Deny CLONE_PARENT|CLONE_NEWPID combination
PATCH 1/1 Deny CLONE_PARENT|CLONE_NEWPID combination
Deny CLONE_PARENT|CLONE_NEWPID combination.
CLONE_PARENT was used to implement an older threading model. For consistency with the CLONE_THREAD check in copy_pid_ns(), disable CLONE_PARENT and CLONE_SIGHAND with CLONE_NEWPID, at least until the required semantics of the pid namespaces are clear.
Changelog[v3]:
Remove CLONE_SIGHAND and for now only fail CLONE_NEWPID|CLONE_PARENT.
Changelog[v2]:
[Eric Biederman] Disable CLONE_SIGHAND also ?
--- kernel/pid_namespace.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
kernel/pid_namespace.c +1 -1
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ {if (!(flags &CLONE_NEWPID ))return get_pid_ns (old_ns); -if (flags &CLONE_THREAD ) +if (flags & (CLONE_THREAD |CLONE_PARENT ))return ERR_PTR (-EINVAL );return create_pid_namespace (old_ns); }
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20090728164406.GA17275-r/[email protected]
Quoted 10 lines · Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Deny CLONE_PARENT|CLONE_NEWPID combination.
CLONE_PARENTwas used to implement an older threading model. For consistency with theCLONE_THREADcheck incopy_pid_ns(), disableCLONE_PARENTandCLONE_SIGHANDwithCLONE_NEWPID, at least until the required semantics of the pid namespaces are clear.Changelog[v3]:
RemoveCLONE_SIGHANDand for now only fail CLONE_NEWPID|CLONE_PARENT.
(FWIW your patch description does not reflect this...)
Quoted 23 lines
Changelog[v2]:
[Eric Biederman] DisableCLONE_SIGHANDalso ?Signed-off-by Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev-r/[email protected]>Acked-by Roland McGrath <[email protected]>--- kernel/pid_namespace.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)Index:
linux-mmotm/kernel/pid_namespace.c
===================================================================kernel/pid_namespace.c +1
-1@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ {if (!(flags &CLONE_NEWPID ))return get_pid_ns (old_ns); -if (flags &CLONE_THREAD ) +if (flags & (CLONE_THREAD |CLONE_PARENT ))return ERR_PTR (-EINVAL );return create_pid_namespace (old_ns); }
Quoted 10 lines · Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Deny CLONE_PARENT|CLONE_NEWPID combination.
CLONE_PARENTwas used to implement an older threading model. For consistency with theCLONE_THREADcheck incopy_pid_ns(), disableCLONE_PARENTandCLONE_SIGHANDwithCLONE_NEWPID, at least until the required semantics of the pid namespaces are clear.Changelog[v3]:
RemoveCLONE_SIGHANDand for now only fail CLONE_NEWPID|CLONE_PARENT.
(FWIW your patch description does not reflect this...)
Quoted 23 lines
Changelog[v2]:
[Eric Biederman] DisableCLONE_SIGHANDalso ?Signed-off-by Sukadev Bhattiprolu <[email protected]>Acked-by Roland McGrath <[email protected]>Acked-by Serge Hallyn <[email protected]>--- kernel/pid_namespace.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)Index:
linux-mmotm/kernel/pid_namespace.c
===================================================================kernel/pid_namespace.c +1
-1@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ {if (!(flags &CLONE_NEWPID ))return get_pid_ns (old_ns); -if (flags &CLONE_THREAD ) +if (flags & (CLONE_THREAD |CLONE_PARENT ))return ERR_PTR (-EINVAL );return create_pid_namespace (old_ns); }
Serge E. Hallyn [[email protected]] wrote:
| Quoting Sukadev Bhattiprolu ([email protected]): | > | > Deny CLONE_PARENT|CLONE_NEWPID combination. | > | > CLONE_PARENT was used to implement an older threading model. For consistency | > with the CLONE_THREAD check in copy_pid_ns(), disable CLONE_PARENT and | > CLONE_SIGHAND with CLONE_NEWPID, at least until the required semantics of | > the pid namespaces are clear. | > | > Changelog[v3]: | > Remove CLONE_SIGHAND and for now only fail CLONE_NEWPID|CLONE_PARENT. | | (FWIW your patch description does not reflect this...)
You are right. Here is the patch with updated description.
---
Deny CLONE_PARENT|CLONE_NEWPID|CLONE_SIGHAND combination.
CLONE_PARENT was used to implement an older threading model. For consistency with the CLONE_THREAD check in copy_pid_ns(), disable CLONE_PARENT with CLONE_NEWPID, at least until the required semantics of pid namespaces are clear.
Changelog[v3]:
Remove CLONE_SIGHAND and for now only fail CLONE_NEWPID|CLONE_PARENT.
Changelog[v2]:
[Eric Biederman] Disable CLONE_SIGHAND also ?
--- kernel/pid_namespace.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
kernel/pid_namespace.c +1 -1
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ {if (!(flags &CLONE_NEWPID ))return get_pid_ns (old_ns); -if (flags &CLONE_THREAD ) +if (flags & (CLONE_THREAD |CLONE_PARENT ))return ERR_PTR (-EINVAL );return create_pid_namespace (old_ns); }
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20090728180553.GB6427-r/[email protected]
Serge E. Hallyn [serue-r/[email protected]] wrote:
| Quoting Sukadev Bhattiprolu ([email protected]): | > | > Deny CLONE_PARENT|CLONE_NEWPID combination. | > | > CLONE_PARENT was used to implement an older threading model. For consistency | > with the CLONE_THREAD check in copy_pid_ns(), disable CLONE_PARENT and | > CLONE_SIGHAND with CLONE_NEWPID, at least until the required semantics of | > the pid namespaces are clear. | > | > Changelog[v3]: | > Remove CLONE_SIGHAND and for now only fail CLONE_NEWPID|CLONE_PARENT. | | (FWIW your patch description does not reflect this...)
You are right. Here is the patch with updated description.
---
Deny CLONE_PARENT|CLONE_NEWPID|CLONE_SIGHAND combination.
CLONE_PARENT was used to implement an older threading model. For consistency with the CLONE_THREAD check in copy_pid_ns(), disable CLONE_PARENT with CLONE_NEWPID, at least until the required semantics of pid namespaces are clear.
Changelog[v3]:
Remove CLONE_SIGHAND and for now only fail CLONE_NEWPID|CLONE_PARENT.
Changelog[v2]:
[Eric Biederman] Disable CLONE_SIGHAND also ?
--- kernel/pid_namespace.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
kernel/pid_namespace.c +1 -1
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ {if (!(flags &CLONE_NEWPID ))return get_pid_ns (old_ns); -if (flags &CLONE_THREAD ) +if (flags & (CLONE_THREAD |CLONE_PARENT ))return ERR_PTR (-EINVAL );return create_pid_namespace (old_ns); }