Linux 3.0.7 now on kernel.org
I wanted to let people know that the 3.0.7 release is now downloadable in patch and full-tarball form from kernel.org:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/ as well as the incremental patches in the incr/ subdir: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/incr/
ftp.kernel.org also works for those of you using that protocol.
You will note that the files are signed with my new kernel release signing key, and that the .tar file is signed, and then compressed, so there is not signatures for the individual compressed files.
For those of you caring and wanting to verify things, the fingerprint of my signing key is:
4096R/6092693E 2011-09-23 Key fingerprint = 647F 2865 4894 E3BD 4571 99BE 38DB BDC8 6092 693E Greg Kroah-Hartman (Linux kernel stable release signing key) <[email protected]>
The 3.0.5 and 3.0.6 releases are there as well if people want them.
I'll work on the older releases as we get time, that shouldn't be that pressing of an issue at the moment.
Thanks so much to John and hpa for working hard on the tools and backend configuration to make this possible.
thanks,
greg k-h
Quoted 7 lines · Piotr Hosowicz
Quoted 3 lines · Greg KH
You will note that the files are signed with my new kernel release signing key, and that the .tar file is signed, and then compressed, so there is not signatures for the individual compressed files.
And why is that? It's less handy.
I'll let hpa answer that one, he changed it for a good reason that I can't recall at the moment :)
hpa?
thanks,
greg k-h
Quoted 7 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 6 lines · Piotr Hosowicz
Quoted 3 lines · Greg KH
You will note that the files are signed with my new kernel release signing key, and that the .tar file is signed, and then compressed, so there is not signatures for the individual compressed files.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line
And why is that? It's less handy.
I'll let hpa answer that one, he changed it for a good reason that I can't recall at the moment :)
hpa?
Signing the compressed file makes the compression "precious". It also means that the developer has to sign each.
It's not significantly "more handy" either... you can do something like:
xz -cd file.xz | gpg --verify file.sign - -hpa
Quoted 6 lines · H. Peter Anvin
[...]
Signing the compressed file makes the compression "precious". It also means that the developer has to sign each.It's not significantly "more handy" either... you can do something like:
xz -cd file.xz | gpg --verify file.sign -
On the other hand, it forces someone to decompress an untrustworthy file in order to check its signature. Should there ever be a security exploit in any of these decompressors, this practice would aid triggering it.
- FChE
Quoted 3 lines · Greg KH
You will note that the files are signed with my new kernel release signing key, and that the .tar file is signed, and then compressed, so there is not signatures for the individual compressed files.
And why is that? It's less handy.
Signature · 4 lines
- Jaka jest największa anomalia fizjologiczno-polityczna? - Członek wysunięty z ramienia na czoło. NP: Caligula's Horse - Equally Flawed NB: 3.1.0-rc3