tracing/kprobes: Fix kprobe-tracer to support stack trace
PATCH 1/1 tracing/kprobes: Fix kprobe-tracer to support stack trace
Fix to support kernel stack trace correctly on kprobe-tracer. Since the execution path of kprobe-based dynamic events is different from other tracepoint-based events, normal ftrace_trace_stack() doesn't work correctly. To fix that, this introduces ftrace_trace_stack_regs() which traces stack via pt_regs instead of current stack register.
e.g.
# echo p schedule > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
# echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/options/stacktrace
# echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/enable
# head -n 20 /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace
# tracer: nop
#
# TASK-PID CPU# TIMESTAMP FUNCTION
# | | | | |
sshd-1549 [001] 857.326335: p_schedule_0: (schedule+0x0/0x900)
sshd-1549 [001] 857.326337: <stack trace>
=> schedule_hrtimeout_range
=> poll_schedule_timeout
=> do_select
=> core_sys_select
=> sys_select
=> system_call_fastpath
tee-1751 [000] 857.326394: p_schedule_0: (schedule+0x0/0x900)
tee-1751 [000] 857.326395: <stack trace>
=> do_group_exit
=> sys_exit_group
=> system_call_fastpath
<idle>-0 [001] 857.326406: p_schedule_0: (schedule+0x0/0x900)
<idle>-0 [001] 857.326407: <stack trace>
=> start_secondary--- include/linux/ftrace_event.h | 4 ++++ kernel/trace/trace.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- kernel/trace/trace.h | 9 +++++++++ kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 6 ++++-- 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
include/linux/ftrace_event.h +4 -0
@@ -117,6 +117,10 @@ void trace_current_buffer_unlock_commit(struct ring_buffer *buffer,void trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit (struct ring_buffer *buffer,struct ring_buffer_event *event,unsigned long flags,int pc); +void trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer, +struct ring_buffer_event *event, +unsigned long flags,int pc, +struct pt_regs *regs);void trace_current_buffer_discard_commit (struct ring_buffer *buffer,struct ring_buffer_event *event);
kernel/trace/trace.c +30 -5
@@ -1191,6 +1191,18 @@ void trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit(struct ring_buffer *buffer, }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit); +void trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer, +struct ring_buffer_event *event, +unsigned long flags,int pc, +struct pt_regs *regs) +{ +ring_buffer_unlock_commit (buffer, event); + +ftrace_trace_stack_regs (buffer, flags,0 , pc, regs); +ftrace_trace_userstack (buffer, flags, pc); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs); +void trace_current_buffer_discard_commit (struct ring_buffer *buffer,struct ring_buffer_event *event) {
@@ -1236,7 +1248,7 @@ ftrace(struct trace_array *tr, struct trace_array_cpu *data,#ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE static void __ftrace_trace_stack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags, -int skip,int pc) +int skip,int pc,struct pt_regs *regs) {struct ftrace_event_call *call = &event_kernel_stack;struct ring_buffer_event *event;
@@ -1255,24 +1267,36 @@ static void __ftrace_trace_stack(struct ring_buffer *buffer, trace.skip = skip; trace.entries = entry->caller; -save_stack_trace (&trace); +if (regs) +save_stack_trace_regs (&trace, regs); +else +save_stack_trace (&trace);if (!filter_check_discard (call, entry, buffer, event))ring_buffer_unlock_commit (buffer, event); } +void ftrace_trace_stack_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags, +int skip,int pc,struct pt_regs *regs) +{ +if (!(trace_flags &TRACE_ITER_STACKTRACE )) +return ; + +__ftrace_trace_stack (buffer, flags, skip, pc, regs); +} +void ftrace_trace_stack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags,int skip,int pc) {if (!(trace_flags &TRACE_ITER_STACKTRACE ))return ; -__ftrace_trace_stack (buffer, flags, skip, pc); +__ftrace_trace_stack (buffer, flags, skip, pc,NULL ); }void __trace_stack (struct trace_array *tr,unsigned long flags,int skip,int pc) { -__ftrace_trace_stack (tr->buffer, flags, skip, pc); +__ftrace_trace_stack (tr->buffer, flags, skip, pc,NULL ); }/**
@@ -1288,7 +1312,8 @@ void trace_dump_stack(void)local_save_flags (flags);/* skipping 3 traces, seems to get us at the caller of this function */ -__ftrace_trace_stack (global_trace.buffer, flags,3 ,preempt_count ()); +__ftrace_trace_stack (global_trace.buffer, flags,3 ,preempt_count (), +NULL ); } static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, user_stack_count);
kernel/trace/trace.h +9 -0
@@ -389,6 +389,9 @@ void update_max_tr_single(struct trace_array *tr,void ftrace_trace_stack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags,int skip,int pc); +void ftrace_trace_stack_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags, +int skip,int pc,struct pt_regs *regs); +void ftrace_trace_userstack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags,int pc);
@@ -400,6 +403,12 @@ static inline void ftrace_trace_stack(struct ring_buffer *buffer, { } +static inline void ftrace_trace_stack_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer, +unsigned long flags,int skip, +int pc,struct pt_regs *regs) +{ +} +static inline void ftrace_trace_userstack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags,int pc) {
kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c +4 -2
@@ -1397,7 +1397,8 @@ static __kprobes void kprobe_trace_func(struct kprobe *kp, struct pt_regs *regs)store_trace_args (sizeof (*entry), tp, regs, (u8 *)&entry[1 ], dsize);if (!filter_current_check_discard (buffer, call, entry, event)) -trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit (buffer, event, irq_flags, pc); +trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs (buffer, event, + irq_flags, pc, regs); }/* Kretprobe handler */
@@ -1429,7 +1430,8 @@ static __kprobes void kretprobe_trace_func(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,store_trace_args (sizeof (*entry), tp, regs, (u8 *)&entry[1 ], dsize);if (!filter_current_check_discard (buffer, call, entry, event)) -trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit (buffer, event, irq_flags, pc); +trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs (buffer, event, + irq_flags, pc, regs); }/* Event entry printers */
Quoted 5 lines · Masami Hiramatsu
Fix to support kernel stack trace correctly on kprobe-tracer. Since the execution path of kprobe-based dynamic events is different from other tracepoint-based events, normal
ftrace_trace_stack()doesn't work correctly. To fix that, this introducesftrace_trace_stack_regs()which traces stack viapt_regsinstead of current stack register.
Hmm, any comments?
Quoted 191 lines
e.g.
# echo p schedule > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/options/stacktrace # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/enable # head -n 20 /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace # tracer: nop # # TASK-PID CPU# TIMESTAMP FUNCTION # | | | | | sshd-1549 [001] 857.326335: p_schedule_0: (schedule+0x0/0x900) sshd-1549 [001] 857.326337: <stack trace> => schedule_hrtimeout_range => poll_schedule_timeout => do_select => core_sys_select => sys_select => system_call_fastpath tee-1751 [000] 857.326394: p_schedule_0: (schedule+0x0/0x900) tee-1751 [000] 857.326395: <stack trace> => do_group_exit => sys_exit_group => system_call_fastpath <idle>-0 [001] 857.326406: p_schedule_0: (schedule+0x0/0x900) <idle>-0 [001] 857.326407: <stack trace> => start_secondarySigned-off-by Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>Cc Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>Cc Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>Cc Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>Cc Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>Cc Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>--- include/linux/ftrace_event.h | 4 ++++ kernel/trace/trace.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- kernel/trace/trace.h | 9 +++++++++ kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 6 ++++-- 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)include/linux/ftrace_event.h +4
-0@@ -117,6 +117,10 @@ void trace_current_buffer_unlock_commit(struct ring_buffer *buffer,void trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit (struct ring_buffer *buffer,struct ring_buffer_event *event,unsigned long flags,int pc); +void trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer, +struct ring_buffer_event *event, +unsigned long flags,int pc, +struct pt_regs *regs);void trace_current_buffer_discard_commit (struct ring_buffer *buffer,struct ring_buffer_event *event);kernel/trace/trace.c +30
-5@@ -1191,6 +1191,18 @@ void trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit(struct ring_buffer *buffer, }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit); +void trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer, +struct ring_buffer_event *event, +unsigned long flags,int pc, +struct pt_regs *regs) +{ +ring_buffer_unlock_commit (buffer, event); + +ftrace_trace_stack_regs (buffer, flags,0 , pc, regs); +ftrace_trace_userstack (buffer, flags, pc); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs); +void trace_current_buffer_discard_commit (struct ring_buffer *buffer,struct ring_buffer_event *event) {@@ -1236,7 +1248,7 @@ ftrace(struct trace_array *tr, struct trace_array_cpu *data,#ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE static void __ftrace_trace_stack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags, -int skip,int pc) +int skip,int pc,struct pt_regs *regs) {struct ftrace_event_call *call = &event_kernel_stack;struct ring_buffer_event *event;@@ -1255,24 +1267,36 @@ static void __ftrace_trace_stack(struct ring_buffer *buffer, trace.skip = skip; trace.entries = entry->caller; -save_stack_trace (&trace); +if (regs) +save_stack_trace_regs (&trace, regs); +else +save_stack_trace (&trace);if (!filter_check_discard (call, entry, buffer, event))ring_buffer_unlock_commit (buffer, event); } +void ftrace_trace_stack_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags, +int skip,int pc,struct pt_regs *regs) +{ +if (!(trace_flags &TRACE_ITER_STACKTRACE )) +return ; + +__ftrace_trace_stack (buffer, flags, skip, pc, regs); +} +void ftrace_trace_stack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags,int skip,int pc) {if (!(trace_flags &TRACE_ITER_STACKTRACE ))return ; -__ftrace_trace_stack (buffer, flags, skip, pc); +__ftrace_trace_stack (buffer, flags, skip, pc,NULL ); }void __trace_stack (struct trace_array *tr,unsigned long flags,int skip,int pc) { -__ftrace_trace_stack (tr->buffer, flags, skip, pc); +__ftrace_trace_stack (tr->buffer, flags, skip, pc,NULL ); }/** @@ -1288,7 +1312,8 @@ void trace_dump_stack(void)local_save_flags (flags);/* skipping 3 traces, seems to get us at the caller of this function */ -__ftrace_trace_stack (global_trace.buffer, flags,3 ,preempt_count ()); +__ftrace_trace_stack (global_trace.buffer, flags,3 ,preempt_count (), +NULL ); } static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, user_stack_count);kernel/trace/trace.h +9
-0@@ -389,6 +389,9 @@ void update_max_tr_single(struct trace_array *tr,void ftrace_trace_stack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags,int skip,int pc); +void ftrace_trace_stack_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags, +int skip,int pc,struct pt_regs *regs); +void ftrace_trace_userstack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags,int pc);@@ -400,6 +403,12 @@ static inline void ftrace_trace_stack(struct ring_buffer *buffer, { } +static inline void ftrace_trace_stack_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer, +unsigned long flags,int skip, +int pc,struct pt_regs *regs) +{ +} +static inline void ftrace_trace_userstack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags,int pc) {kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c +4
-2@@ -1397,7 +1397,8 @@ static __kprobes void kprobe_trace_func(struct kprobe *kp, struct pt_regs *regs)store_trace_args (sizeof (*entry), tp, regs, (u8 *)&entry[1 ], dsize);if (!filter_current_check_discard (buffer, call, entry, event)) -trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit (buffer, event, irq_flags, pc); +trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs (buffer, event, + irq_flags, pc, regs); }/* Kretprobe handler */ @@ -1429,7 +1430,8 @@ static __kprobes void kretprobe_trace_func(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,store_trace_args (sizeof (*entry), tp, regs, (u8 *)&entry[1 ], dsize);if (!filter_current_check_discard (buffer, call, entry, event)) -trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit (buffer, event, irq_flags, pc); +trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs (buffer, event, + irq_flags, pc, regs); }/* Event entry printers */
Signature · 4 lines
Masami HIRAMATSU Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Center Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory E-mail: [email protected]
Quoted 8 lines · * Masami Hiramatsu ([email protected]) wrote:
Quoted 5 lines · Masami Hiramatsu
Fix to support kernel stack trace correctly on kprobe-tracer. Since the execution path of kprobe-based dynamic events is different from other tracepoint-based events, normal
ftrace_trace_stack()doesn't work correctly. To fix that, this introducesftrace_trace_stack_regs()which traces stack viapt_regsinstead of current stack register.Hmm, any comments?
What you are adding makes sense. I'm not saying that I agree on the general approach taken by the existing code to save the stack trace in a record that is separate from the actual event that the tracer claims it belongs to: it leads to situations where an interrupt handler can come in and you get two events followed by two stack traces (in reversed order), but this code was already there to start with, so you are just making it work with kprobes, which is a sensible thing to do.
Thanks!
Quoted 199 lines
Quoted 192 lines
e.g.
# echo p schedule > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/options/stacktrace # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/enable # head -n 20 /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace # tracer: nop # # TASK-PID CPU# TIMESTAMP FUNCTION # | | | | | sshd-1549 [001] 857.326335: p_schedule_0: (schedule+0x0/0x900) sshd-1549 [001] 857.326337: <stack trace> => schedule_hrtimeout_range => poll_schedule_timeout => do_select => core_sys_select => sys_select => system_call_fastpath tee-1751 [000] 857.326394: p_schedule_0: (schedule+0x0/0x900) tee-1751 [000] 857.326395: <stack trace> => do_group_exit => sys_exit_group => system_call_fastpath <idle>-0 [001] 857.326406: p_schedule_0: (schedule+0x0/0x900) <idle>-0 [001] 857.326407: <stack trace> => start_secondarySigned-off-by Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>Cc Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>Cc Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>Cc Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>Cc Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>Cc Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>--- include/linux/ftrace_event.h | 4 ++++ kernel/trace/trace.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- kernel/trace/trace.h | 9 +++++++++ kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 6 ++++-- 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)include/linux/ftrace_event.h +4
-0@@ -117,6 +117,10 @@ void trace_current_buffer_unlock_commit(struct ring_buffer *buffer,void trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit (struct ring_buffer *buffer,struct ring_buffer_event *event,unsigned long flags,int pc); +void trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer, +struct ring_buffer_event *event, +unsigned long flags,int pc, +struct pt_regs *regs);void trace_current_buffer_discard_commit (struct ring_buffer *buffer,struct ring_buffer_event *event);kernel/trace/trace.c +30
-5@@ -1191,6 +1191,18 @@ void trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit(struct ring_buffer *buffer, }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit); +void trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer, +struct ring_buffer_event *event, +unsigned long flags,int pc, +struct pt_regs *regs) +{ +ring_buffer_unlock_commit (buffer, event); + +ftrace_trace_stack_regs (buffer, flags,0 , pc, regs); +ftrace_trace_userstack (buffer, flags, pc); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs); +void trace_current_buffer_discard_commit (struct ring_buffer *buffer,struct ring_buffer_event *event) {@@ -1236,7 +1248,7 @@ ftrace(struct trace_array *tr, struct trace_array_cpu *data,#ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE static void __ftrace_trace_stack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags, -int skip,int pc) +int skip,int pc,struct pt_regs *regs) {struct ftrace_event_call *call = &event_kernel_stack;struct ring_buffer_event *event;@@ -1255,24 +1267,36 @@ static void __ftrace_trace_stack(struct ring_buffer *buffer, trace.skip = skip; trace.entries = entry->caller; -save_stack_trace (&trace); +if (regs) +save_stack_trace_regs (&trace, regs); +else +save_stack_trace (&trace);if (!filter_check_discard (call, entry, buffer, event))ring_buffer_unlock_commit (buffer, event); } +void ftrace_trace_stack_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags, +int skip,int pc,struct pt_regs *regs) +{ +if (!(trace_flags &TRACE_ITER_STACKTRACE )) +return ; + +__ftrace_trace_stack (buffer, flags, skip, pc, regs); +} +void ftrace_trace_stack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags,int skip,int pc) {if (!(trace_flags &TRACE_ITER_STACKTRACE ))return ; -__ftrace_trace_stack (buffer, flags, skip, pc); +__ftrace_trace_stack (buffer, flags, skip, pc,NULL ); }void __trace_stack (struct trace_array *tr,unsigned long flags,int skip,int pc) { -__ftrace_trace_stack (tr->buffer, flags, skip, pc); +__ftrace_trace_stack (tr->buffer, flags, skip, pc,NULL ); }/** @@ -1288,7 +1312,8 @@ void trace_dump_stack(void)local_save_flags (flags);/* skipping 3 traces, seems to get us at the caller of this function */ -__ftrace_trace_stack (global_trace.buffer, flags,3 ,preempt_count ()); +__ftrace_trace_stack (global_trace.buffer, flags,3 ,preempt_count (), +NULL ); } static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, user_stack_count);kernel/trace/trace.h +9
-0@@ -389,6 +389,9 @@ void update_max_tr_single(struct trace_array *tr,void ftrace_trace_stack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags,int skip,int pc); +void ftrace_trace_stack_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags, +int skip,int pc,struct pt_regs *regs); +void ftrace_trace_userstack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags,int pc);@@ -400,6 +403,12 @@ static inline void ftrace_trace_stack(struct ring_buffer *buffer, { } +static inline void ftrace_trace_stack_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer, +unsigned long flags,int skip, +int pc,struct pt_regs *regs) +{ +} +static inline void ftrace_trace_userstack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags,int pc) {kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c +4
-2@@ -1397,7 +1397,8 @@ static __kprobes void kprobe_trace_func(struct kprobe *kp, struct pt_regs *regs)store_trace_args (sizeof (*entry), tp, regs, (u8 *)&entry[1 ], dsize);if (!filter_current_check_discard (buffer, call, entry, event)) -trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit (buffer, event, irq_flags, pc); +trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs (buffer, event, + irq_flags, pc, regs); }/* Kretprobe handler */ @@ -1429,7 +1430,8 @@ static __kprobes void kretprobe_trace_func(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,store_trace_args (sizeof (*entry), tp, regs, (u8 *)&entry[1 ], dsize);if (!filter_current_check_discard (buffer, call, entry, event)) -trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit (buffer, event, irq_flags, pc); +trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs (buffer, event, + irq_flags, pc, regs); }/* Event entry printers */ Signature · 4 lines
Masami HIRAMATSU Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Center Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory E-mail: [email protected]
Signature · 4 lines
Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com
Steven Rostedt
maintainerQuoted 9 lines · Masami Hiramatsu
Quoted 5 lines · Masami Hiramatsu
Fix to support kernel stack trace correctly on kprobe-tracer. Since the execution path of kprobe-based dynamic events is different from other tracepoint-based events, normal
ftrace_trace_stack()doesn't work correctly. To fix that, this introducesftrace_trace_stack_regs()which traces stack viapt_regsinstead of current stack register.Hmm, any comments?
Hi Masami,
I've been traveling, and I'm way behind in my email. I'll take a look at this later today.
Thanks,
-- Steve
Steven Rostedt
maintainerQuoted 6 lines · Masami Hiramatsu
Fix to support kernel stack trace correctly on kprobe-tracer. Since the execution path of kprobe-based dynamic events is different from other tracepoint-based events, normal
ftrace_trace_stack()doesn't work correctly. To fix that, this introducesftrace_trace_stack_regs()which traces stack viapt_regsinstead of current stack register.
Hi Masami,
I'm working to get a "fix" patch set push out, and I included this patch. But when I ran it on my arch test (compiling on other archs), this patch broke the following:
arm, blackfin, powerpc, s390.
(Note, due to other bugs, UML and mips does not build to test)
The problem is that these archs do not implement a:
save_stack_trace_regs() function.
I'm stripping this patch out of my next pull request, and it may need to wait till 2.6.41/2.8.1/3.1.
-- Steve
Quoted 189 lines
e.g.
# echo p schedule > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/options/stacktrace # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/enable # head -n 20 /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace # tracer: nop # # TASK-PID CPU# TIMESTAMP FUNCTION # | | | | | sshd-1549 [001] 857.326335: p_schedule_0: (schedule+0x0/0x900) sshd-1549 [001] 857.326337: <stack trace> => schedule_hrtimeout_range => poll_schedule_timeout => do_select => core_sys_select => sys_select => system_call_fastpath tee-1751 [000] 857.326394: p_schedule_0: (schedule+0x0/0x900) tee-1751 [000] 857.326395: <stack trace> => do_group_exit => sys_exit_group => system_call_fastpath <idle>-0 [001] 857.326406: p_schedule_0: (schedule+0x0/0x900) <idle>-0 [001] 857.326407: <stack trace> => start_secondarySigned-off-by Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>Cc Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>Cc Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>Cc Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>Cc Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>Cc Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>--- include/linux/ftrace_event.h | 4 ++++ kernel/trace/trace.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- kernel/trace/trace.h | 9 +++++++++ kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 6 ++++-- 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)include/linux/ftrace_event.h +4
-0@@ -117,6 +117,10 @@ void trace_current_buffer_unlock_commit(struct ring_buffer *buffer,void trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit (struct ring_buffer *buffer,struct ring_buffer_event *event,unsigned long flags,int pc); +void trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer, +struct ring_buffer_event *event, +unsigned long flags,int pc, +struct pt_regs *regs);void trace_current_buffer_discard_commit (struct ring_buffer *buffer,struct ring_buffer_event *event);kernel/trace/trace.c +30
-5@@ -1191,6 +1191,18 @@ void trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit(struct ring_buffer *buffer, }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit); +void trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer, +struct ring_buffer_event *event, +unsigned long flags,int pc, +struct pt_regs *regs) +{ +ring_buffer_unlock_commit (buffer, event); + +ftrace_trace_stack_regs (buffer, flags,0 , pc, regs); +ftrace_trace_userstack (buffer, flags, pc); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs); +void trace_current_buffer_discard_commit (struct ring_buffer *buffer,struct ring_buffer_event *event) {@@ -1236,7 +1248,7 @@ ftrace(struct trace_array *tr, struct trace_array_cpu *data,#ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE static void __ftrace_trace_stack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags, -int skip,int pc) +int skip,int pc,struct pt_regs *regs) {struct ftrace_event_call *call = &event_kernel_stack;struct ring_buffer_event *event;@@ -1255,24 +1267,36 @@ static void __ftrace_trace_stack(struct ring_buffer *buffer, trace.skip = skip; trace.entries = entry->caller; -save_stack_trace (&trace); +if (regs) +save_stack_trace_regs (&trace, regs); +else +save_stack_trace (&trace);if (!filter_check_discard (call, entry, buffer, event))ring_buffer_unlock_commit (buffer, event); } +void ftrace_trace_stack_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags, +int skip,int pc,struct pt_regs *regs) +{ +if (!(trace_flags &TRACE_ITER_STACKTRACE )) +return ; + +__ftrace_trace_stack (buffer, flags, skip, pc, regs); +} +void ftrace_trace_stack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags,int skip,int pc) {if (!(trace_flags &TRACE_ITER_STACKTRACE ))return ; -__ftrace_trace_stack (buffer, flags, skip, pc); +__ftrace_trace_stack (buffer, flags, skip, pc,NULL ); }void __trace_stack (struct trace_array *tr,unsigned long flags,int skip,int pc) { -__ftrace_trace_stack (tr->buffer, flags, skip, pc); +__ftrace_trace_stack (tr->buffer, flags, skip, pc,NULL ); }/** @@ -1288,7 +1312,8 @@ void trace_dump_stack(void)local_save_flags (flags);/* skipping 3 traces, seems to get us at the caller of this function */ -__ftrace_trace_stack (global_trace.buffer, flags,3 ,preempt_count ()); +__ftrace_trace_stack (global_trace.buffer, flags,3 ,preempt_count (), +NULL ); } static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, user_stack_count);kernel/trace/trace.h +9
-0@@ -389,6 +389,9 @@ void update_max_tr_single(struct trace_array *tr,void ftrace_trace_stack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags,int skip,int pc); +void ftrace_trace_stack_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags, +int skip,int pc,struct pt_regs *regs); +void ftrace_trace_userstack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags,int pc);@@ -400,6 +403,12 @@ static inline void ftrace_trace_stack(struct ring_buffer *buffer, { } +static inline void ftrace_trace_stack_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer, +unsigned long flags,int skip, +int pc,struct pt_regs *regs) +{ +} +static inline void ftrace_trace_userstack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags,int pc) {kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c +4
-2@@ -1397,7 +1397,8 @@ static __kprobes void kprobe_trace_func(struct kprobe *kp, struct pt_regs *regs)store_trace_args (sizeof (*entry), tp, regs, (u8 *)&entry[1 ], dsize);if (!filter_current_check_discard (buffer, call, entry, event)) -trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit (buffer, event, irq_flags, pc); +trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs (buffer, event, + irq_flags, pc, regs); }/* Kretprobe handler */ @@ -1429,7 +1430,8 @@ static __kprobes void kretprobe_trace_func(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,store_trace_args (sizeof (*entry), tp, regs, (u8 *)&entry[1 ], dsize);if (!filter_current_check_discard (buffer, call, entry, event)) -trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit (buffer, event, irq_flags, pc); +trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs (buffer, event, + irq_flags, pc, regs); }/* Event entry printers */
Quoted 11 lines · Steven Rostedt
Quoted 5 lines · Masami Hiramatsu
Fix to support kernel stack trace correctly on kprobe-tracer. Since the execution path of kprobe-based dynamic events is different from other tracepoint-based events, normal
ftrace_trace_stack()doesn't work correctly. To fix that, this introducesftrace_trace_stack_regs()which traces stack viapt_regsinstead of current stack register.I'm working to get a "fix" patch set push out, and I included this patch. But when I ran it on my arch test (compiling on other archs), this patch broke the following:
Quoted 7 lines
arm, blackfin, powerpc, s390.
(Note, due to other bugs, UML and mips does not build to test)
The problem is that these archs do not implement a:
save_stack_trace_regs() function.
i think only x86 implements that func ? and its stacktrace.c just seems to beg for generalization ...
-mike
Steven Rostedt
maintainerQuoted 3 lines · Mike Frysinger
Quoted 1 line
save_stack_trace_regs()function.i think only x86 implements that func ?
Looks to be the case. I didn't think so because not all archs failed. Hmm, archs like sparc compiled. Perhaps my config prevented tracing enabled? I'll need to take a deeper look.
Quoted 1 line
and its
stacktrace.cjust seems to beg for generalization ...
Looks like a project for the next merge window :)
-- Steve
Quoted 9 lines · Steven Rostedt
Quoted 3 lines · Mike Frysinger
Quoted 1 line
save_stack_trace_regs()function.i think only x86 implements that func ?
Looks to be the case. I didn't think so because not all archs failed. Hmm, archs like sparc compiled. Perhaps my config prevented tracing enabled? I'll need to take a deeper look.
Hm, at a grans, save_stack_trace_tsk() has also limited implementations, however, there is an weak symbol defined in kernel/stacktrace.c.
I think we can add save_stack_trace_regs() same way.
BTW, parameters of save_stack_trace_tsk/regs are a bit different. It would also be fixed.
Thanks,
Signature · 4 lines
Masami HIRAMATSU Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Center Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory E-mail: [email protected]
Quoted 10 lines · Steven Rostedt
Quoted 6 lines · Masami Hiramatsu
Fix to support kernel stack trace correctly on kprobe-tracer. Since the execution path of kprobe-based dynamic events is different from other tracepoint-based events, normal
ftrace_trace_stack()doesn't work correctly. To fix that, this introducesftrace_trace_stack_regs()which traces stack viapt_regsinstead of current stack register.Hi Masami,
Quoted 7 lines
I'm working to get a "fix" patch set push out, and I included this patch. But when I ran it on my arch test (compiling on other archs), this patch broke the following:
arm, blackfin, powerpc, s390.
(Note, due to other bugs, UML and mips does not build to test)
Oh... I see. Perhaps, we can refer the systemtap backtrace implementation for some of them. As far as I know, it supports arm, ppc, and s390.
Quoted 7 lines
The problem is that these archs do not implement a:
save_stack_trace_regs()function.I'm stripping this patch out of my next pull request, and it may need to wait till 2.6.41/2.8.1/3.1.
OK, thanks for the test!
Quoted 194 lines
-- Steve
Quoted 189 lines
e.g.
# echo p schedule > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/options/stacktrace # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/enable # head -n 20 /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace # tracer: nop # # TASK-PID CPU# TIMESTAMP FUNCTION # | | | | | sshd-1549 [001] 857.326335: p_schedule_0: (schedule+0x0/0x900) sshd-1549 [001] 857.326337: <stack trace> => schedule_hrtimeout_range => poll_schedule_timeout => do_select => core_sys_select => sys_select => system_call_fastpath tee-1751 [000] 857.326394: p_schedule_0: (schedule+0x0/0x900) tee-1751 [000] 857.326395: <stack trace> => do_group_exit => sys_exit_group => system_call_fastpath <idle>-0 [001] 857.326406: p_schedule_0: (schedule+0x0/0x900) <idle>-0 [001] 857.326407: <stack trace> => start_secondarySigned-off-by Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>Cc Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>Cc Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>Cc Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>Cc Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>Cc Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>--- include/linux/ftrace_event.h | 4 ++++ kernel/trace/trace.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- kernel/trace/trace.h | 9 +++++++++ kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 6 ++++-- 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)include/linux/ftrace_event.h +4
-0@@ -117,6 +117,10 @@ void trace_current_buffer_unlock_commit(struct ring_buffer *buffer,void trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit (struct ring_buffer *buffer,struct ring_buffer_event *event,unsigned long flags,int pc); +void trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer, +struct ring_buffer_event *event, +unsigned long flags,int pc, +struct pt_regs *regs);void trace_current_buffer_discard_commit (struct ring_buffer *buffer,struct ring_buffer_event *event);kernel/trace/trace.c +30
-5@@ -1191,6 +1191,18 @@ void trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit(struct ring_buffer *buffer, }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit); +void trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer, +struct ring_buffer_event *event, +unsigned long flags,int pc, +struct pt_regs *regs) +{ +ring_buffer_unlock_commit (buffer, event); + +ftrace_trace_stack_regs (buffer, flags,0 , pc, regs); +ftrace_trace_userstack (buffer, flags, pc); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs); +void trace_current_buffer_discard_commit (struct ring_buffer *buffer,struct ring_buffer_event *event) {@@ -1236,7 +1248,7 @@ ftrace(struct trace_array *tr, struct trace_array_cpu *data,#ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE static void __ftrace_trace_stack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags, -int skip,int pc) +int skip,int pc,struct pt_regs *regs) {struct ftrace_event_call *call = &event_kernel_stack;struct ring_buffer_event *event;@@ -1255,24 +1267,36 @@ static void __ftrace_trace_stack(struct ring_buffer *buffer, trace.skip = skip; trace.entries = entry->caller; -save_stack_trace (&trace); +if (regs) +save_stack_trace_regs (&trace, regs); +else +save_stack_trace (&trace);if (!filter_check_discard (call, entry, buffer, event))ring_buffer_unlock_commit (buffer, event); } +void ftrace_trace_stack_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags, +int skip,int pc,struct pt_regs *regs) +{ +if (!(trace_flags &TRACE_ITER_STACKTRACE )) +return ; + +__ftrace_trace_stack (buffer, flags, skip, pc, regs); +} +void ftrace_trace_stack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags,int skip,int pc) {if (!(trace_flags &TRACE_ITER_STACKTRACE ))return ; -__ftrace_trace_stack (buffer, flags, skip, pc); +__ftrace_trace_stack (buffer, flags, skip, pc,NULL ); }void __trace_stack (struct trace_array *tr,unsigned long flags,int skip,int pc) { -__ftrace_trace_stack (tr->buffer, flags, skip, pc); +__ftrace_trace_stack (tr->buffer, flags, skip, pc,NULL ); }/** @@ -1288,7 +1312,8 @@ void trace_dump_stack(void)local_save_flags (flags);/* skipping 3 traces, seems to get us at the caller of this function */ -__ftrace_trace_stack (global_trace.buffer, flags,3 ,preempt_count ()); +__ftrace_trace_stack (global_trace.buffer, flags,3 ,preempt_count (), +NULL ); } static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, user_stack_count);kernel/trace/trace.h +9
-0@@ -389,6 +389,9 @@ void update_max_tr_single(struct trace_array *tr,void ftrace_trace_stack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags,int skip,int pc); +void ftrace_trace_stack_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags, +int skip,int pc,struct pt_regs *regs); +void ftrace_trace_userstack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags,int pc);@@ -400,6 +403,12 @@ static inline void ftrace_trace_stack(struct ring_buffer *buffer, { } +static inline void ftrace_trace_stack_regs (struct ring_buffer *buffer, +unsigned long flags,int skip, +int pc,struct pt_regs *regs) +{ +} +static inline void ftrace_trace_userstack (struct ring_buffer *buffer,unsigned long flags,int pc) {kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c +4
-2@@ -1397,7 +1397,8 @@ static __kprobes void kprobe_trace_func(struct kprobe *kp, struct pt_regs *regs)store_trace_args (sizeof (*entry), tp, regs, (u8 *)&entry[1 ], dsize);if (!filter_current_check_discard (buffer, call, entry, event)) -trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit (buffer, event, irq_flags, pc); +trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs (buffer, event, + irq_flags, pc, regs); }/* Kretprobe handler */ @@ -1429,7 +1430,8 @@ static __kprobes void kretprobe_trace_func(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,store_trace_args (sizeof (*entry), tp, regs, (u8 *)&entry[1 ], dsize);if (!filter_current_check_discard (buffer, call, entry, event)) -trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit (buffer, event, irq_flags, pc); +trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit_regs (buffer, event, + irq_flags, pc, regs); }/* Event entry printers */