Skip to contentSkip to conversation

xfs_trans_read_buf error / xfs_force_shutdown with LVM snapshot and Xen kernel 2.6.18

DISCUSSION Wolfram Schlich 2 participants 3 messages Jun 18, 2009

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hi!

I'm currently using LVM snapshots to create full system backups of a bunch of Xen-based virtual machines (so-called domUs). Those domUs all run Xen kernel 2.6.18 from the Xen 3.2.0 release (32bit domU on 32bit dom0, I can post the .config if needed). All domUs are using XFS on their LVM logical volumes. The backup of all mounted snapshot volumes is made using rsnapshot/rsync. This has been running smoothly for some weeks now on 5 domUs.

Yesterday this happened during the backup on 1 domU:
--8<--
kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-21") meta-data dev dm-21 block 0x604d68 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 4096
kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-21") meta-data dev dm-21 block 0x66c5a0 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 4096
kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-21") meta-data dev dm-21 block 0x202f70 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 4096
kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-21") meta-data dev dm-21 block 0x2701f8 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 4096
kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-21") meta-data dev dm-21 block 0x6a78 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 4096
kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-21") meta-data dev dm-21 block 0x600500 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 8192
kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-21") meta-data dev dm-21 block 0x600520 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 8192
kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-21") meta-data dev dm-21 block 0x600520 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 8192
kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-21") meta-data dev dm-21 block 0xdd0 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 8192
kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-21") meta-data dev dm-21 block 0x4055d0 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 8192
[...many more of such messages...]
kernel: xfs_force_shutdown(dm-21,0x1) called from line 424 of file fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c. Return address = 0xc02b1cbb
kernel: Filesystem "dm-21": I/O Error Detected. Shutting down filesystem: dm-21
kernel: Please umount the filesystem, and rectify the problem(s)
kernel: xfs_force_shutdown(dm-21,0x1) called from line 424 of file fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c. Return address = 0xc02b1cbb --8<--
The rsync process was then terminated with SIGBUS (exit code 135 -> 128+7).

The device dm-21 was the snapshot of the /var filesystem and was mounted using nouuid,norecovery.

Is it possible that the LVM snapshot (that should be using xfs_freeze/xfs_unfreeze) has created an inconsistent/damaged snapshot that was kept from being repaired through norecovery? Any other ideas?

Signature · 8 lines
Regards,
Wolfram Schlich <[email protected]>
Gentoo Linux * http://dev.gentoo.org/~wschlich/

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
#1 lore raw
Quoted 11 lines · Wolfram Schlich

Hi!

I'm currently using LVM snapshots to create full system backups of a bunch of Xen-based virtual machines (so-called domUs). Those domUs all run Xen kernel 2.6.18 from the Xen 3.2.0 release (32bit domU on 32bit dom0, I can post the .config if needed). All domUs are using XFS on their LVM logical volumes. The backup of all mounted snapshot volumes is made using rsnapshot/rsync. This has been running smoothly for some weeks now on 5 domUs.

Quoted 13 lines

Yesterday this happened during the backup on 1 domU:
--8<--
kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-21") meta-data dev dm-21 block 0x604d68 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 4096
kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-21") meta-data dev dm-21 block 0x66c5a0 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 4096
kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-21") meta-data dev dm-21 block 0x202f70 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 4096
kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-21") meta-data dev dm-21 block 0x2701f8 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 4096
kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-21") meta-data dev dm-21 block 0x6a78 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 4096
kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-21") meta-data dev dm-21 block 0x600500 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 8192
kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-21") meta-data dev dm-21 block 0x600520 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 8192
kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-21") meta-data dev dm-21 block 0x600520 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 8192
kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-21") meta-data dev dm-21 block 0xdd0 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 8192
kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-21") meta-data dev dm-21 block 0x4055d0 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 8192
[...many more of such messages...]

Well these are all I/O errors happening -to- xfs, so xfs is unlikely to be at fault here. Any block layer messages before that?

Quoted 8 lines

kernel: xfs_force_shutdown(dm-21,0x1) called from line 424 of file fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c. Return address = 0xc02b1cbb
kernel: Filesystem "dm-21": I/O Error Detected. Shutting down filesystem: dm-21
kernel: Please umount the filesystem, and rectify the problem(s)
kernel: xfs_force_shutdown(dm-21,0x1) called from line 424 of file fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c. Return address = 0xc02b1cbb

--8<--
The rsync process was then terminated with SIGBUS (exit code 135 -> 128+7).

Quoted 7 lines

The device dm-21 was the snapshot of the /var filesystem and was mounted using nouuid,norecovery.

Is it possible that the LVM snapshot (that should be using xfs_freeze/xfs_unfreeze) has created an inconsistent/damaged snapshot that was kept from being repaired through norecovery? Any other ideas?

If it was a proper snapshot norecovery shouldn't matter, as the fs should be clean already (well, hopefully, 2.6.18 was a long time ago; this is true today, anyway)

I suppose it's possible that the snapshot was not consistent, and you're hitting problems there, but things like:

Quoted 1 line

kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-21") meta-data dev dm-21 block

0xdd0 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 8192

looks like a failure to read a perfectly normal block, not out of bounds or anything, so I'd most likely point to problems outside xfs.

-Eric

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

#2 lore raw
Quoted 12 lines · Eric Sandeen
Quoted 11 lines · Wolfram Schlich

Hi!

I'm currently using LVM snapshots to create full system backups of a bunch of Xen-based virtual machines (so-called domUs). Those domUs all run Xen kernel 2.6.18 from the Xen 3.2.0 release (32bit domU on 32bit dom0, I can post the .config if needed). All domUs are using XFS on their LVM logical volumes. The backup of all mounted snapshot volumes is made using rsnapshot/rsync. This has been running smoothly for some weeks now on 5 domUs.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Yesterday this happened during the backup on 1 domU:
--8<--
kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-21") meta-data dev dm-21 block 0x604d68 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 4096

[...]

Quoted 1 line

[...many more of such messages...]

Well these are all I/O errors happening -to- xfs, so xfs is unlikely to be at fault here. Any block layer messages before that?

Unfortunately not a single one :(

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines

Is it possible that the LVM snapshot (that should be using xfs_freeze/xfs_unfreeze) has created an inconsistent/damaged snapshot that was kept from being repaired through norecovery? Any other ideas?

If it was a proper snapshot norecovery shouldn't matter, as the fs should be clean already (well, hopefully, 2.6.18 was a long time ago; this is true today, anyway)

Ok.

Quoted 8 lines

I suppose it's possible that the snapshot was not consistent, and you're hitting problems there, but things like:

Quoted 1 line

kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-21") meta-data dev dm-21 block

0xdd0 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 8192

looks like a failure to read a perfectly normal block, not out of bounds or anything, so I'd most likely point to problems outside xfs.

I've now traced it back to LVM. It seems that the LVM snapshot volume we were backing up at that time ran out of space and thus was automatically removed (thus, the block device which the XFS was on vanished).

Stupid LVM does not log ANYTHING when it just deletes a snapshot running out of space :( I've now activated dmeventd which *does* log such events *sigh*

Thanks!

Signature · 8 lines
Regards,
Wolfram Schlich <[email protected]>
Gentoo Linux * http://dev.gentoo.org/~wschlich/

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs