fs/ntfs/super.c:2717:1-14: alloc with no test
Hi Anton,
FYI, coccinelle warns about
fs/ntfs/super.c:2717:1-14: alloc with no test, possible model on line 2718
vim +2717 fs/ntfs/super.c
2714 sb->s_flags |= MS_RDONLY;
2715 #endif /* ! NTFS_RW */
2716 /* Allocate a new ntfs_volume and place it in sb->s_fs_info. */
Quoted 1 line
2717
sb->s_fs_info=kmalloc(sizeof(ntfs_volume), GFP_NOFS);
2718 vol = NTFS_SB(sb);
2719 if (!vol) {
2720 if (!silent)
---
0-DAY kernel build testing backend Open Source Technology Centre
Fengguang Wu <[email protected]> Intel Corporation
Quoted 12 lines · Fengguang Wu
Hi Anton,
FYI, coccinelle warns about
fs/ntfs/super.c:2717:1-14: alloc with no test, possible model on line 2718
vim +2717
fs/ntfs/super.c
2714sb->s_flags|=MS_RDONLY;
2715 #endif /* !NTFS_RW*/
2716 /* Allocate a newntfs_volumeand place it insb->s_fs_info. */Quoted 1 line
2717
sb->s_fs_info=kmalloc(sizeof(ntfs_volume), GFP_NOFS);
That's i think a false alarm.
Quoted 1 line
2718 vol = NTFS_SB(sb);
The NTFS_SB(buf) {
buf->s_fs_info;}
so we are validating the allocated pointer s_fs_info.
correct me if i am wrong.
Thanks,
Quoted 11 lines
2719 if (!vol) { 2720 if (!silent)---
0-DAY kernel build testing backend Open Source Technology Centre
Fengguang Wu <[email protected]> Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Quoted 16 lines · devendra.aaru
Quoted 12 lines · Fengguang Wu
Hi Anton,
FYI, coccinelle warns about
fs/ntfs/super.c:2717:1-14: alloc with no test, possible model on line 2718
vim +2717
fs/ntfs/super.c
2714sb->s_flags|=MS_RDONLY;
2715 #endif /* !NTFS_RW*/
2716 /* Allocate a newntfs_volumeand place it insb->s_fs_info. */Quoted 1 line
2717
sb->s_fs_info=kmalloc(sizeof(ntfs_volume), GFP_NOFS);That's i think a false alarm.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line
2718 vol = NTFS_SB(sb);The NTFS_SB(buf) { buf->s_fs_info;}
so we are validating the allocated pointer
s_fs_info.
Yes, it is. Sorry for the noise!
Thanks,
Fengguang