ARM context switch changes for -next
Hi Stephen,
Could you please pull the branch below into -next? I'd like to give it a few weeks of exposure before sending an official pull request to Russell. One of the patches introduces a scheduler hook and Peter Z agreed with it. You may get a conflict in -next since some scheduler files have been renamed.
Thanks.
The following changes since commit 384703b8e6cd4c8ef08512e596024e028c91c339:
Linux 3.2-rc6 (2011-12-16 18:36:26 -0800)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cmarinas/linux.git intr-ctxsw
Catalin Marinas (4):
sched: Introduce the finish_arch_post_lock_switch() scheduler hook
ARM: Remove __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW on ASID-capable CPUs
ARM: Remove current_mm per-cpu variable
ARM: Remove __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW on pre-ARMv6 CPUs
Will Deacon (2):
ARM: Use TTBR1 instead of reserved context ID
ARM: Allow ASID 0 to be allocated to tasks
arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- arch/arm/include/asm/system.h | 7 --- arch/arm/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 + arch/arm/mm/context.c | 40 ++++++-------- arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S | 9 +--- kernel/sched.c | 4 ++ 6 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
Catalin
Hi Catalin,
Quoted 6 lines · On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 18:14:18 +0000 Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>…
Could you please pull the branch below into -next? I'd like to give it a few weeks of exposure before sending an official pull request to Russell. One of the patches introduces a scheduler hook and Peter Z agreed with it. You may get a conflict in -next since some scheduler files have been renamed.
Do you expect this to be merged by Linus during the 3.3 merge window? If so, it s a bit late (I expect Linus to do the 3.2 release any time). If not, I would like not to add it to -next until after v3.3-rc1 is released so that it doesn't complicate things for the merge window.
Signature · 3 lines
Cheers, Stephen Rothwell [email protected] http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Hi Stephen,
Quoted 11 lines · Stephen Rothwell
Quoted 5 lines · On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 18:14:18 +0000 Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>…
Could you please pull the branch below into -next? I'd like to give it a few weeks of exposure before sending an official pull request to Russell. One of the patches introduces a scheduler hook and Peter Z agreed with it. You may get a conflict in -next since some scheduler files have been renamed.
Do you expect this to be merged by Linus during the 3.3 merge window? If so, it s a bit late (I expect Linus to do the 3.2 release any time). If not, I would like not to add it to -next until after v3.3-rc1 is released so that it doesn't complicate things for the merge window.
These patches are aimed for 3.4, not the upcoming merging window.
I'll ping you again after 3.3-rc1.
Thanks.
Signature · 1 line
Catalin