Acceptance criteria of barebox bootloader in OE-Core
Hi,
I have some recipes building barebox bootloader http://barebox.org/
which I'm using in custom BSP and in meta-fsl-arm :
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-fsl-arm/tree/recipes-bsp/barebox
This recipe needs a little bit of polish but before doing that I wanted to know if it could be integrated in oe-core like is actually u-boot ?
http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot
If yes, I'll provide a patch with a working barebox for at least qemuarm.
This would allow BSP to share at least the barebox.inc of oe-core/Yocto.
Thanks
Eric
Quoted 6 lines · Eric Bénard
Hi,
I have some recipes building barebox bootloader http://barebox.org/
which I'm using in custom BSP and in meta-fsl-arm :
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-fsl-arm/tree/recipes-bsp/barebox
Quoted 8 lines
This recipe needs a little bit of polish but before doing that I wanted to know if it could be integrated in oe-core like is actually u-boot ?
http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/recipes-bsp/u-bootIf yes, I'll provide a patch with a working barebox for at least qemuarm.
This would allow BSP to share at least the barebox.inc of oe-core/Yocto.
I support the addition of barebox as this is a nice and popular bootloader; I see no problem in supporting one more alternative and this reduces the duplication and overlapping work.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br