proc: drop write permission on 'timer_list' and 'slabinfo'
PATCH 1/1 proc: drop write permission on 'timer_list' and 'slabinfo'
/proc/timer_list and /proc/slabinfo are not supposed to be written, so there should be no write permissions on it.
---
kernel/time/timer_list.c +1 -1
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static int __init init_timer_list_procfs(void) {struct proc_dir_entry *pe; - pe =proc_create ("timer_list" ,0644 ,NULL , &timer_list_fops); + pe =proc_create ("timer_list" ,0444 ,NULL , &timer_list_fops);if (!pe)return -ENOMEM ;return 0 ;
mm/slab.c +1 -1
@@ -4473,7 +4473,7 @@ static const struct file_operations proc_slabstats_operations = {static int __init slab_proc_init (void ) { -proc_create ("slabinfo" ,S_IWUSR |S_IRUGO ,NULL ,&proc_slabinfo_operations); +proc_create ("slabinfo" ,S_IRUSR |S_IRUGO ,NULL ,&proc_slabinfo_operations);#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB_LEAK proc_create ("slab_allocators" ,0 ,NULL , &proc_slabstats_operations);#endif
mm/slub.c +1 -1
@@ -4726,7 +4726,7 @@ static const struct file_operations proc_slabinfo_operations = {static int __init slab_proc_init (void ) { -proc_create ("slabinfo" ,S_IWUSR |S_IRUGO ,NULL ,&proc_slabinfo_operations); +proc_create ("slabinfo" ,S_IRUSR |S_IRUGO ,NULL ,&proc_slabinfo_operations);return 0 ; }module_init (slab_proc_init);
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Quoted 2 lines · Amerigo Wang
/proc/timer_listand/proc/slabinfoare not supposed to be written, so there should be no write permissions on it.
good catch!
kernel/time/timer_list.c
Quoted 2 lines
kernel/time/timer_list.c +0
-0
I have applied the timer_list bits to the timer tree. The SLUB/SLAB bits should go into the SLAB tree i guess.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
[tip:timers/urgent] timers: Drop write permission on /proc/timer_list
In reply to Amerigo WangCommit-ID: de809347aeef0a68c04576c464414d0e4dce59fc Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/de809347aeef0a68c04576c464414d0e4dce59fc Author: Amerigo Wang <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 05:43:01 -0400 Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> CommitDate: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:47:31 +0200
timers: Drop write permission on /proc/timer_list
/proc/timer_list and /proc/slabinfo are not supposed to be written, so there should be no write permissions on it.
LKML-Reference: <[email protected]>
--- kernel/time/timer_list.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
kernel/time/timer_list.c +1 -1
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static int __init init_timer_list_procfs(void) {struct proc_dir_entry *pe; - pe =proc_create ("timer_list" ,0644 ,NULL , &timer_list_fops); + pe =proc_create ("timer_list" ,0444 ,NULL , &timer_list_fops);if (!pe)return -ENOMEM ;return 0 ;
Quoted 5 lines · Ingo Molnar
Quoted 2 lines · Amerigo Wang
/proc/timer_listand/proc/slabinfoare not supposed to be written, so there should be no write permissions on it.
Quoted 7 lines
good catch!
kernel/time/timer_list.c
Quoted 2 lines
kernel/time/timer_list.c +0
-0I have applied the
timer_listbits to the timer tree. The SLUB/SLAB bits should go into the SLAB tree i guess.
Yeah, I'll grab the slab parts to slab.git if I don't see a separate patch in my inbox when I get home. Thanks!
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Quoted 5 lines · Pekka Enberg
Quoted 2 lines
I have applied the
timer_listbits to the timer tree. The SLUB/SLAB bits should go into the SLAB tree i guess.Yeah, I'll grab the slab parts to slab.git if I don't see a separate patch in my inbox when I get home. Thanks!
slab needs the write permissions for tuning!
Hi Christoph,
Quoted 8 lines · Christoph Lameter
Quoted 4 lines · Pekka Enberg
Quoted 2 lines
I have applied the
timer_listbits to the timer tree. The SLUB/SLAB bits should go into the SLAB tree i guess.Yeah, I'll grab the slab parts to slab.git if I don't see a separate patch in my inbox when I get home. Thanks!
slab needs the write permissions for tuning!
Oh, crap, you're right, I had forgotten about that. It's probably best to keep slub permissions as-is, no?
