btrfs: add "no file data" flag to btrfs send ioctl
PATCH 1/1 btrfs: add "no file data" flag to btrfs send ioctl
This patch adds the flag, BTRFS_SEND_FLAG_NO_FILE_DATA to the btrfs send ioctl code. When this flag is set, the btrfs send code will never write file data into the stream (thus also avoiding expensive reads of that data in the first place). BTRFS_SEND_C_UPDATE_EXTENT commands will be sent (instead of BTRFS_SEND_C_WRITE) with an offset, length pair indicating the extent in question.
This patch does not affect the operation of BTRFS_SEND_C_CLONE commands - they will continue to be sent when a search finds an appropriate extent to clone from.
--- fs/btrfs/ioctl.h | 7 +++++++ fs/btrfs/send.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- fs/btrfs/send.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
fs/btrfs/ioctl.h +7 -0
@@ -363,6 +363,13 @@ struct btrfs_ioctl_received_subvol_args {__u64 reserved[16 ];/* in */ }; +/* +* Caller doesn't want file data in the send stream, even if the +* search of clone sources doesn't find an extent. UPDATE_EXTENT +* commands will be sent instead of WRITE commands. +*/ +#define BTRFS_SEND_FLAG_NO_FILE_DATA 0x1 +struct btrfs_ioctl_send_args {__s64 send_fd;/* in */ __u64 clone_sources_count;/* in */
fs/btrfs/send.c +41 -4
76 lines not on this page · raw message
fs/btrfs/send.h +1 -0
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ enum btrfs_send_cmd {BTRFS_SEND_C_UTIMES ,BTRFS_SEND_C_END , +BTRFS_SEND_C_UPDATE_EXTENT , __BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX, };#define BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX (__BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX - 1)
Signature · 1 line
1.7.7
fs/btrfs/send.c long btrfs_ioctl_send(struct file *mnt_file, void __user *arg_) · line 4609
Quoted 5 lines · Mark Fasheh
fs/btrfs/send.c +4
-0+#define BTRFS_SEND_FLAG_NO_FILE_DATA 0x1 + + sctx->flags = arg->flags; +
For compatibility reasons, you should mask the user input value and only allow the supported flag(s).
david
Quoted 9 lines · David Sterba
Review
Quoted 5 lines · Mark Fasheh
(quoted diff) +4
-0+#define BTRFS_SEND_FLAG_NO_FILE_DATA 0x1 + + sctx->flags = arg->flags; +For compatibility reasons, you should mask the user input value and only allow the supported flag(s).
Fixed, and tested. Thanks for the review David!
--Mark
--
Mark Fasheh
Quoted 1 line
From
601b60fa3fa9e319c11f91fd317dda3fac43b955Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
btrfs: add "no file data" flag to btrfs send ioctl
This patch adds the flag, BTRFS_SEND_FLAG_NO_FILE_DATA to the btrfs send ioctl code. When this flag is set, the btrfs send code will never write file data into the stream (thus also avoiding expensive reads of that data in the first place). BTRFS_SEND_C_UPDATE_EXTENT commands will be sent (instead of BTRFS_SEND_C_WRITE) with an offset, length pair indicating the extent in question.
This patch does not affect the operation of BTRFS_SEND_C_CLONE commands - they will continue to be sent when a search finds an appropriate extent to clone from.
--- fs/btrfs/ioctl.h | 7 +++++++ fs/btrfs/send.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- fs/btrfs/send.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
fs/btrfs/ioctl.h +7 -0
@@ -363,6 +363,13 @@ struct btrfs_ioctl_received_subvol_args {__u64 reserved[16 ];/* in */ }; +/* +* Caller doesn't want file data in the send stream, even if the +* search of clone sources doesn't find an extent. UPDATE_EXTENT +* commands will be sent instead of WRITE commands. +*/ +#define BTRFS_SEND_FLAG_NO_FILE_DATA 0x1 +struct btrfs_ioctl_send_args {__s64 send_fd;/* in */ __u64 clone_sources_count;/* in */
fs/btrfs/send.c +44 -4
79 lines not on this page · raw message
fs/btrfs/send.h +1 -0
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ enum btrfs_send_cmd {BTRFS_SEND_C_UTIMES ,BTRFS_SEND_C_END , +BTRFS_SEND_C_UPDATE_EXTENT , __BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX, };#define BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX (__BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX - 1)
Signature · 1 line
1.7.7
Quoted 135 lines · Mark Fasheh
Quoted 9 lines · David Sterba
fs/btrfs/send.c long btrfs_ioctl_send(struct file *mnt_file, void __user *arg_) · line 4612
Quoted 5 lines · Mark Fasheh
fs/btrfs/send.c +4
-0+#define BTRFS_SEND_FLAG_NO_FILE_DATA 0x1 + + sctx->flags = arg->flags; +For compatibility reasons, you should mask the user input value and only allow the supported flag(s).
Fixed, and tested. Thanks for the review David!
--Mark--
Mark FashehQuoted 1 line
From
601b60fa3fa9e319c11f91fd317dda3fac43b955Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001btrfs: add "no file data" flag to btrfs send ioctl
This patch adds the flag,
BTRFS_SEND_FLAG_NO_FILE_DATAto the btrfs send ioctl code. When this flag is set, the btrfs send code will never write file data into the stream (thus also avoiding expensive reads of that data in the first place).BTRFS_SEND_C_UPDATE_EXTENTcommands will be sent (instead ofBTRFS_SEND_C_WRITE) with an offset, length pair indicating the extent in question.This patch does not affect the operation of
BTRFS_SEND_C_CLONEcommands - they will continue to be sent when a search finds an appropriate extent to clone from.Signed-off-by Mark Fasheh <[email protected]>--- fs/btrfs/ioctl.h | 7 +++++++ fs/btrfs/send.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- fs/btrfs/send.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)fs/btrfs/ioctl.h +7
-0@@ -363,6 +363,13 @@ struct btrfs_ioctl_received_subvol_args {__u64 reserved[16 ];/* in */ }; +/* +* Caller doesn't want file data in the send stream, even if the +* search of clone sources doesn't find an extent. UPDATE_EXTENT +* commands will be sent instead of WRITE commands. +*/ +#define BTRFS_SEND_FLAG_NO_FILE_DATA 0x1 +struct btrfs_ioctl_send_args {__s64 send_fd;/* in */ __u64 clone_sources_count;/* in */ fs/btrfs/send.c +39
-4@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ struct send_ctx {u32 send_max_size;u64 total_send_size;u64 cmd_send_size[BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX +1 ]; +u64 flags;/* 'flags' member of btrfs_ioctl_send_args is u64 */ struct vfsmount *mnt;@@ -3707,6 +3708,39 @@ out:return ret; } +/* +* Send an update extent command to user space. +*/ +static int send_update_extent (struct send_ctx *sctx, +u64 offset,u32 len) +{ +int ret =0 ; +struct fs_path *p; + + p =fs_path_alloc (sctx); +if (!p) +return -ENOMEM ; + + ret =begin_cmd (sctx,BTRFS_SEND_C_UPDATE_EXTENT ); +if (ret <0 ) + goto out; + + ret =get_cur_path (sctx, sctx->cur_ino, sctx->cur_inode_gen, p); +if (ret <0 ) + goto out; + +TLV_PUT_PATH (sctx,BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH , p); +TLV_PUT_U64 (sctx,BTRFS_SEND_A_FILE_OFFSET , offset); +TLV_PUT_U64 (sctx,BTRFS_SEND_A_SIZE , len); + + ret =send_cmd (sctx); + +tlv_put_failure: +out: +fs_path_free (sctx, p); +return ret; +} + static int send_write_or_clone(struct send_ctx *sctx, struct btrfs_path *path, struct btrfs_key *key,@@ -3742,7 +3776,11 @@ static int send_write_or_clone(struct send_ctx *sctx, goto out; } -if (!clone_root) { +if (clone_root) { + ret =send_clone (sctx, offset, len, clone_root); + }else if (sctx->flags &BTRFS_SEND_FLAG_NO_FILE_DATA ) { + ret =send_update_extent (sctx, offset, len); + }else {while (pos < len) { l = len - pos;if (l >BTRFS_SEND_READ_SIZE )@@ -3755,10 +3793,7 @@ static int send_write_or_clone(struct send_ctx *sctx, pos += ret; } ret =0 ; - }else { - ret =send_clone (sctx, offset, len, clone_root); } - out:return ret; }
fs/btrfs/send.c long btrfs_ioctl_send(struct file *mnt_file, void __user *arg_) · line 4610
Quoted 6 lines
fs/btrfs/send.c +2
-0@@ -4570,6 +4605,11 @@ long btrfs_ioctl_send(struct file *mnt_file, void __user *arg_)INIT_RADIX_TREE (&sctx->name_cache,GFP_NOFS );INIT_LIST_HEAD (&sctx->name_cache_list); +if (arg->flags & ~BTRFS_SEND_FLAG_NO_FILE_DATA ) +return -EINVAL ;
I like
#define BTRFS_SEND_FLAGS (BTRFS_SEND_FLAG_NO_FILE_DATA | ...) if (arg->flags & ~BTRFS_SEND_FLAGS) return -EINVAL;
even if current flag is only one.
Thanks,
Tsutomu
Quoted 19 lines
fs/btrfs/send.c +3
-0+ + sctx->flags = arg->flags; + sctx->send_filp =fget (arg->send_fd);if (IS_ERR (sctx->send_filp)) {ret = PTR_ERR(sctx->send_filp);fs/btrfs/send.h +1
-0@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ enum btrfs_send_cmd {BTRFS_SEND_C_UTIMES ,BTRFS_SEND_C_END , +BTRFS_SEND_C_UPDATE_EXTENT , __BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX, };#define BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX (__BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX - 1)