Skip to contentSkip to conversation

target: dubious one-bit signed bitfield

PATCH In review Dan Carpenter 3 participants 5 messages Jan 15, 2011 – Jan 17, 2011

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 target: dubious one-bit signed bitfield

The signed one-bit types can be 0 or -1 which can cause a problem if someone ever checks if (foo->lu_gp_assoc = 1). The current code is fine because everyone just checks zero vs non-zero. But Sparse complains about it so lets change it. The warnings look like this:

include/target/target_core_base.h:228:26: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield

include/target/target_core_base.h +7 -7
index 07fdfb6..764177b 100644
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ struct t10_alua_lu_gp {
 } ____cacheline_aligned;
 
 struct t10_alua_lu_gp_member {
-	int lu_gp_assoc:1;
+	bool lu_gp_assoc;
 	atomic_t lu_gp_mem_ref_cnt;
 	spinlock_t lu_gp_mem_lock;
 	struct t10_alua_lu_gp *lu_gp;
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ struct t10_alua_tg_pt_gp {
 } ____cacheline_aligned;
 
 struct t10_alua_tg_pt_gp_member {
-	int tg_pt_gp_assoc:1;
+	bool tg_pt_gp_assoc;
 	atomic_t tg_pt_gp_mem_ref_cnt;
 	spinlock_t tg_pt_gp_mem_lock;
 	struct t10_alua_tg_pt_gp *tg_pt_gp;
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ struct t10_pr_registration {
 	int pr_res_type;
 	int pr_res_scope;
 	/* Used for fabric initiator WWPNs using a ISID */
-	int isid_present_at_reg:1;
+	bool isid_present_at_reg;
 	u32 pr_res_mapped_lun;
 	u32 pr_aptpl_target_lun;
 	u32 pr_res_generation;
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ struct se_transport_task {
 	unsigned long long	t_task_lba;
 	int			t_tasks_failed;
 	int			t_tasks_fua;
-	int			t_tasks_bidi:1;
+	bool			t_tasks_bidi;
 	u32			t_task_cdbs;
 	u32			t_tasks_check;
 	u32			t_tasks_no;
@@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ struct se_task {
 	u8		task_flags;
 	int		task_error_status;
 	int		task_state_flags;
-	int		task_padded_sg:1;
+	bool		task_padded_sg;
 	unsigned long long	task_lba;
 	u32		task_no;
 	u32		task_sectors;
@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ struct se_ua {
 struct se_node_acl {
 	char			initiatorname[TRANSPORT_IQN_LEN];
 	/* Used to signal demo mode created ACL, disabled by default */
-	int			dynamic_node_acl:1;
+	bool			dynamic_node_acl;
 	u32			queue_depth;
 	u32			acl_index;
 	u64			num_cmds;
@@ -622,7 +622,7 @@ struct se_lun_acl {
 }  ____cacheline_aligned;
 
 struct se_dev_entry {
-	int			def_pr_registered:1;
+	bool			def_pr_registered;
 	/* See transport_lunflags_table */
 	u32			lun_flags;
 	u32			deve_cmds;
include/target/target_core_fabric_ops.h +1 -1
index f3ac12b..5eb8b1a 100644
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ struct target_core_fabric_ops {
 	 * for scatterlist chaining using transport_do_task_sg_link(),
 	 * disabled by default
 	 */
-	int task_sg_chaining:1;
+	bool task_sg_chaining;
 	char *(*get_fabric_name)(void);
 	u8 (*get_fabric_proto_ident)(struct se_portal_group *);
 	char *(*tpg_get_wwn)(struct se_portal_group *);
#1 lore raw

Am 15.01.2011 15:04, schrieb Dan Carpenter:

Quoted 5 lines

The signed one-bit types can be 0 or -1 which can cause a problem if someone ever checks if (foo->lu_gp_assoc = 1). The current code is fine because everyone just checks zero vs non-zero. But Sparse complains about it so lets change it. The warnings look like this:

Your code looks ok,
but to avoid that kind of errors it may be better to use int here.

re,
wh

Quoted 90 lines

include/target/target_core_base.h:228:26: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield

include/target/target_core_base.h +7 -7
index 07fdfb6..764177b 100644
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ struct t10_alua_lu_gp {
 } ____cacheline_aligned;
 
 struct t10_alua_lu_gp_member {
-	int lu_gp_assoc:1;
+	bool lu_gp_assoc;
 	atomic_t lu_gp_mem_ref_cnt;
 	spinlock_t lu_gp_mem_lock;
 	struct t10_alua_lu_gp *lu_gp;
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ struct t10_alua_tg_pt_gp {
 } ____cacheline_aligned;
 
 struct t10_alua_tg_pt_gp_member {
-	int tg_pt_gp_assoc:1;
+	bool tg_pt_gp_assoc;
 	atomic_t tg_pt_gp_mem_ref_cnt;
 	spinlock_t tg_pt_gp_mem_lock;
 	struct t10_alua_tg_pt_gp *tg_pt_gp;
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ struct t10_pr_registration {
 	int pr_res_type;
 	int pr_res_scope;
 	/* Used for fabric initiator WWPNs using a ISID */
-	int isid_present_at_reg:1;
+	bool isid_present_at_reg;
 	u32 pr_res_mapped_lun;
 	u32 pr_aptpl_target_lun;
 	u32 pr_res_generation;
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ struct se_transport_task {
 	unsigned long long	t_task_lba;
 	int			t_tasks_failed;
 	int			t_tasks_fua;
-	int			t_tasks_bidi:1;
+	bool			t_tasks_bidi;
 	u32			t_task_cdbs;
 	u32			t_tasks_check;
 	u32			t_tasks_no;
@@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ struct se_task {
 	u8		task_flags;
 	int		task_error_status;
 	int		task_state_flags;
-	int		task_padded_sg:1;
+	bool		task_padded_sg;
 	unsigned long long	task_lba;
 	u32		task_no;
 	u32		task_sectors;
@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ struct se_ua {
 struct se_node_acl {
 	char			initiatorname[TRANSPORT_IQN_LEN];
 	/* Used to signal demo mode created ACL, disabled by default */
-	int			dynamic_node_acl:1;
+	bool			dynamic_node_acl;
 	u32			queue_depth;
 	u32			acl_index;
 	u64			num_cmds;
@@ -622,7 +622,7 @@ struct se_lun_acl {
 }  ____cacheline_aligned;
 
 struct se_dev_entry {
-	int			def_pr_registered:1;
+	bool			def_pr_registered;
 	/* See transport_lunflags_table */
 	u32			lun_flags;
 	u32			deve_cmds;
include/target/target_core_fabric_ops.h +1 -2
index f3ac12b..5eb8b1a 100644
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ struct target_core_fabric_ops {
 	 * for scatterlist chaining using transport_do_task_sg_link(),
 	 * disabled by default
 	 */
-	int task_sg_chaining:1;
+	bool task_sg_chaining;
 	char *(*get_fabric_name)(void);
 	u8 (*get_fabric_proto_ident)(struct se_portal_group *);
 	char *(*tpg_get_wwn)(struct se_portal_group *);
--

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

#2 lore raw
Quoted 12 lines · walter harms

Am 15.01.2011 15:04, schrieb Dan Carpenter:

Quoted 5 lines

The signed one-bit types can be 0 or -1 which can cause a problem if someone ever checks if (foo->lu_gp_assoc = 1). The current code is fine because everyone just checks zero vs non-zero. But Sparse complains about it so lets change it. The warnings look like this:

Your code looks ok,
but to avoid that kind of errors it may be better to use int here.

I'm afraid I don't understand what you are saying.

regards,
dan carpenter

#3 lore raw

Am 15.01.2011 17:54, schrieb Dan Carpenter:

Quoted 10 lines · walter harms
Quoted 9 lines

Am 15.01.2011 15:04, schrieb Dan Carpenter:

Quoted 5 lines

The signed one-bit types can be 0 or -1 which can cause a problem if someone ever checks if (foo->lu_gp_assoc = 1). The current code is fine because everyone just checks zero vs non-zero. But Sparse complains about it so lets change it. The warnings look like this:

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Your code looks ok,
but to avoid that kind of errors it may be better to use int here.

I'm afraid I don't understand what you are saying.

IMHO, it is better to just drop the bitfield. Most people expect int as return.

re,
wh

#4 lore raw
In reply to Dan Carpenter
Quoted 8 lines · Dan Carpenter

The signed one-bit types can be 0 or -1 which can cause a problem if someone ever checks if (foo->lu_gp_assoc = 1). The current code is fine because everyone just checks zero vs non-zero. But Sparse complains about it so lets change it. The warnings look like this:

include/target/target_core_base.h:228:26: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield

Looks reasonable to me.. Committed as daf0bd7aa57e in lio-core-2.6.git/linus-38-rc1 and cherry picked into scsi-post-merge-2.6.git/for-jejb.

Thanks Dan!

--nab

Quoted 81 lines
include/target/target_core_base.h +7 -7
index 07fdfb6..764177b 100644
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ struct t10_alua_lu_gp {
 } ____cacheline_aligned;
 
 struct t10_alua_lu_gp_member {
-	int lu_gp_assoc:1;
+	bool lu_gp_assoc;
 	atomic_t lu_gp_mem_ref_cnt;
 	spinlock_t lu_gp_mem_lock;
 	struct t10_alua_lu_gp *lu_gp;
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ struct t10_alua_tg_pt_gp {
 } ____cacheline_aligned;
 
 struct t10_alua_tg_pt_gp_member {
-	int tg_pt_gp_assoc:1;
+	bool tg_pt_gp_assoc;
 	atomic_t tg_pt_gp_mem_ref_cnt;
 	spinlock_t tg_pt_gp_mem_lock;
 	struct t10_alua_tg_pt_gp *tg_pt_gp;
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ struct t10_pr_registration {
 	int pr_res_type;
 	int pr_res_scope;
 	/* Used for fabric initiator WWPNs using a ISID */
-	int isid_present_at_reg:1;
+	bool isid_present_at_reg;
 	u32 pr_res_mapped_lun;
 	u32 pr_aptpl_target_lun;
 	u32 pr_res_generation;
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ struct se_transport_task {
 	unsigned long long	t_task_lba;
 	int			t_tasks_failed;
 	int			t_tasks_fua;
-	int			t_tasks_bidi:1;
+	bool			t_tasks_bidi;
 	u32			t_task_cdbs;
 	u32			t_tasks_check;
 	u32			t_tasks_no;
@@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ struct se_task {
 	u8		task_flags;
 	int		task_error_status;
 	int		task_state_flags;
-	int		task_padded_sg:1;
+	bool		task_padded_sg;
 	unsigned long long	task_lba;
 	u32		task_no;
 	u32		task_sectors;
@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ struct se_ua {
 struct se_node_acl {
 	char			initiatorname[TRANSPORT_IQN_LEN];
 	/* Used to signal demo mode created ACL, disabled by default */
-	int			dynamic_node_acl:1;
+	bool			dynamic_node_acl;
 	u32			queue_depth;
 	u32			acl_index;
 	u64			num_cmds;
@@ -622,7 +622,7 @@ struct se_lun_acl {
 }  ____cacheline_aligned;
 
 struct se_dev_entry {
-	int			def_pr_registered:1;
+	bool			def_pr_registered;
 	/* See transport_lunflags_table */
 	u32			lun_flags;
 	u32			deve_cmds;
include/target/target_core_fabric_ops.h +1 -1
index f3ac12b..5eb8b1a 100644
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ struct target_core_fabric_ops {
 	 * for scatterlist chaining using transport_do_task_sg_link(),
 	 * disabled by default
 	 */
-	int task_sg_chaining:1;
+	bool task_sg_chaining;
 	char *(*get_fabric_name)(void);
 	u8 (*get_fabric_proto_ident)(struct se_portal_group *);
 	char *(*tpg_get_wwn)(struct se_portal_group *);