Build breakage in sdhci-s3c

The mmc and therefore -next currently fail to build on Samsung platforms due to commit 666b6a (mmc: sdhci-s3c: Add pm_caps into SD/MMC host) which added use of a new field pm_caps in the platform data without actually adding that field to the struct.  I guess there's a separate patch floating about somewhere which adds the field but it's not in -next and both commits should be going in via the same tree to avoid bisection breakage - ideally both the field and its use should be added as part of a single commit.

and I found out that the following patch wasn't applied This patch was acked by you and Thomas.

http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/7832
This patch has the title : [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add pm_caps into platform data

Could you help me to solve the below problem ?

Quoted 8 lines · Sangwook Lee

and I found out that the following patch wasn't applied This  patch was acked by you and Thomas.

http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/7832
This patch has the title : [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add pm_caps into platform data

Could you help me to solve the below problem ?

Probably the simplest/best solution here is for Chris to apply this patch with Kukjin and Thomas' acks to the mmc tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Quoted 2 lines · Sangwook Lee

and I found out that the following patch wasn't applied This patch was acked by you and Thomas.

Quoted 5 lines

http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/7832
This patch has the title : [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add pm_caps into platform data

Could you help me to solve the below problem ?

Probably the simplest/best solution here is for Chris to apply this patch with Kukjin and Thomas' acks to the mmc tree.