NilFS cleanerd bugreport
Subsystems (2)
Dear folks, dear Ryusuke,
I've found a bug in the cleanerd/nilfs interaction that might give rise to the various problems we've seen recently with the cleanerd. It comes down to the wrong counting of the number of dirty segments and the wrong counting of the number of checkpoints.
I created this disc using the NiLFS version 2.05 with 2.06 userland (AFAIK) with mkfs.nilfs and created a sparse file on it with my sparse file generator I created for UDF testing. It dismounted fine giving a nilfs_dump vnd0e-dump-3'. When i remounted it again, the cleanerd started after a while and after unmounting it gives vnd03-dump-3-cleanerd'. A diff shows:
(superblock)
root/luiaard/root/vnd0e-dump-3-cleanerd renamed from root/luiaard/root/vnd0e-dump-3 +7 -7
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Flags 0x0000 CRC seed 0xd4dd3d5a - Checksum (CRC) 0x05ec6c58 (OK) + Checksum (CRC) 0xddd0a2f7 (OK) Blocksize 4096 Number of segments 499
@@ -17,15 +17,15 @@ Blocks per segment 2048 Reserved segments percent 5 - Last checkpoint number 8 - Last pseg blocknr writen 12288 + Last checkpoint number 11 + Last pseg blocknr writen 13726 Seq. number last segment 6 - Free blocks count 1005568 + Free blocks count 1015808 FS Creation time Sun Jan 25 17:05:10 2009 - FS last mount time Sun Jan 25 17:05:14 2009 - FS last write time Sun Jan 25 17:06:02 2009 + FS last mount time Wed Jan 28 17:21:25 2009 + FS last write time Wed Jan 28 17:21:44 2009 - Mount count 1 + Mount count 2 Max mount count 50 FS state 0x1<VALID_FS> Error behaviour flags 0x0001
And the su and cp files give:
@@ -30743,34 +31480,34 @@
Reading file SU.out for 1 blocks (4 Kb)
SU file dump
- nclean 491 - ndirty 8 + nclean 496 + ndirty 21474836483
last alloced 7
Segment 0
- Last modified Sun Jan 25 17:05:28 2009
- Containing nblks 2047
- Flags 0x2<DIRTY>
+ Last modified Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
+ Containing nblks 0
+ Flags 0x0
......
@@ -30789,136 +31526,72 @@
Reading file CP.out for 1 blocks (4 Kb)
CP file dump
- Number of checkpoints 8
+ Number of checkpoints 8589934596
Number of snapshots 0
Checkpoint number 1 - Flags 0x0 + Flags 0x2<INVALID> Checkpoints in block 0 Created at Sun Jan 25 17:05:10 2009 Blocks incremented 11 Inodes count 3 Blocks count (red.) 9
---------------------
ny idea as to if and why this can happen? Has it been fixed in the meantime? or could this be a clue as to the wierd behaviour seen by others including the corruption?
With regards,
Reinoud
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20090128205223.GA416-5cYspOl2ggRz6xQTk39kMVfVdRo2wo/[email protected]
Hi Reinoud,
Quoted 12 lines · Reinoud Zandijk
Dear folks, dear Ryusuke,
I've found a bug in the cleanerd/nilfs interaction that might give rise to the various problems we've seen recently with the cleanerd. It comes down to the wrong counting of the number of dirty segments and the wrong counting of the number of checkpoints.
I created this disc using the NiLFS version 2.05 with 2.06 userland (AFAIK) with mkfs.nilfs and created a sparse file on it with my sparse file generator I created for UDF testing. It dismounted fine giving a
nilfs_dumpvnd0e-dump-3'. When i remounted it again, the cleanerd started after a while and after unmounting it givesvnd03-dump-3-cleanerd'. A diff shows:
<snip>
Quoted 39 lines
And the su and cp files give:
(quoted diff) +7
-7@@ -30743,34 +31480,34 @@ Reading file `SU.out` for 1 blocks (4 Kb) SU file dump - nclean 491 - ndirty 8 + nclean 496 + ndirty 21474836483 last alloced 7 Segment 0 - Last modified Sun Jan 25 17:05:28 2009 - Containing nblks 2047 - Flags 0x2<DIRTY> + Last modified Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970 + Containing nblks 0 + Flags 0x0@@ -30789,136 +31526,72 @@ Reading file `CP.out` for 1 blocks (4 Kb) CP file dump - Number of checkpoints 8 + Number of checkpoints 8589934596 Number of snapshots 0 Checkpoint number 1 - Flags 0x0 + Flags 0x2<INVALID> Checkpoints in block 0 Created at Sun Jan 25 17:05:10 2009 Blocks incremented 11 Inodes count 3 Blocks count (red.) 9
Quoted 1 line
ny idea as to if and why this can happen?
looks underflow or collision of updates.
