ath3k: Avoid duplication of code
PATCH 1/2 ath3k: Avoid duplication of code
Hi.
In commit 86e09287e4f8c81831b4d4118a48597565f0d21b, to reduce memory usage, the functions of the ath3k module were rewritten to release the firmware blob after it has been loaded (successfully or not).
The resuting code has some redundancy and the compiler can potentially produce better code if we omit a function call that is unconditionally executed in
,----
| if (ath3k_load_firmware(udev, firmware)) {
| release_firmware(firmware);
| return -EIO;
| }
| release_firmware(firmware);
|
| return 0;
| }`----
It may also be argued that the rewritten code becomes easier to read, and also to see the code coverage of the snippet in question.
---
I am sending here two proposals for rewriting the code. This is the first one. The second uses the ternary operator and seems to have more usage in the kernel (or, at least, under mm).
---
drivers/bluetooth/ath3k.c +5 -5
@@ -116,13 +116,13 @@ static int ath3k_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,return -EIO ; } -if (ath3k_load_firmware (udev, firmware)) { -release_firmware (firmware); -return -EIO ; - } + ret =ath3k_load_firmware (udev, firmware);release_firmware (firmware); -return 0 ; +if (ret) +return -EIO ; +else +return 0 ; }static void ath3k_disconnect (struct usb_interface *intf)
Hi,
2011/1/28 Rogério Brito <[email protected]>:
Quoted 45 lines
Hi.
In commit
86e09287e4f8c81831b4d4118a48597565f0d21b, to reduce memory usage, the functions of the ath3k module were rewritten to release the firmware blob after it has been loaded (successfully or not).The resuting code has some redundancy and the compiler can potentially produce better code if we omit a function call that is unconditionally executed in
,----
| if (ath3k_load_firmware(udev, firmware)) { | release_firmware(firmware); | return -EIO; | } | release_firmware(firmware); | | return 0; | }`----
It may also be argued that the rewritten code becomes easier to read, and also to see the code coverage of the snippet in question.
Signed-off-by Rogério Brito <[email protected]>---
I am sending here two proposals for rewriting the code. This is the first one. The second uses the ternary operator and seems to have more usage in the kernel (or, at least, under mm).
---
drivers/bluetooth/ath3k.c +0
-2@@ -116,13 +116,13 @@ static int ath3k_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, return -EIO; } - if (ath3k_load_firmware(udev, firmware)) { - release_firmware(firmware);
drivers/bluetooth/ath3k.c static int ath3k_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, · line 125
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/bluetooth/ath3k.c +5
-3- return -EIO; - } + ret = ath3k_load_firmware(udev, firmware); release_firmware(firmware); - return 0; + if (ret) + return -EIO; + else + return 0;
We don't need "else" after a return statement, in order to avoid a indentation level.
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/bluetooth/ath3k.c +0
-1} static void ath3k_disconnect(struct usb_interface *intf) --To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/