Building btrfs as a dkms module on Debian
Hi everyone. I was trying to test a more recent version of btrfs on my = current kernel (2.6.37) using dkms, without success.
I followed these instructions:
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Btrfs_source_repositories
- cloned the repo
- symlinked to /usr/src/btrfs-git
- patched version.sh:
Please note version.sh requires bash (better to change the shebang or f= ix the script).
Even with the patch, version.sh run on a shallow repository generates a=
"-dirty" version. I assume this is OK, even though there are no local =
changes.
- run version.sh
- dkms add -m btrfs -v git
- dkms build -m btrfs -v git fails with:
/var/lib/dkms/btrfs/git/build/extent-tree.c: In function =E2=80=98btrfs= _issue_discard=E2=80=99:/var/lib/dkms/btrfs/git/build/extent-tree.c:1747: error: =E2=80=98BLKDE= V_IFL_WAIT=E2=80=99 undeclared (first use in this function) /var/lib/dkms/btrfs/git/build/extent-tree.c:1747: error: (Each undeclar= ed identifier is reported only once /var/lib/dkms/btrfs/git/build/extent-tree.c:1747: error: for each funct= ion it appears in.) /var/lib/dkms/btrfs/git/build/extent-tree.c:1747: error: =E2=80=98BLKDE= V_IFL_BARRIER=E2=80=99 undeclared (first use in this function)
I assume BLKDEV_IFL_WAIT/BARRIER was added in later kernels? Is there a way to make it build btrfs for 2.6.37?
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" = in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 1 line · Yuri D'Elia
Hi everyone. I was trying to test a more recent version of btrfs on m=
y current kernel (2.6.37) using dkms, without success.
Quoted 10 lines
=20
I followed these instructions:
=20
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Btrfs_source_repositories
=20
- cloned the repo
- symlinked to/usr/src/btrfs-git
- patchedversion.sh:
=20
Please noteversion.shrequires bash (better to change the shebang or=
fix the script).
Quoted 1 line
Even with the patch,
version.shrun on a shallow repository generates=
a "-dirty" version. I assume this is OK, even though there are no loca=
l changes.
Quoted 6 lines
=20
- runversion.sh
- dkms add -m btrfs -v git
- dkms build -m btrfs -v git fails with:
=20/var/lib/dkms/btrfs/git/build/extent-tree.c: In function =E2=80=98btr=
fs_issue_discard=E2=80=99:
Quoted 1 line
/var/lib/dkms/btrfs/git/build/extent-tree.c:1747: error: =E2=80=98BLK=
DEV_IFL_WAIT=E2=80=99 undeclared (first use in this function)
Quoted 1 line
/var/lib/dkms/btrfs/git/build/extent-tree.c:1747: error: (Each undecl=
ared identifier is reported only once
Quoted 1 line
/var/lib/dkms/btrfs/git/build/extent-tree.c:1747: error: for each fun=
ction it appears in.)
Quoted 1 line
/var/lib/dkms/btrfs/git/build/extent-tree.c:1747: error: =E2=80=98BLK=
DEV_IFL_BARRIER=E2=80=99 undeclared (first use in this function)
Quoted 3 lines
=20
I assume BLKDEV_IFL_WAIT/BARRIER was added in later kernels? Is there a way to make it build btrfs for 2.6.37?
in commit fbd9b09a177a481eda256447c881f014f29034fe:include/linux/blkdev.h:
#define BLKDEV_IFL_WAIT (1 << BLKDEV_WAIT) #define BLKDEV_IFL_BARRIER (1 << BLKDEV_BARRIER) #define BLKDEV_IFL_SECURE (1 << BLKDEV_SECURE)
Maybe this is helpful.:)
thanks,
liubo
Quoted 5 lines
=20
Thanks
=20
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs=
" in
Quoted 3 lines
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
=20
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" = in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 11 lines · On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:51:43 +0800 liubo <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 2 lines
I assume BLKDEV_IFL_WAIT/BARRIER was added in later kernels? Is there a way to make it build btrfs for 2.6.37?
in commit
fbd9b09a177a481eda256447c881f014f29034fe:include/linux/blkdev.h:#define BLKDEV_IFL_WAIT (1 << BLKDEV_WAIT) #define BLKDEV_IFL_BARRIER (1 << BLKDEV_BARRIER) #define BLKDEV_IFL_SECURE (1 << BLKDEV_SECURE)Maybe this is helpful.:)
I've worked more on this today. There was a lot of restructuring of blkdev in 2.6.38, but in stock 2.6.37 only BLKDEV_SECURE has any effect.
Just in case, I'm posting here the changes required to backport current btrfs to 2.6.37 (just a few minor changes).
commit db77ab6c70a5c148ff4ab6d354603609c0eb73aa
Author: Yuri D'Elia <[email protected]> Date: Wed Feb 16 18:27:54 2011 +0100
Backport changes for compilation under 2.6.37
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +2 -2
@@ -2131,7 +2131,7 @@ static void btrfs_end_buffer_write_sync(struct buffer_head *bh, int uptodate)if (uptodate) {set_buffer_uptodate (bh); }else { -if (!buffer_eopnotsupp (bh) &&printk_ratelimit ()) { +if (printk_ratelimit ()) {printk (KERN_WARNING "lost page write due to " "I/O error on %s\n" ,bdevname (bh->b_bdev, b));
@@ -2269,7 +2269,7 @@ static int write_dev_supers(struct btrfs_device *device, }if (i == last_barrier && do_barriers && device->barriers) { - ret =submit_bh (WRITE_BARRIER , bh); + ret =submit_bh (WRITE_FLUSH_FUA , bh);if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP ) {printk ("btrfs: disabling barriers on dev %s\n" , device->name);
fs/btrfs/dkms.conf new file +6 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +PACKAGE_NAME="btrfs" +PACKAGE_VERSION="20110214" +BUILT_MODULE_NAME[0]="btrfs" +DEST_MODULE_LOCATION[0]="/kernel/fs/btrfs/" +AUTOINSTALL="yes" +REMAKE_INITRD="yes"
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +1 -2
@@ -1743,8 +1743,7 @@ static int remove_extent_backref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,static void btrfs_issue_discard (struct block_device *bdev,u64 start,u64 len) { -blkdev_issue_discard (bdev, start >>9 , len >>9 ,GFP_KERNEL , -BLKDEV_IFL_WAIT |BLKDEV_IFL_BARRIER ); +blkdev_issue_discard (bdev, start >>9 , len >>9 ,GFP_KERNEL ,0 ); } static int btrfs_discard_extent(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 bytenr,
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +4 -0
@@ -16,6 +16,10 @@#include "ctree.h" #include "btrfs_inode.h" +#define INIT_RCU_HEAD (ptr) do { \ + (ptr)->next = NULL; (ptr)->func = NULL; \ +} while (0) +static struct kmem_cache *extent_state_cache;static struct kmem_cache *extent_buffer_cache;
fs/btrfs/version.h +3 -3
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -#ifndef __BTRFS_VERSION_H -#define __BTRFS_VERSION_H -#define BTRFS_BUILD_VERSION "Btrfs" +#ifndef __BUILD_VERSION +#define __BUILD_VERSION +#define BTRFS_BUILD_VERSION "Btrfs 2011-02-14_16:21:37_-0500_c26a920-dirty"#endif
fs/btrfs/version.sh +1 -5
@@ -12,10 +12,7 @@ which git &> /dev/null if [ $? == 0 ]; then git branch >& /dev/null if [ $? == 0 ]; then - if head=`git rev-parse --verify HEAD 2>/dev/null`; then - if tag=`git describe --tags 2>/dev/null`; then - v="$tag" - fi + v="`git show --format='%ci_%h'|head -n 1|sed -e 's/[^a-z0-9_:-]/_/ig'`" # Are there uncommitted changes? git update-index --refresh --unmerged > /dev/null
@@ -24,7 +21,6 @@ if [ $? == 0 ]; then | read dummy; then v="$v"-dirty fi - fi fi fi