Quoted 1 line
Has it been fixed in the meantime?
Not yet, I think.
Quoted 2 lines
or could this be a clue as to the wierd behaviour seen by others including the corruption?
I don't know. As I remember, the cleanerd does not depend on these values, but it may be indirectly-induced.
Anyway, thanks for reporting this issue.
I'll review the cpfile and sufile again.
Regards,
Ryusuke Konishi
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Hi,
Quoted 54 lines · Ryusuke Konishi
Hi Reinoud,
Quoted 12 lines · Reinoud Zandijk
Dear folks, dear Ryusuke,
I've found a bug in the cleanerd/nilfs interaction that might give rise to the various problems we've seen recently with the cleanerd. It comes down to the wrong counting of the number of dirty segments and the wrong counting of the number of checkpoints.
I created this disc using the NiLFS version 2.05 with 2.06 userland (AFAIK) with mkfs.nilfs and created a sparse file on it with my sparse file generator I created for UDF testing. It dismounted fine giving a
nilfs_dumpvnd0e-dump-3'. When i remounted it again, the cleanerd started after a while and after unmounting it givesvnd03-dump-3-cleanerd'. A diff shows:<snip>
Quoted 39 lines
And the su and cp files give:
(quoted diff) +7
-7@@ -30743,34 +31480,34 @@ Reading file `SU.out` for 1 blocks (4 Kb) SU file dump - nclean 491 - ndirty 8 + nclean 496 + ndirty 21474836483 last alloced 7 Segment 0 - Last modified Sun Jan 25 17:05:28 2009 - Containing nblks 2047 - Flags 0x2<DIRTY> + Last modified Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970 + Containing nblks 0 + Flags 0x0@@ -30789,136 +31526,72 @@ Reading file `CP.out` for 1 blocks (4 Kb) CP file dump - Number of checkpoints 8 + Number of checkpoints 8589934596 Number of snapshots 0 Checkpoint number 1 - Flags 0x0 + Flags 0x2<INVALID> Checkpoints in block 0 Created at Sun Jan 25 17:05:10 2009 Blocks incremented 11 Inodes count 3 Blocks count (red.) 9
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
ny idea as to if and why this can happen?
looks underflow or collision of updates.
This turn out to be the bug of counter operations on the cpfile and sufile.
Here, I attach a test patch to fix the problem.
After some tests and submission to -mm tree, I'll push it to the git repo.
Reinoud, thank you for finding this problem.
Regards,
Ryusuke Konishi
--- fs/cpfile.c | 2 +- fs/sufile.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
fs/cpfile.c +1 -1
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ int nilfs_cpfile_delete_checkpoints(struct inode *cpfile, kaddr =kmap_atomic (header_bh->b_page,KM_USER0 ); header =nilfs_cpfile_block_get_header (cpfile, header_bh, kaddr); -le64_add_cpu (&header->ch_ncheckpoints, -tnicps); +le64_add_cpu (&header->ch_ncheckpoints, -(u64 )tnicps);nilfs_mdt_mark_buffer_dirty (header_bh);nilfs_mdt_mark_dirty (cpfile);kunmap_atomic (kaddr,KM_USER0 );
fs/sufile.c +1 -1
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ int nilfs_sufile_freev(struct inode *sufile, __u64 *segnum, size_t nsegs) kaddr =kmap_atomic (header_bh->b_page,KM_USER0 ); header =nilfs_sufile_block_get_header (sufile, header_bh, kaddr);le64_add_cpu (&header->sh_ncleansegs, nsegs); -le64_add_cpu (&header->sh_ndirtysegs, -nsegs); +le64_add_cpu (&header->sh_ndirtysegs, -(u64 )nsegs);kunmap_atomic (kaddr,KM_USER0 );nilfs_mdt_mark_buffer_dirty (header_bh);nilfs_mdt_mark_dirty (sufile);
Signature · 1 line
1.5.6.5