cpuidle_get_cpu_driver livelocks idle system
The 3.7 kernel grinds to a halt on boot of a system with 2048 cpus. NMI showed most of the cpus in _raw_spin_lock in cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(). (backtrace below)
A quick look at cpuidle_get_cpu_driver() shows the hot lock.
In drivers/cpuidle/driver.c:
--------------------------------------------------------
/**
* cpuidle_get_cpu_driver - return the driver tied with a cpu */
struct cpuidle_driver *cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
{
struct cpuidle_driver *drv;
if (!dev)
return NULL;
spin_lock(&cpuidle_driver_lock);
drv = __cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(dev->cpu);
spin_unlock(&cpuidle_driver_lock);
return drv;
}--------------------------------------------------------
This change was added in on Nov 14th, 2012.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commit;h=bf4d1b5ddb78f86078ac6ae0415802d5f0c68f92
The patch says it adds support for cpus with different characteristics, but adds a big global lock. The comment claims "no impact for the other platforms if the option is disabled", which leads me to believe the spin_lock was added inadvertently. CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERS is off in my config file.
linux$ grep CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERS .config
# CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERS is not set
As more cpus become idle, more cpus fight over the lock until the system livelocks on the crushing weight of idle.
The fix may be to move the spin_lock into __cpuidle_get_cpu_driver, which has different versions for CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERS, to avoid impacting the disabled case, or get rid of the spin_lock all together.
--------------------------------------------------------
== UV NMI process trace cpu 12: ==
CPU 12
Pid: 0, comm: swapper/12 Tainted: G O 3.7.0.rja-sgi+ #38
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81614e45>] [<ffffffff81614e45>] _raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30 [...] Call Trace: [<ffffffff814c891c>] cpuidle_get_cpu_driver+0x1c/0x30 [<ffffffff814c871d>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x7d/0x1b0 [<ffffffff8101d08d>] cpu_idle+0xdd/0x130 [<ffffffff8160a3ea>] start_secondary+0xc6/0xcc --------------------------------------------------------
Signature · 2 lines
Russ Anderson, OS RAS/Partitioning Project Lead SGI - Silicon Graphics Inc [email protected]
Quoted 24 lines · Russ Anderson
The 3.7 kernel grinds to a halt on boot of a system with 2048 cpus. NMI showed most of the cpus in
_raw_spin_lockincpuidle_get_cpu_driver(). (backtrace below)A quick look at
cpuidle_get_cpu_driver()shows the hot lock.In
drivers/cpuidle/driver.c:
--------------------------------------------------------
/**
*cpuidle_get_cpu_driver- return the driver tied with a cpu */
structcpuidle_driver*cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(structcpuidle_device*dev){ struct cpuidle_driver *drv; if (!dev) return NULL; spin_lock(&cpuidle_driver_lock); drv = __cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(dev->cpu); spin_unlock(&cpuidle_driver_lock); return drv; }
Quoted 1 line
--------------------------------------------------------
Hi Russ,
thanks for investigating the problem. You are right, there is a bottleneck here.
Regarding how is used the cpuidle code, I think it is safe to remove the locks.
Quoted 34 lines
This change was added in on Nov 14th, 2012.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commit;h=bf4d1b5ddb78f86078ac6ae0415802d5f0c68f92The patch says it adds support for cpus with different characteristics, but adds a big global lock. The comment claims "no impact for the other platforms if the option is disabled", which leads me to believe the
spin_lockwas added inadvertently.CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERSis off in my config file.linux$ grep
CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERS.config
#CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERSis not setAs more cpus become idle, more cpus fight over the lock until the system livelocks on the crushing weight of idle.
The fix may be to move the
spin_lockinto__cpuidle_get_cpu_driver, which has different versions forCONFIG_CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERS, to avoid impacting the disabled case, or get rid of thespin_lockall together.--------------------------------------------------------
== UV NMI process trace cpu 12: ==
CPU 12
Pid: 0, comm: swapper/12 Tainted: G O 3.7.0.rja-sgi+ #38RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81614e45>] [<ffffffff81614e45>] _raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30 [...] Call Trace: [<ffffffff814c891c>] cpuidle_get_cpu_driver+0x1c/0x30 [<ffffffff814c871d>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x7d/0x1b0 [<ffffffff8101d08d>] cpu_idle+0xdd/0x130 [<ffffffff8160a3ea>] start_secondary+0xc6/0xcc --------------------------------------------------------
Signature · 5 lines
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Quoted 27 lines · Daniel Lezcano
Quoted 24 lines · Russ Anderson
The 3.7 kernel grinds to a halt on boot of a system with 2048 cpus. NMI showed most of the cpus in
_raw_spin_lockincpuidle_get_cpu_driver(). (backtrace below)A quick look at
cpuidle_get_cpu_driver()shows the hot lock.In
drivers/cpuidle/driver.c:
--------------------------------------------------------
/**
*cpuidle_get_cpu_driver- return the driver tied with a cpu */
structcpuidle_driver*cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(structcpuidle_device*dev){ struct cpuidle_driver *drv; if (!dev) return NULL; spin_lock(&cpuidle_driver_lock); drv = __cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(dev->cpu); spin_unlock(&cpuidle_driver_lock); return drv; }Quoted 1 line
--------------------------------------------------------
Quoted 7 lines
Hi Russ,
thanks for investigating the problem. You are right, there is a bottleneck here.
