RFC: classes cleanup
Hi all,
I was looking through classes/ the other day and I noticed a few that probably don't need to be in oe-core. The list I came up with:
* base_srpm.bbclass - unused, refers to missing rpm_core.bbclass
* ccdv.bbclass - unused, not sure what this is for?
* flow-lossage.bbclass - unused, looks obsolete (refers to gcc 3.4)
* mozilla.bbclass - should this be in an upper layer?
* openmoko*.bbclass - should be in an upper layer
* patcher.bbclass - obsolete?
* singlemachine.bbclass - obsolete?
* srec.bbclass - appears to be something LinuxMIPS related. Not sure it belongs in oe-core.
* tmake.bbclass - obsolete? even oe-dev doesn't use this AFAICT...
* xfce.bbclass - should this be in an upper layer?
* xlibs.bbclass - unused, obsolete?
Comments? Any others we ought to look at removing?
Cheers,
Paul
Signature · 2 lines
Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre
Quoted 1 line · Paul Eggleton
* flow-lossage.bbclass - unused, looks obsolete (refers to gcc 3.4)
Agreed, this should be deleted. It used to be inherited by some of the gnome recipes (and, in oe.dev, still is by a few) to work around a compiler bug. But none of the recipes in oe-core do this, and we don't ship the affected compiler versions either.
There is one recipe in meta-oe which inherits this class so I guess that should be fixed before it's deleted.
p.
Quoted 10 lines · Phil Blundell
Quoted 1 line · Paul Eggleton
* flow-lossage.bbclass - unused, looks obsolete (refers to gcc 3.4)
Agreed, this should be deleted. It used to be inherited by some of the gnome recipes (and, in oe.dev, still is by a few) to work around a compiler bug. But none of the recipes in oe-core do this, and we don't ship the affected compiler versions either.
There is one recipe in meta-oe which inherits this class so I guess that should be fixed before it's deleted.
Can someone do that please as I think we should get rid of that class :)
Looking through the list there is nothing I feel we really need to keep at this point although some like patcher and singlemachine should still work...
Cheers,
Richard
Quoted 1 line · On Thursday 14 July 2011 15:55:26 Richard Purdie wrote:
Can someone do that please as I think we should get rid of that class :)
I have some pending cleanups for meta-oe including this one, will post them today.
Cheers,
Paul
Signature · 2 lines
Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre