Endless loop in git whatchanged --graph -m
Steps to reproduce:
(Simple merge of two branches)
$ mkdir a && cd a && git init
$ echo file1 > file1
$ git add file1 && git commit -m initial
$ echo file1 >> file1
$ git commit -a -m "commit on master"
$ git checkout -b experimental HEAD^
$ echo file2 > file2
$ git add file2 && git commit -m "commit on experimental"
$ git checkout master && git merge experimental
$ git whatchanged --graph -m
<endless loop here>
Here is a simple patch, which solves this problem by removing constraint from git_show_commit(). I'm not sure if this is the best solution. Maybe some upper layer shouldn't call git_show_commit()?
---
Documentation/technical/api-history-graph.txt +5 -5
@@ -36,11 +36,11 @@ The following utility functions are wrappers around `graph_next_line()` and They can all be called with a NULL graph argument, in which case no graph output will be printed. -* `graph_show_commit()` calls `graph_next_line()` until it returns non-zero. - This prints all graph lines up to, and including, the line containing this - commit. Output is printed to stdout. The last line printed does not contain - a terminating newline. This should not be called if the commit line has - already been printed, or it will loop forever. +* `graph_show_commit()` calls `graph_next_line()` and + `graph_is_commit_finished()` until one of them return non-zero. This prints + all graph lines up to, and including, the line containing this commit. + Output is printed to stdout. The last line printed does not contain a + terminating newline. * `graph_show_oneline()` calls `graph_next_line()` and prints the result to stdout. The line printed does not contain a terminating newline.
graph.c +1 -1
@@ -1198,7 +1198,7 @@ void graph_show_commit(struct git_graph *graph)if (!graph)return ; -while (!shown_commit_line) { +while (!shown_commit_line && !graph_is_commit_finished (graph)) { shown_commit_line =graph_next_line (graph, &msgbuf);fwrite (msgbuf.buf,sizeof (char ), msgbuf.len, stdout);if (!shown_commit_line)
Quoted 54 lines · Michał Kiedrowicz
Steps to reproduce:
(Simple merge of two branches)
$ mkdir a && cd a && git init
$ echo file1 > file1
$ git add file1 && git commit -m initial$ echo file1 >> file1
$ git commit -a -m "commit on master"$ git checkout -b experimental HEAD^
$ echo file2 > file2
$ git add file2 && git commit -m "commit on experimental"$ git checkout master && git merge experimental
$ git whatchanged --graph -m
<endless loop here>Here is a simple patch, which solves this problem by removing constraint from
git_show_commit(). I'm not sure if this is the best solution. Maybe some upper layer shouldn't callgit_show_commit()?Signed-off-by Michał Kiedrowicz <[email protected]>---
Documentation/technical/api-history-graph.txt +5
-5@@ -36,11 +36,11 @@ The following utility functions are wrappers around `graph_next_line()` and They can all be called with a NULL graph argument, in which case no graph output will be printed. -* `graph_show_commit()` calls `graph_next_line()` until it returns non-zero. - This prints all graph lines up to, and including, the line containing this - commit. Output is printed to stdout. The last line printed does not contain - a terminating newline. This should not be called if the commit line has - already been printed, or it will loop forever. +* `graph_show_commit()` calls `graph_next_line()` and + `graph_is_commit_finished()` until one of them return non-zero. This prints + all graph lines up to, and including, the line containing this commit. + Output is printed to stdout. The last line printed does not contain a + terminating newline. * `graph_show_oneline()` calls `graph_next_line()` and prints the result to stdout. The line printed does not contain a terminating newline.graph.c +0
-0
graph.c void graph_show_commit(struct git_graph *graph) · line 1204
Quoted 8 lines
graph.c +1
-1@@ -1198,7 +1198,7 @@ void graph_show_commit(struct git_graph *graph)if (!graph)return ; -while (!shown_commit_line) { +while (!shown_commit_line && !graph_is_commit_finished (graph)) { shown_commit_line =graph_next_line (graph, &msgbuf);fwrite (msgbuf.buf,sizeof (char ), msgbuf.len, stdout);if (!shown_commit_line)
Hi, has anyone looked at this?
Michał Kiedrowicz