FTS does not support large files on 32-bit
Quoted 7 lines · Mathieu Desnoyers
Hi Yannick,
The babeltrace commit:
We should therefore go back to FTW to support large files on 32-bit. Is there any reason why we moved from ftw to fts ?
FTS does not use callbacks, which makes it easier to use. Also since it was supposed to be part of the babeltrace API, not having to manage a callbacks looked better.
Might had other reasons at the time, but now I don't see any more.
Yannick
Hi Yannick and Julien,
Quoted 5 lines · Yannick Brosseau
FTS does not use callbacks, which makes it easier to use. Also since it was supposed to be part of the babeltrace API, not having to manage a callbacks looked better.
Might had other reasons at the time, but now I don't see any more.
Are you making any progress in supplying large file support in babeltrace?
Would it be helpful if I filed a bug report?
Cheers,
Fredrik Östman
Quoted 8 lines · * Oestman, Fredrik ([email protected]) wrote:
Hi Yannick and Julien,
Quoted 4 lines · Yannick Brosseau
FTS does not use callbacks, which makes it easier to use. Also since it was supposed to be part of the babeltrace API, not having to manage a callbacks looked better.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
Might had other reasons at the time, but now I don't see any more.
Are you making any progress in supplying large file support in babeltrace?
Would it be helpful if I filed a bug report?
Julien was on vacation last week. Hopefully he will make progress on this issue within the next week. Adding a bug entry would be helpful to track this issue, yes.
Thanks,
Mathieu
Quoted 11 lines
Cheers,
Fredrik Östman
_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
Signature · 4 lines
Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com