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Quoted 4 lines · Pekka Enberg
Quoted 1 line
slab needs the write permissions for tuning!
Oh, crap, you're right, I had forgotten about that. It's probably best to keep slub permissions as-is, no?
slub perms can be changed. The patch is okay for that. But there is no write method in slub. Effectively it makes no difference. Just the display is nicer in /proc.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Quoted 8 lines · Christoph Lameter
Quoted 5 lines · Pekka Enberg
Quoted 2 lines
slab needs the write permissions for tuning!
Oh, crap, you're right, I had forgotten about that. It's probably best to keep slub permissions as-is, no?
Oops! I misread the code... sorry.
Quoted 7 lines
slub perms can be changed. The patch is okay for that. But there is no write method in slub. Effectively it makes no difference. Just the display is nicer in /proc.
Ah, ok, I update this part of patch, attached.
Thanks!
mm/slub.c +1 -1
@@ -4726,7 +4726,7 @@ static const struct file_operations proc_slabinfo_operations = {static int __init slab_proc_init (void ) { -proc_create ("slabinfo" ,S_IWUSR |S_IRUGO ,NULL ,&proc_slabinfo_operations); +proc_create ("slabinfo" ,S_IRUSR |S_IRUGO ,NULL ,&proc_slabinfo_operations);return 0 ; }module_init (slab_proc_init);
mm/slub.c static const struct file_operations proc_slabinfo_operations = { · line 4729
Quoted 4 lines
static int
__initslab_proc_init(void)
{mm/slub.c +1
-1-proc_create ("slabinfo" ,S_IWUSR |S_IRUGO ,NULL ,&proc_slabinfo_operations); +proc_create ("slabinfo" ,S_IRUSR |S_IRUGO ,NULL ,&proc_slabinfo_operations);
S_IRUSR|S_IRUGO == S_IRUGO
Quoted 3 lines
return 0;
}
module_init(slab_proc_init);
Quoted 9 lines · Li Zefan
Review
Quoted 5 lines
static int
__initslab_proc_init(void)
{(quoted diff) +1
-1- proc_create("slabinfo",S_IWUSR|S_IRUGO,NULL,&proc_slabinfo_operations); + proc_create("slabinfo",S_IRUSR|S_IRUGO,NULL,&proc_slabinfo_operations);S_IRUSR|S_IRUGO ==
S_IRUGO
Ah, yeah. Thanks!
Update it.
mm/slub.c +1 -1
@@ -4726,7 +4726,7 @@ static const struct file_operations proc_slabinfo_operations = {static int __init slab_proc_init (void ) { -proc_create ("slabinfo" ,S_IWUSR |S_IRUGO ,NULL ,&proc_slabinfo_operations); +proc_create ("slabinfo" ,S_IRUGO ,NULL ,&proc_slabinfo_operations);return 0 ; }module_init (slab_proc_init);
mm/slub.c static const struct file_operations proc_slabinfo_operations = { · line 4729
Quoted 2 lines · Amerigo Wang
mm/slub.c +1
-1-proc_create ("slabinfo" ,S_IWUSR |S_IRUGO ,NULL ,&proc_slabinfo_operations); +proc_create ("slabinfo" ,S_IRUGO ,NULL ,&proc_slabinfo_operations);
Style nitpick. The spaces were packed to fit into 80-col I guess.
ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
#10: FILE: mm/slub.c:4729:
+ proc_create("slabinfo",S_IRUGO,NULL,&proc_slabinfo_operations);
^ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
#10: FILE: mm/slub.c:4729:
+ proc_create("slabinfo",S_IRUGO,NULL,&proc_slabinfo_operations);
^ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxO)
#10: FILE: mm/slub.c:4729:
+ proc_create("slabinfo",S_IRUGO,NULL,&proc_slabinfo_operations);
^ERROR: space required before that '&' (ctx:OxV)
#10: FILE: mm/slub.c:4729:
+ proc_create("slabinfo",S_IRUGO,NULL,&proc_slabinfo_operations);
^Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Quoted 11 lines · Li Zefan
mm/slub.c static const struct file_operations proc_slabinfo_operations = { · line 4729
Quoted 4 lines
static int
__initslab_proc_init(void)
{mm/slub.c +1
-1-proc_create ("slabinfo" ,S_IWUSR |S_IRUGO ,NULL ,&proc_slabinfo_operations); +proc_create ("slabinfo" ,S_IRUSR |S_IRUGO ,NULL ,&proc_slabinfo_operations);S_IRUSR|S_IRUGO ==
S_IRUGOQuoted 3 lines
return 0;
}
module_init(slab_proc_init);
I went ahead and fixed that. Applied, thanks everyone!
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Quoted 10 lines · Wu Fengguang
mm/slub.c static const struct file_operations proc_slabinfo_operations = { · line 4729
Quoted 3 lines · Amerigo Wang
mm/slub.c +1
-1-proc_create ("slabinfo" ,S_IWUSR |S_IRUGO ,NULL ,&proc_slabinfo_operations); +proc_create ("slabinfo" ,S_IRUGO ,NULL ,&proc_slabinfo_operations);Style nitpick. The spaces were packed to fit into 80-col I guess.
Yeah, I noticed this too, the reason I didn't fix this is that I don't want to mix coding style fix with this one. We can fix it in another patch, if you want. :)
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Quoted 12 lines · Amerigo Wang
Quoted 10 lines · Wu Fengguang
mm/slub.c static const struct file_operations proc_slabinfo_operations = { · line 4729
Quoted 3 lines · Amerigo Wang
mm/slub.c +1
-1-proc_create ("slabinfo" ,S_IWUSR |S_IRUGO ,NULL ,&proc_slabinfo_operations); +proc_create ("slabinfo" ,S_IRUGO ,NULL ,&proc_slabinfo_operations);Style nitpick. The spaces were packed to fit into 80-col I guess.
Quoted 3 lines
Yeah, I noticed this too, the reason I didn't fix this is that I don't want to mix coding style fix with this one. We can fix it in another patch, if you want. :)
Why not? This don't hurt readability of the patch, hehe.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Quoted 16 lines · Wu Fengguang
Quoted 14 lines · Amerigo Wang
Quoted 12 lines · Wu Fengguang
Review
Quoted 4 lines · Amerigo Wang
(quoted diff) +1
-1- proc_create("slabinfo",S_IWUSR|S_IRUGO,NULL,&proc_slabinfo_operations); + proc_create("slabinfo",S_IRUGO,NULL,&proc_slabinfo_operations);Style nitpick. The spaces were packed to fit into 80-col I guess.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Yeah, I noticed this too, the reason I didn't fix this is that I don't want to mix coding style fix with this one. We can fix it in another patch, if you want. :)
Why not? This don't hurt readability of the patch, hehe.
Here we go.
Pekka, could you please also take the patch attached below? It is just a trivial coding style fix. And it is based on the my previous patch.
Thanks!
mm/slub.c +3 -4
@@ -1109,8 +1109,7 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node) }if (kmemcheck_enabled - && !(s->flags & (SLAB_NOTRACK |DEBUG_DEFAULT_FLAGS ))) - { + && !(s->flags & (SLAB_NOTRACK |DEBUG_DEFAULT_FLAGS ))) {int pages =1 <<oo_order (oo);kmemcheck_alloc_shadow (page,oo_order (oo), flags, node);
@@ -2001,7 +2000,7 @@ static inline int calculate_order(int size)return order; fraction /=2 ; } - min_objects --; + min_objects--; }/*
@@ -4726,7 +4725,7 @@ static const struct file_operations proc_slabinfo_operations = {static int __init slab_proc_init (void ) { -proc_create ("slabinfo" ,S_IRUGO ,NULL ,&proc_slabinfo_operations); +proc_create ("slabinfo" ,S_IRUGO ,NULL , &proc_slabinfo_operations);return 0 ; }module_init (slab_proc_init);
Quoted 1 line · Amerigo Wang
Pekka, could you please also take the patch attached below? It is just a trivial coding style fix. And it is based on the my previous patch.
The last hunk was already in slab.git because I fixed your patch up by hand. I applied the rest but can you please send proper patches in the future? That is, no attachments and a "git am" friendly subject line. Thanks!
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Quoted 4 lines · Pekka Enberg
Quoted 1 line · Amerigo Wang
Pekka, could you please also take the patch attached below? It is just a trivial coding style fix. And it is based on the my previous patch.
The last hunk was already in slab.git because I fixed your patch up by hand. I applied the rest but can you please send proper patches in the future? That is, no attachments and a "git am" friendly subject line. Thanks!
Nice. Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>