lpfc: change spin_lock_irq() to spin_lock()
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 lpfc: change spin_lock_irq() to spin_lock()
In lpfc_cleanup_pending_mbox() we already have IRQs disabled so we don't need to disable them again.
Also in lpfc_sli_intr_handler() there is a typo where it has spin_unlock_irq() instead of just spin_unlock().
Signed-off-by Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c +5 -5
@@ -8460,7 +8460,7 @@ lpfc_sli_intr_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)* If there is deferred error attention, do not check for any interrupt. */ if (unlikely (phba->hba_flag &DEFER_ERATT )) { -spin_unlock_irq (&phba->hbalock); +spin_unlock (&phba->hbalock);return IRQ_NONE ; }
@@ -12813,9 +12813,9 @@ lpfc_cleanup_pending_mbox(struct lpfc_vport *vport) } ndlp = (struct lpfc_nodelist *) mb->context2;if (ndlp) { -spin_lock_irq (shost->host_lock); +spin_lock (shost->host_lock); ndlp->nlp_flag &= ~NLP_IGNR_REG_CMPL ; -spin_unlock_irq (shost->host_lock); +spin_unlock (shost->host_lock);lpfc_nlp_put (ndlp); mb->context2 =NULL ; }
@@ -12831,9 +12831,9 @@ lpfc_cleanup_pending_mbox(struct lpfc_vport *vport)if (mb->u.mb.mbxCommand =MBX_REG_LOGIN64 ) { ndlp = (struct lpfc_nodelist *) mb->context2;if (ndlp) { -spin_lock_irq (shost->host_lock); +spin_lock (shost->host_lock); ndlp->nlp_flag &= ~NLP_IGNR_REG_CMPL ; -spin_unlock_irq (shost->host_lock); +spin_unlock (shost->host_lock);lpfc_nlp_put (ndlp); mb->context2 =NULL ; }
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
Quoted 9 lines · Dan Carpenter
In
lpfc_cleanup_pending_mbox()we already have IRQs disabled so we don't need to disable them again.Also in
lpfc_sli_intr_handler()there is a typo where it hasspin_unlock_irq()instead of justspin_unlock().Signed-off-by Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c +0
-0
Acked-by James Smart <[email protected]>
Thank You.
-- james s