s5pc110: Reduce the iodesc length of systimer
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 s5pc110: Reduce the iodesc length of systimer
From: Kyungmin Park <[email protected]>
It's enough to use 4KiB.
---
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c +1 -1
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static struct map_desc s5pv210_iodesc[] __initdata = { { .virtual = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_SYSTIMER, .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(S5PV210_PA_SYSTIMER), - .length = SZ_1M, + .length = SZ_4K, .type = MT_DEVICE, }, { .virtual = (unsigned long)VA_VIC2,
PATCH 1/1 s5pc110: Reduce the iodesc length of systimer
Quoted 6 lines · Kyungmin Park
From: Kyungmin Park <[email protected]>
It's enough to use 4KiB.
Signed-off-by Kyungmin Park <[email protected]>
Where is submitter(kmpark at infradead.org)'s Signed-off-by? I know submitter and author in here are same...but e-mail. So added 'From' in your patch.
It would be helpful to me if you use same e-mail in a patch.
Also, the commit message needs to be more descriptive.
Quoted 7 lines
---
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c +0
-0
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c static struct map_desc s5pv210_iodesc[] __initdata = { · line 47
Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c +1
-1@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static struct map_desc s5pv210_iodesc[] __initdata = { { .virtual = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_SYSTIMER, .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(S5PV210_PA_SYSTIMER), - .length = SZ_1M, + .length = SZ_4K, .type = MT_DEVICE, }, { .virtual = (unsigned long)VA_VIC2,
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <[email protected]>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
PATCH 1/1 s5pc110: Reduce the iodesc length of systimer
In reply to Kyungmin ParkQuoted 9 lines · Kukjin Kim
Quoted 6 lines · Kyungmin Park
From: Kyungmin Park <[email protected]>
It's enough to use 4KiB.
Signed-off-by Kyungmin Park <[email protected]>
Quoted 8 lines
Where is submitter(kmpark at infradead.org)'s Signed-off-by? I know submitter and author in here are same...but e-mail. So added 'From' in your patch.
It would be helpful to me if you use same e-mail in a patch.
Also, the commit message needs to be more descriptive.
I mean following is better.
'This patch reduces the iodesc length of System Timer from 1M to 4K.'
May I apply this patch with above modified message?
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
---
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c +0
-0@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static struct map_desc s5pv210_iodesc[] __initdata = { {
Quoted 9 lines
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c static struct map_desc s5pv210_iodesc[] __initdata = { · line 47
Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c +1
-1.virtual = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_SYSTIMER, .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(S5PV210_PA_SYSTIMER), - .length = SZ_1M, + .length = SZ_4K, .type = MT_DEVICE, }, { .virtual = (unsigned long)VA_VIC2,
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <[email protected]>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
PATCH 1/1 s5pc110: Reduce the iodesc length of systimer
In reply to Kukjin KimHi Andrew,
Can you explain Mr. Kim request?
As your suggestion, If the sender and signed-off are different, add the From filed at body.
I think no need to add duplicated signed-off since it's same person.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
Quoted 41 lines · Kukjin Kim
Quoted 6 lines · Kyungmin Park
From: Kyungmin Park <[email protected]>
It's enough to use 4KiB.
Signed-off-by Kyungmin Park <[email protected]>Where is submitter(kmpark at infradead.org)'s Signed-off-by? I know submitter and author in here are same...but e-mail. So added 'From' in your patch.
It would be helpful to me if you use same e-mail in a patch.
Also, the commit message needs to be more descriptive.
Quoted 7 lines
---
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c +0
-0arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c static struct map_desc s5pv210_iodesc[] __initdata = { · line 47
Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c +1
-1@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static struct map_desc s5pv210_iodesc[] __initdata = { ? ? ? { ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .virtual ? ? ? ?= (unsigned long)S5P_VA_SYSTIMER, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .pfn ? ? ? ? ? ?= __phys_to_pfn(S5PV210_PA_SYSTIMER), - ? ? ? ? ? ? .length ? ? ? ? = SZ_1M, + ? ? ? ? ? ? .length ? ? ? ? = SZ_4K, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .type ? ? ? ? ? = MT_DEVICE, ? ? ? }, { ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .virtual ? ? ? ?= (unsigned long)VA_VIC2,Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <[email protected]>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
PATCH 1/1 s5pc110: Reduce the iodesc length of systimer
Quoted 7 lines · Kyungmin Park
Hi Andrew,
Can you explain Mr. Kim request?
As your suggestion, If the sender and signed-off are different, add the From filed at body.
Yes I know, didn't see my posing?
In this case, my suggestion is just use same e-mail in a patch.
Quoted 2 lines
I think no need to add duplicated signed-off since it's same person.
Maybe you misunderstood my comments.
Quoted 19 lines
Thank you,
Kyungmin ParkQuoted 14 lines · Kukjin Kim
Quoted 6 lines · Kyungmin Park
From: Kyungmin Park <[email protected]>
It's enough to use 4KiB.
Signed-off-by Kyungmin Park <[email protected]>Where is submitter(kmpark at infradead.org)'s Signed-off-by? I know submitter and author in here are same...but e-mail. So added 'From' in your patch.
It would be helpful to me if you use same e-mail in a patch.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Also, the commit message needs to be more descriptive.
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c static struct map_desc s5pv210_iodesc[] __initdata =
Quoted 6 lines
---
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c +0
-0@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static struct map_desc s5pv210_iodesc[] __initdata =
{
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c static struct map_desc s5pv210_iodesc[] __initdata = · line 47
Quoted 9 lines
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c +1
-1? ? ? { ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .virtual ? ? ? ?= (unsigned long)S5P_VA_SYSTIMER, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .pfn ? ? ? ? ? ?= __phys_to_pfn(S5PV210_PA_SYSTIMER), - ? ? ? ? ? ? .length ? ? ? ? = SZ_1M, + ? ? ? ? ? ? .length ? ? ? ? = SZ_4K, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .type ? ? ? ? ? = MT_DEVICE, ? ? ? }, { ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .virtual ? ? ? ?= (unsigned long)VA_VIC2,
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <[email protected]>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
PATCH 1/1 s5pc110: Reduce the iodesc length of systimer
In reply to Kyungmin ParkQuoted 5 lines · On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 20:40:39 +0900 Kyungmin Park <[email protected]> wrote:
Can you explain Mr. Kim request?
As your suggestion, If the sender and signed-off are different, add the From filed at body.I think no need to add duplicated signed-off since it's same person.
If you're sending a patch which someone else wrote then at a minimum it should have that person's From: at the top of the changelog and it should have your Signed-off-by:.
However it is not required that the patch have the author's Signed-off-by:. See Documentation/SubmittingPatches, section 12. If you sent the patch and signed it then _you_ assert that it's OK to include the patch in Linux.
That being said, we do prefer that both the author and the sender include their signoffs.