Richard Purdie : meta/classes: Update recrdeptask fields for recursive dependency handling changes in bitbake
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20120704134932.B766810217@opal
Quoted 11 lines · On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 01:49:32PM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
Module: openembedded-core.git Branch: master Commit: 8229fb5d7205f5e5b198ab2860fbcc02054476eb URL: http://git.openembedded.org/?p=openembedded-core.git&a=commit;h=8229fb5d7205f5e5b198ab2860fbcc02054476ebAuthor: Richard Purdie <[email protected]> Date: Mon Jul 2 12:27:46 2012 +0000meta/classes: Update recrdeptask fields for recursive dependency handling changes in bitbake
This also deletes the buildall task since I seen usecases for it.
Is there a typo in last sentence? :)
I've seenBB_DEFAULT_TASK = "buildall"
in my local.conf and now it had to go..
Cheers,
Quoted 99 lines
Signed-off-by Richard Purdie <[email protected]>---
meta/classes/distrodata.bbclass | 8 ++++---- meta/classes/recipe_sanity.bbclass | 3 +-- meta/classes/utility-tasks.bbclass | 10 ++-------- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)meta/classes/distrodata.bbclass +4
-4@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ python do_distrodata() { } addtask distrodataall after do_distrodata -do_distrodataall[recrdeptask] = "do_distrodata" +do_distrodataall[recrdeptask] = "do_distrodataall do_distrodata" do_distrodataall[nostamp] = "1" do_distrodataall() { :@@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ python do_checkpkg() { } addtask checkpkgall after do_checkpkg -do_checkpkgall[recrdeptask] = "do_checkpkg" +do_checkpkgall[recrdeptask] = "do_checkpkgall do_checkpkg" do_checkpkgall[nostamp] = "1" do_checkpkgall() { :@@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ python do_distro_check() { } addtask distro_checkall after do_distro_check -do_distro_checkall[recrdeptask] = "do_distro_check" +do_distro_checkall[recrdeptask] = "do_distro_checkall do_distro_check" do_distro_checkall[nostamp] = "1" do_distro_checkall() { :@@ -727,7 +727,7 @@ python do_checklicense() { } addtask checklicenseall after do_checklicense -do_checklicenseall[recrdeptask] = "do_checklicense" +do_checklicenseall[recrdeptask] = "do_checklicenseall do_checklicense" do_checklicenseall[nostamp] = "1" do_checklicenseall() { :meta/classes/recipe_sanity.bbclass +1
-2@@ -136,11 +136,10 @@ python do_recipe_sanity () { bad_runtime_vars(cfgdata, d) } do_recipe_sanity[nostamp] = "1" -#do_recipe_sanity[recrdeptask] = "do_recipe_sanity" addtask recipe_sanity do_recipe_sanity_all[nostamp] = "1" -do_recipe_sanity_all[recrdeptask] = "do_recipe_sanity" +do_recipe_sanity_all[recrdeptask] = "do_recipe_sanity_all do_recipe_sanity" do_recipe_sanity_all () { : }meta/classes/utility-tasks.bbclass +2
-8@@ -46,20 +46,14 @@ python do_checkuri() { } addtask checkuriall after do_checkuri -do_checkuriall[recrdeptask] = "do_checkuri" +do_checkuriall[recrdeptask] = "do_checkuriall do_checkuri" do_checkuriall[nostamp] = "1" do_checkuriall() { : } addtask fetchall after do_fetch -do_fetchall[recrdeptask] = "do_fetch" +do_fetchall[recrdeptask] = "do_fetchall do_fetch" do_fetchall() { : } - -addtask buildall after do_build -do_buildall[recrdeptask] = "do_build" -do_buildall() { - : -}_______________________________________________
Openembedded-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-commits
Signature · 1 line
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
Quoted 11 lines · Martin Jansa
Quoted 10 lines · On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 01:49:32PM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
Module: openembedded-core.git Branch: master Commit: 8229fb5d7205f5e5b198ab2860fbcc02054476eb URL: http://git.openembedded.org/?p=openembedded-core.git&a=commit;h=8229fb5d7205f5e5b198ab2860fbcc02054476ebAuthor: Richard Purdie <[email protected]> Date: Mon Jul 2 12:27:46 2012 +0000meta/classes: Update recrdeptask fields for recursive dependency handling changes in bitbake
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line
This also deletes the buildall task since I seen usecases for it.
Is there a typo in last sentence? :)
I've seen
BB_DEFAULT_TASK= "buildall"
in my local.conf and now it had to go..
Yes, it is a typo, sorry.
If someone can show me a good usecase for it we can add it back but I'm not seeing one right now...
Cheers,
Richard