signals: eventpoll: save/restore_sigmask cleanups
cover signals: eventpoll: save/restore_sigmask cleanups
Hello.
Motivated by the recent patch from Denys. Lets cleanup this code first, other set_restore_sigmask() users can be changed too.
Perhaps it also makes sense to add the new helper which does copy_from_user + set saved_sigmask + set_current_blocked() ?
Oleg.
fs/eventpoll.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
PATCH 1/2 signals: eventpoll: do not use sigprocmask()
sigprocmask() should die. None of the current callers actually need this strange interface.
Change fs/eventpoll.c to use set_current_blocked(). This also means we should not worry about SIGKILL/SIGSTOP.
--- fs/eventpoll.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
fs/eventpoll.c +6 -6
@@ -1975,8 +1975,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(epoll_pwait, int, epfd, struct epoll_event __user *, events,return -EINVAL ;if (copy_from_user (&ksigmask, sigmask,sizeof (ksigmask)))return -EFAULT ; -sigdelsetmask (&ksigmask,sigmask (SIGKILL ) |sigmask (SIGSTOP )); -sigprocmask (SIG_SETMASK , &ksigmask, &sigsaved); + sigsaved = current->blocked; +set_current_blocked (&ksigmask); } error =sys_epoll_wait (epfd, events, maxevents, timeout);
@@ -1993,7 +1993,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(epoll_pwait, int, epfd, struct epoll_event __user *, events, sizeof(sigsaved));set_restore_sigmask (); }else -sigprocmask (SIG_SETMASK , &sigsaved,NULL ); +set_current_blocked (&sigsaved); }return error;
@@ -2020,8 +2020,8 @@ COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE6(epoll_pwait, int, epfd,if (copy_from_user (&csigmask, sigmask,sizeof (csigmask)))return -EFAULT ;sigset_from_compat (&ksigmask, &csigmask); -sigdelsetmask (&ksigmask,sigmask (SIGKILL ) |sigmask (SIGSTOP )); -sigprocmask (SIG_SETMASK , &ksigmask, &sigsaved); + sigsaved = current->blocked; +set_current_blocked (&ksigmask); } err =sys_epoll_wait (epfd, events, maxevents, timeout);
@@ -2038,7 +2038,7 @@ COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE6(epoll_pwait, int, epfd, sizeof(sigsaved));set_restore_sigmask (); }else -sigprocmask (SIG_SETMASK , &sigsaved,NULL ); +set_current_blocked (&sigsaved); }return err;
Signature · 1 line
1.5.5.1
PATCH 2/2 signals: eventpoll: set ->saved_sigmask at the start
In reply to Oleg Nesterovtask_struct->saved_sigmask has no meaning unless we return with set_restore_sigmask() and nobody except current can use it.
This means that sys_epoll_pwait() doesn't need to save ->blocked into the local var and then memcopy it into ->saved_sigmask, we can simply set ->saved_sigmask right before set_current_blocked().
--- fs/eventpoll.c | 34 +++++++++++++++------------------- 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
fs/eventpoll.c +15 -19
@@ -1964,23 +1964,23 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(epoll_pwait, int, epfd, struct epoll_event __user *, events, size_t, sigsetsize) {int error; -sigset_t ksigmask, sigsaved; -/* * If the caller wants a certain signal mask to be set during the wait, * we apply it here. */ if (sigmask) { +sigset_t ksigmask; +if (sigsetsize !=sizeof (sigset_t))return -EINVAL ;if (copy_from_user (&ksigmask, sigmask,sizeof (ksigmask)))return -EFAULT ; - sigsaved = current->blocked; + + current->saved_sigmask = current->blocked;set_current_blocked (&ksigmask); } error =sys_epoll_wait (epfd, events, maxevents, timeout); -/* * If we changed the signal mask, we need to restore the original one. * In case we've got a signal while waiting, we do not restore the
@@ -1988,12 +1988,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(epoll_pwait, int, epfd, struct epoll_event __user *, events,* the way back to userspace, before the signal mask is restored. */ if (sigmask) { -if (error == -EINTR ) { -memcpy (¤t->saved_sigmask, &sigsaved, -sizeof (sigsaved)); +if (error == -EINTR )set_restore_sigmask (); - }else -set_current_blocked (&sigsaved); +else +__set_current_blocked (¤t->saved_sigmask); }return error;
@@ -2007,25 +2005,25 @@ COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE6(epoll_pwait, int, epfd, compat_size_t, sigsetsize) {long err; -compat_sigset_t csigmask; -sigset_t ksigmask, sigsaved; -/* * If the caller wants a certain signal mask to be set during the wait, * we apply it here. */ if (sigmask) { +compat_sigset_t csigmask; +sigset_t ksigmask; +if (sigsetsize !=sizeof (compat_sigset_t))return -EINVAL ;if (copy_from_user (&csigmask, sigmask,sizeof (csigmask)))return -EFAULT ;sigset_from_compat (&ksigmask, &csigmask); - sigsaved = current->blocked; + + current->saved_sigmask = current->blocked;set_current_blocked (&ksigmask); } err =sys_epoll_wait (epfd, events, maxevents, timeout); -/* * If we changed the signal mask, we need to restore the original one. * In case we've got a signal while waiting, we do not restore the
@@ -2033,12 +2031,10 @@ COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE6(epoll_pwait, int, epfd,* the way back to userspace, before the signal mask is restored. */ if (sigmask) { -if (err == -EINTR ) { -memcpy (¤t->saved_sigmask, &sigsaved, -sizeof (sigsaved)); +if (err == -EINTR )set_restore_sigmask (); - }else -set_current_blocked (&sigsaved); +else +__set_current_blocked (¤t->saved_sigmask); }return err;
Signature · 1 line
1.5.5.1
Al Viro
maintainerRe: [PATCH 2/2] signals: eventpoll: set ->saved_sigmask at the start
Quoted 12 lines · Oleg Nesterov
fs/eventpoll.c +1
-1+ current->saved_sigmask = current->blocked;set_current_blocked (&ksigmask); } error =sys_epoll_wait (epfd, events, maxevents, timeout); -/* * If we changed the signal mask, we need to restore the original one. * In case we've got a signal while waiting, we do not restore the @@ -1988,12 +1988,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(epoll_pwait, int, epfd, struct epoll_event __user *, events,* the way back to userspace, before the signal mask is restored. */
fs/eventpoll.c SYSCALL_DEFINE6(epoll_pwait, int, epfd, struct epoll_event __user *, events, · line 1994
Quoted 10 lines
fs/eventpoll.c +3
-5if (sigmask) { -if (error == -EINTR ) { -memcpy (¤t->saved_sigmask, &sigsaved, -sizeof (sigsaved)); +if (error == -EINTR )set_restore_sigmask (); - }else -set_current_blocked (&sigsaved); +else +__set_current_blocked (¤t->saved_sigmask);
I don't like that. If anything, we have
static inline void restore_saved_sigmask(void)
{
if (test_and_clear_restore_sigmask())
__set_current_blocked(¤t->saved_sigmask);
}
which means that the last part can be turned into
set_restore_sigmask();
if (error != -EINTR)
restore_saved_sigmask();and I'd pulled set_restore_sigmask() call next to setting the sucker.
Re: [PATCH 2/2] signals: eventpoll: set ->saved_sigmask at the start
Quoted 27 lines · Al Viro
Quoted 12 lines · Oleg Nesterov
fs/eventpoll.c +1
-1+ current->saved_sigmask = current->blocked;set_current_blocked (&ksigmask); } error =sys_epoll_wait (epfd, events, maxevents, timeout); -/* * If we changed the signal mask, we need to restore the original one. * In case we've got a signal while waiting, we do not restore the @@ -1988,12 +1988,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(epoll_pwait, int, epfd, struct epoll_event __user *, events,* the way back to userspace, before the signal mask is restored. */ fs/eventpoll.c SYSCALL_DEFINE6(epoll_pwait, int, epfd, struct epoll_event __user *, events, · line 1994
Quoted 10 lines
fs/eventpoll.c +3
-5if (sigmask) { -if (error == -EINTR ) { -memcpy (¤t->saved_sigmask, &sigsaved, -sizeof (sigsaved)); +if (error == -EINTR )set_restore_sigmask (); - }else -set_current_blocked (&sigsaved); +else +__set_current_blocked (¤t->saved_sigmask);I don't like that. If anything, we have
static inline voidrestore_saved_sigmask(void)
Quoted 8 lines
{
if (test_and_clear_restore_sigmask())
__set_current_blocked(¤t->saved_sigmask);
}
which means that the last part can be turned into
set_restore_sigmask();
if (error != -EINTR)
restore_saved_sigmask();set_restore_sigmask() does WARN_ON(!TIF_SIGPENDING).
Quoted 1 line
and I'd pulled
set_restore_sigmask()call next to setting the sucker.
