.c +6 -5
@@ -640,13 +640,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(radix_tree_tag_get);* * Returns: the index of the hole if found, otherwise returns an index * outside of the set specified (in which case 'return - index >= max_scan' -* will be true). +* will be true). In rare cases of index wrap-around, 0 will be returned. * * radix_tree_next_hole may be called under rcu_read_lock. However, like -* radix_tree_gang_lookup, this will not atomically search a snapshot of the -* tree at a single point in time. For example, if a hole is created at index -* 5, then subsequently a hole is created at index 10, radix_tree_next_hole -* covering both indexes may return 10 if called under rcu_read_lock. +* radix_tree_gang_lookup, this will not atomically search a snapshot of +* the tree at a single point in time. For example, if a hole is created +* at index 5, then subsequently a hole is created at index 10, +* radix_tree_next_hole covering both indexes may return 10 if called +* under rcu_read_lock. */ unsigned long radix_tree_next_hole (struct radix_tree_root *root,unsigned long index,unsigned long max_scan)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Quoted 20 lines · Wu Fengguang
And some 80-line cleanups.
Signed-off-by Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>--- lib/radix-tree.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)lib/radix-tree.c +1
-3@@ -640,13 +640,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(radix_tree_tag_get);* * Returns: the index of the hole if found, otherwise returns an index * outside of the set specified (in which case 'return - index >= max_scan' -* will be true). +* will be true). In rare cases of index wrap-around, 0 will be returned. * * radix_tree_next_hole may be called under rcu_read_lock. However, like -* radix_tree_gang_lookup, this will not atomically search a snapshot of the -* tree at a single point in time. For example, if a hole is created at index
lib/radix-tree.c EXPORT_SYMBOL(radix_tree_tag_get); · line 653
Quoted 10 lines
lib/radix-tree.c +5
-2-* 5, then subsequently a hole is created at index 10, radix_tree_next_hole -* covering both indexes may return 10 if called under rcu_read_lock. +* radix_tree_gang_lookup, this will not atomically search a snapshot of +* the tree at a single point in time. For example, if a hole is created +* at index 5, then subsequently a hole is created at index 10, +* radix_tree_next_hole covering both indexes may return 10 if called +* under rcu_read_lock. */ unsigned long radix_tree_next_hole (struct radix_tree_root *root,unsigned long index,unsigned long max_scan)
I don't see this applied in any of the publically visible trees, so I have taken this into -trivial. Please let me know if it has been through any other channel already.
Thanks,
Signature · 8 lines
Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Quoted 28 lines · Jiri Kosina
Quoted 26 lines · Wu Fengguang
And some 80-line cleanups.
Signed-off-by Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>--- lib/radix-tree.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)lib/radix-tree.c +6
-5@@ -640,13 +640,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(radix_tree_tag_get);* * Returns: the index of the hole if found, otherwise returns an index * outside of the set specified (in which case 'return - index >= max_scan' -* will be true). +* will be true). In rare cases of index wrap-around, 0 will be returned. * * radix_tree_next_hole may be called under rcu_read_lock. However, like -* radix_tree_gang_lookup, this will not atomically search a snapshot of the -* tree at a single point in time. For example, if a hole is created at index -* 5, then subsequently a hole is created at index 10, radix_tree_next_hole -* covering both indexes may return 10 if called under rcu_read_lock. +* radix_tree_gang_lookup, this will not atomically search a snapshot of +* the tree at a single point in time. For example, if a hole is created +* at index 5, then subsequently a hole is created at index 10, +* radix_tree_next_hole covering both indexes may return 10 if called +* under rcu_read_lock.
Quoted 8 lines
lib/radix-tree.c EXPORT_SYMBOL(radix_tree_tag_get); · line 653
Quoted 4 lines
lib/radix-tree.c +0
-0*/ unsigned long radix_tree_next_hole (struct radix_tree_root *root,unsigned long index,unsigned long max_scan)I don't see this applied in any of the publically visible trees, so I have taken this into -trivial. Please let me know if it has been through any other channel already.
OK, thank you.
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>