Skip to contentSkip to conversation

XFS corruption on ARM

DISCUSSION Thomas Themel 3 participants 3 messages Dec 28, 2008 – Dec 29, 2008

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hi,

there was a thread[0] on this list in 2008-10 about XFS corrupting rather quickly on recent ARM kernels, which seems to have petered out without any apparent results. I'm still seeing the same problems with 2.6.28, and I suspect that this qualifies as a kind of regression (though ancient), since the devices I'm running this on (Buffalo LinkStations) originally ship with a (vendor-modified) 2.6.16 kernel, where XFS seems to be working.

Is this still on anyone's radar? I'm willing to test proposed fixes and supply data[1], but lack any deep knowledge of either ARM or XFS internals.

(Please Cc: me, I'm not on the list.)

[0] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/1/382
[1] Though mine doesn't look any different from what was posted in [0] to the little-trained eye.

ciao,

Signature · 4 lines
[*Thomas  Themel*]
[extended contact] But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay:
[info provided in] for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
[*message header*]      - Matthew 5:37
#1 lore raw

[CC'd the xfs list.]

Quoted 31 lines · Thomas Themel

Hi,

there was a thread[0] on this list in 2008-10 about XFS corrupting rather quickly on recent ARM kernels, which seems to have petered out without any apparent results. I'm still seeing the same problems with 2.6.28, and I suspect that this qualifies as a kind of regression (though ancient), since the devices I'm running this on (Buffalo LinkStations) originally ship with a (vendor-modified) 2.6.16 kernel, where XFS seems to be working.

Is this still on anyone's radar? I'm willing to test proposed fixes and supply data[1], but lack any deep knowledge of either ARM or XFS internals.

(Please Cc: me, I'm not on the list.)

[0] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/1/382
[1] Though mine doesn't look any different from what was posted in [0] to the little-trained eye.

ciao,

Signature · 9 lines
[*Thomas  Themel*]
[extended contact] But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay:
[info provided in] for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
[*message header*]      - Matthew 5:37
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Signature · 7 lines
Dave Chinner
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
#2 lore raw
Quoted 17 lines · Dave Chinner

[CC'd the xfs list.]

Quoted 14 lines · Thomas Themel

Hi,

there was a thread[0] on this list in 2008-10 about XFS corrupting rather quickly on recent ARM kernels, which seems to have petered out without any apparent results. I'm still seeing the same problems with 2.6.28, and I suspect that this qualifies as a kind of regression (though ancient), since the devices I'm running this on (Buffalo LinkStations) originally ship with a (vendor-modified) 2.6.16 kernel, where XFS seems to be working.

Is this still on anyone's radar? I'm willing to test proposed fixes and supply data[1], but lack any deep knowledge of either ARM or XFS internals.

(Please Cc: me, I'm not on the list.)

could be related to http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=755

-Eric

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines

[0] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/1/382
[1] Though mine doesn't look any different from what was posted in [0] to the little-trained eye.