Sorry, can't understand...
Anyway, I agree we can make this more clean. From 0/2
Perhaps it also makes sense to add the new helper which does copy_from_user + set saved_sigmask + set_current_blocked() ?
and perhaps we can add another helper which does set_restore_sigmask() _or_ set_current_blocked(saved_sigmask), this can simplify more callers. I think we can do this on top of this change.
Or I misunderstood and you dislike the very fact we rely on the already initialized ->saved_sigmask ?
Oleg.
Re: [PATCH 2/2] signals: eventpoll: set ->saved_sigmask at the start
Quoted 22 lines · Oleg Nesterov
Quoted 11 lines · Al Viro
fs/eventpoll.c SYSCALL_DEFINE6(epoll_pwait, int, epfd, struct epoll_event __user *, events, · line 1994
Quoted 6 lines · Oleg Nesterov
fs/eventpoll.c +3
-2+if (error == -EINTR )set_restore_sigmask (); - }else -set_current_blocked (&sigsaved); +else +__set_current_blocked (¤t->saved_sigmask);I don't like that. If anything, we have
static inline voidrestore_saved_sigmask(void)Quoted 8 lines
{ if (test_and_clear_restore_sigmask()) __set_current_blocked(¤t->saved_sigmask); } which means that the last part can be turned into set_restore_sigmask(); if (error != -EINTR) restore_saved_sigmask();
Quoted 1 line
set_restore_sigmask()doesWARN_ON(!TIF_SIGPENDING).
But if we remove this WARN_ON() we can probably change set_restore_sigmask() to set TS_RESTORE_SIGMASK and do saved_mask = blocked.
Perhaps it can even acccept "sigset_t *newmask" and do set_current_blocked().
Then we can move it up and change the code above to simply as you suggested. But imho this needs a separate change.
Oleg.
Re: [PATCH 2/2] signals: eventpoll: set ->saved_sigmask at the start
Quoted 7 lines · Oleg Nesterov
But if we remove this
WARN_ON()we can probably changeset_restore_sigmask()to setTS_RESTORE_SIGMASKand dosaved_mask= blocked.Perhaps it can even acccept "
sigset_t*newmask" and doset_current_blocked().
So, Al, what do you think if we do something like
--- x/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ x/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -247,7 +247,6 @@ static inline void set_restore_sigmask(v
{
struct thread_info *ti = current_thread_info();
ti->status |= TS_RESTORE_SIGMASK;
- WARN_ON(!test_bit(TIF_SIGPENDING, (unsigned long *)&ti->flags));
}
static inline void clear_restore_sigmask(void)
{
--- x/include/linux/signal.h
+++ x/include/linux/signal.h
@@ -249,6 +249,13 @@ extern void __set_current_blocked(const
extern int show_unhandled_signals;
extern int sigsuspend(sigset_t *);
+static inline set_restore_xxx(sigset_t *mask)
+{
+ set_restore_sigmask();
+ current->saved_sigmask = current->blocked;
+ set_current_blocked(mask);
+}
+
struct sigaction {
#ifndef __ARCH_HAS_IRIX_SIGACTION
__sighandler_t sa_handler;Then sys_epoll_pwait() (and other users) can simply do
SYSCALL_DEFINE6(epoll_pwait, int, epfd, struct epoll_event __user *, events,
int, maxevents, int, timeout, const sigset_t __user *, sigmask,
size_t, sigsetsize)
{
int error;
/*
* If the caller wants a certain signal mask to be set during the wait,
* we apply it here.
*/
if (sigmask) {
sigset_t ksigmask;
if (sigsetsize != sizeof(sigset_t))
return -EINVAL;
if (copy_from_user(&ksigmask, sigmask, sizeof(ksigmask)))
return -EFAULT;
set_restore_xxx(&ksigmask);
}
error = sys_epoll_wait(epfd, events, maxevents, timeout);
if (error != -EINTR)
restore_saved_sigmask();
return error;
}Hmm... and when I re-read your original email I am starting to think that perhaps you proposed exactly this...
But I still think it would be better to do this change on top of the cleanups I sent (fs/compat.c and fs/select.c should be updated too).
But, perhaps, it also makes sense to add
void restore_saved_sigmask_if(bool cond)
{
if (cond)
restore_saved_sigmask();
else
WARN_ON(TS_RESTORE_SIGMASK && !TIF_SIGPENDING);
}so that epoll_pwait() could do
restore_saved_sigmask_if(error != -EINTR);
What do you think?
Oleg.