Regarding how is used the cpuidle code, I think it is safe to remove the locks.
OK, a patch would be appreciated. :-)
If you prepare one, please explain in the changelog why it is safe to drop the locks.
Thanks,
Rafael
Quoted 37 lines
Quoted 34 lines
This change was added in on Nov 14th, 2012.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commit;h=bf4d1b5ddb78f86078ac6ae0415802d5f0c68f92The patch says it adds support for cpus with different characteristics, but adds a big global lock. The comment claims "no impact for the other platforms if the option is disabled", which leads me to believe the
spin_lockwas added inadvertently.CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERSis off in my config file.linux$ grep
CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERS.config
#CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERSis not setAs more cpus become idle, more cpus fight over the lock until the system livelocks on the crushing weight of idle.
The fix may be to move the
spin_lockinto__cpuidle_get_cpu_driver, which has different versions forCONFIG_CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERS, to avoid impacting the disabled case, or get rid of thespin_lockall together.--------------------------------------------------------
== UV NMI process trace cpu 12: ==
CPU 12
Pid: 0, comm: swapper/12 Tainted: G O 3.7.0.rja-sgi+ #38RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81614e45>] [<ffffffff81614e45>] _raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30 [...] Call Trace: [<ffffffff814c891c>] cpuidle_get_cpu_driver+0x1c/0x30 [<ffffffff814c871d>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x7d/0x1b0 [<ffffffff8101d08d>] cpu_idle+0xdd/0x130 [<ffffffff8160a3ea>] start_secondary+0xc6/0xcc --------------------------------------------------------
Signature · 2 lines
I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
Quoted 33 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
Quoted 32 lines · Daniel Lezcano
Quoted 24 lines · Russ Anderson
The 3.7 kernel grinds to a halt on boot of a system with 2048 cpus. NMI showed most of the cpus in
_raw_spin_lockincpuidle_get_cpu_driver(). (backtrace below)A quick look at
cpuidle_get_cpu_driver()shows the hot lock.In
drivers/cpuidle/driver.c:
--------------------------------------------------------
/**
*cpuidle_get_cpu_driver- return the driver tied with a cpu */
structcpuidle_driver*cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(structcpuidle_device*dev){ struct cpuidle_driver *drv; if (!dev) return NULL; spin_lock(&cpuidle_driver_lock); drv = __cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(dev->cpu); spin_unlock(&cpuidle_driver_lock); return drv; }Quoted 1 line
--------------------------------------------------------
Hi Russ,
thanks for investigating the problem. You are right, there is a bottleneck here.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Regarding how is used the cpuidle code, I think it is safe to remove the locks.
OK, a patch would be appreciated. :-)
If you prepare one, please explain in the changelog why it is safe to drop the locks.
Ok, sure. I have some troubles with my x86 hardware, so it could take a couple of days before I can send a fix a bit tested.
Quoted 37 lines
Quoted 37 lines
Quoted 34 lines
This change was added in on Nov 14th, 2012.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commit;h=bf4d1b5ddb78f86078ac6ae0415802d5f0c68f92The patch says it adds support for cpus with different characteristics, but adds a big global lock. The comment claims "no impact for the other platforms if the option is disabled", which leads me to believe the
spin_lockwas added inadvertently.CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERSis off in my config file.linux$ grep
CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERS.config
#CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERSis not setAs more cpus become idle, more cpus fight over the lock until the system livelocks on the crushing weight of idle.
The fix may be to move the
spin_lockinto__cpuidle_get_cpu_driver, which has different versions forCONFIG_CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERS, to avoid impacting the disabled case, or get rid of thespin_lockall together.--------------------------------------------------------
== UV NMI process trace cpu 12: ==
CPU 12
Pid: 0, comm: swapper/12 Tainted: G O 3.7.0.rja-sgi+ #38RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81614e45>] [<ffffffff81614e45>] _raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30 [...] Call Trace: [<ffffffff814c891c>] cpuidle_get_cpu_driver+0x1c/0x30 [<ffffffff814c871d>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x7d/0x1b0 [<ffffffff8101d08d>] cpu_idle+0xdd/0x130 [<ffffffff8160a3ea>] start_secondary+0xc6/0xcc --------------------------------------------------------
Signature · 5 lines
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog