build error in current dev tree
Hi Alex,
Can you fix up the current dev tree? When I merge it into 2.6.36-rc8, I get the following error:
CC fs/xfs/support/debug.o
CC fs/xfs/support/uuid.ofs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c:671: error: redefinition of ‘__xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag’ fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c:623: note: previous definition of ‘__xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag’ was here
I beleive it's a merge error because you rebased the for-linus branch to change a commit message for a pull to Linus, and the linux-next tree is also seeing this problem. Now that commit is in mainline it is not merging cleanly with the dev branch. Can you either commit a fix or rebase the current tree on 2.6.36-rc8?
Cheers,
Dave.
Signature · 7 lines
Dave Chinner [email protected] _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list [email protected] http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
Quoted 10 lines · Dave Chinner
Hi Alex,
Can you fix up the current dev tree? When I merge it into 2.6.36-rc8, I get the following error:
CC
fs/xfs/support/debug.o
CCfs/xfs/support/uuid.ofs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c:671: error: redefinition of ‘__xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag’fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c:623: note: previous definition of ‘__xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag’ was here
Quoted 5 lines
I beleive it's a merge error because you rebased the for-linus branch to change a commit message for a pull to Linus, and the linux-next tree is also seeing this problem. Now that commit is in mainline it is not merging cleanly with the dev branch. Can you either commit a fix or rebase the current tree on 2.6.36-rc8?
I see what you're talking about.
As I recall, 5ae4ef83... (xfs: properly account for reclaimed inodes) didn't apply cleanly to Linus' master because of other recent changes to linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c (possibly the batched per-AG lookup commit e1a48dbec... caused the problem).
It's possible I did not finish out resolving the issue properly. In any case, I'll try to resolve it by re-basing the entire XFS dev tree to v2.6.26-rc8. Christoph had suggested doing that anyway.
Once I've done that people will have to forcibly update their tracking branches; I'll provide info once I've fixed the problem. Thanks a lot for pointing it out.
-Alex
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs