iptables: allow service names in [DS]NAT targets

PATCH New Phil Oester 1 participant 1 message Jul 31, 2013 netfilter

Share & tools

Phil Oester

author

2013-07-31 16:48 UTC #0 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/1 iptables: allow service names in [DS]NAT targets

As reported by Alexander Hoogerhuis, the [DS]NAT targets do not allow use of service names in the --to argument. The same problem was fixed in the REDIRECT target in commit 84d758b3 ("extensions: REDIRECT: fix --to-ports parser"). Use a similar fix here.

This closes bugzilla #514.

Phil

Signed-off-by Phil Oester <[email protected]>

---
v2: also handle IPv6 [DS]NAT targets
v3: update manpage to reflect when this option becomes available + limitation on range

extensions/libip6t_DNAT.c +18 ~~-24~~

index eaa6bf1..f842e40 100644
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static const struct xt_option_entry DNAT_opts[] = {
 static void
 parse_to(const char *orig_arg, int portok, struct nf_nat_range *range)
 {
-	char *arg, *start, *end = NULL, *colon = NULL, *dash, *error;
+	char *arg, *start, *end = "", *colon = NULL, *dash;
 	const struct in6_addr *ip;
 
 	arg = strdup(orig_arg);

@@ -60,8 +60,7 @@ parse_to(const char *orig_arg, int portok, struct nf_nat_range *range)
 		colon = strchr(arg, ':');
 		if (colon && strchr(colon+1, ':'))
 			colon = NULL;
-	}
-	else {
+	} else {
 		start++;
 		end = strchr(start, ']');
 		if (end == NULL)

@@ -73,7 +72,7 @@ parse_to(const char *orig_arg, int portok, struct nf_nat_range *range)
 	}
 
 	if (colon) {
-		int port;
+		unsigned int port, maxport;
 
 		if (!portok)
 			xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,

@@ -81,34 +80,29 @@ parse_to(const char *orig_arg, int portok, struct nf_nat_range *range)
 
 		range->flags |= NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_SPECIFIED;
 
-		port = atoi(colon+1);
-		if (port <= 0 || port > 65535)
-			xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
-				   "Port `%s' not valid\n", colon+1);
-
-		error = strchr(colon+1, ':');
-		if (error)
-			xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
-				   "Invalid port:port syntax - use dash\n");
+		if (!xtables_strtoui(colon + 1, &end, &port, 0, UINT16_MAX) &&
+		    (port = xtables_service_to_port(colon + 1, NULL)) == (unsigned)-1)
+			xtables_param_act(XTF_BAD_VALUE, "DNAT", "--to", colon);
 
-		dash = strchr(colon, '-');
-		if (!dash) {
+		switch (*end) {
+		case '\0':
 			range->min_proto.tcp.port
 				= range->max_proto.tcp.port
 				= htons(port);
-		} else {
-			int maxport;
+			break;
+		case '-':
+			if (!xtables_strtoui(end + 1, NULL, &maxport, 0, UINT16_MAX) &&
+			    (maxport = xtables_service_to_port(end + 1, NULL)) == (unsigned)-1)
+				xtables_param_act(XTF_BAD_VALUE, "DNAT", "--to", colon);
 
-			maxport = atoi(dash + 1);
-			if (maxport <= 0 || maxport > 65535)
-				xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
-					   "Port `%s' not valid\n", dash+1);
 			if (maxport < port)
-				/* People are stupid. */
-				xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
-					   "Port range `%s' funky\n", colon+1);
+				xtables_param_act(XTF_BAD_VALUE, "DNAT", "--to", colon);
+
 			range->min_proto.tcp.port = htons(port);
 			range->max_proto.tcp.port = htons(maxport);
+			break;
+		default:
+			xtables_param_act(XTF_BAD_VALUE, "DNAT", "--to", colon);
 		}
 		/* Starts with colon or [] colon? No IP info...*/
 		if (colon == arg || colon == arg+2) {

extensions/libip6t_SNAT.c +18 ~~-24~~

74 lines not on this page · raw message

extensions/libipt_DNAT.c +18 ~~-22~~

index ff18799..e452cfc 100644
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static struct xt_entry_target *
 parse_to(const char *orig_arg, int portok, struct ipt_natinfo *info)
 {
 	struct nf_nat_ipv4_range range;
-	char *arg, *colon, *dash, *error;
+	char *arg, *colon, *dash;
 	const struct in_addr *ip;
 
 	arg = strdup(orig_arg);

@@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ parse_to(const char *orig_arg, int portok, struct ipt_natinfo *info)
 	colon = strchr(arg, ':');
 
 	if (colon) {
-		int port;
+		char *end = "";
+		unsigned int port, maxport;
 
 		if (!portok)
 			xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,

@@ -85,34 +86,29 @@ parse_to(const char *orig_arg, int portok, struct ipt_natinfo *info)
 
 		range.flags |= NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_SPECIFIED;
 
-		port = atoi(colon+1);
-		if (port <= 0 || port > 65535)
-			xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
-				   "Port `%s' not valid\n", colon+1);
-
-		error = strchr(colon+1, ':');
-		if (error)
-			xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
-				   "Invalid port:port syntax - use dash\n");
+		if (!xtables_strtoui(colon + 1, &end, &port, 0, UINT16_MAX) &&
+		    (port = xtables_service_to_port(colon + 1, NULL)) == (unsigned)-1)
+			xtables_param_act(XTF_BAD_VALUE, "DNAT", "--to", arg);
 
-		dash = strchr(colon, '-');
-		if (!dash) {
+		switch (*end) {
+		case '\0':
 			range.min.tcp.port
 				= range.max.tcp.port
 				= htons(port);
-		} else {
-			int maxport;
+			break;
+		case '-':
+			if (!xtables_strtoui(end + 1, NULL, &maxport, 0, UINT16_MAX) &&
+			    (maxport = xtables_service_to_port(end + 1, NULL)) == (unsigned)-1)
+				xtables_param_act(XTF_BAD_VALUE, "DNAT", "--to", arg);
 
-			maxport = atoi(dash + 1);
-			if (maxport <= 0 || maxport > 65535)
-				xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
-					   "Port `%s' not valid\n", dash+1);
 			if (maxport < port)
-				/* People are stupid. */
-				xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
-					   "Port range `%s' funky\n", colon+1);
+				xtables_param_act(XTF_BAD_VALUE, "DNAT", "--to", arg);
+
 			range.min.tcp.port = htons(port);
 			range.max.tcp.port = htons(maxport);
+			break;
+		default:
+			xtables_param_act(XTF_BAD_VALUE, "DNAT", "--to", arg);
 		}
 		/* Starts with a colon? No IP info...*/
 		if (colon == arg) {

extensions/libipt_SNAT.c +18 ~~-22~~

index 1a24f3d..01be677 100644
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static struct xt_entry_target *
 parse_to(const char *orig_arg, int portok, struct ipt_natinfo *info)
 {
 	struct nf_nat_ipv4_range range;
-	char *arg, *colon, *dash, *error;
+	char *arg, *colon, *dash;
 	const struct in_addr *ip;
 
 	arg = strdup(orig_arg);

@@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ parse_to(const char *orig_arg, int portok, struct ipt_natinfo *info)
 	colon = strchr(arg, ':');
 
 	if (colon) {
-		int port;
+		char *end = "";
+		unsigned int port, maxport;
 
 		if (!portok)
 			xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,

@@ -85,34 +86,29 @@ parse_to(const char *orig_arg, int portok, struct ipt_natinfo *info)
 
 		range.flags |= NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_SPECIFIED;
 
-		port = atoi(colon+1);
-		if (port <= 0 || port > 65535)
-			xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
-				   "Port `%s' not valid\n", colon+1);
-
-		error = strchr(colon+1, ':');
-		if (error)
-			xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
-				   "Invalid port:port syntax - use dash\n");
+		if (!xtables_strtoui(colon + 1, &end, &port, 0, UINT16_MAX) &&
+		    (port = xtables_service_to_port(colon + 1, NULL)) == (unsigned)-1)
+			xtables_param_act(XTF_BAD_VALUE, "SNAT", "--to", arg);
 
-		dash = strchr(colon, '-');
-		if (!dash) {
+		switch (*end) {
+		case '\0':
 			range.min.tcp.port
 				= range.max.tcp.port
 				= htons(port);
-		} else {
-			int maxport;
+			break;
+		case '-':
+			if (!xtables_strtoui(end + 1, NULL, &maxport, 0, UINT16_MAX) &&
+			    (maxport = xtables_service_to_port(end + 1, NULL)) == (unsigned)-1)
+				xtables_param_act(XTF_BAD_VALUE, "SNAT", "--to", arg);
 
-			maxport = atoi(dash + 1);
-			if (maxport <= 0 || maxport > 65535)
-				xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
-					   "Port `%s' not valid\n", dash+1);
 			if (maxport < port)
-				/* People are stupid. */
-				xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
-					   "Port range `%s' funky\n", colon+1);
+				xtables_param_act(XTF_BAD_VALUE, "SNAT", "--to", arg);
+
 			range.min.tcp.port = htons(port);
 			range.max.tcp.port = htons(maxport);
+			break;
+		default:
+			xtables_param_act(XTF_BAD_VALUE, "SNAT", "--to", arg);
 		}
 		/* Starts with a colon? No IP info...*/
 		if (colon == arg) {

extensions/libxt_DNAT.man +5 -2

index 225274f..70e5d9a 100644
@@ -12,12 +12,15 @@ following options:
 .TP
 \fB\-\-to\-destination\fP [\fIipaddr\fP[\fB\-\fP\fIipaddr\fP]][\fB:\fP\fIport\fP[\fB\-\fP\fIport\fP]]
 which can specify a single new destination IP address, an inclusive
-range of IP addresses. Optionally a port range,
+range of IP addresses. Optionally a port or port range,
 if the rule also specifies one of the following protocols:
 \fBtcp\fP, \fBudp\fP, \fBdccp\fP or \fBsctp\fP.
-If no port range is specified, then the destination port will never be
+If no port or port range is specified, then the destination port will never be
 modified. If no IP address is specified then only the destination port
 will be modified.
+Versions of iptables >= 1.4.20 accept service names for the port, however
+because service names can contain dashes, you cannot specify a port range if you
+use service names.
 In Kernels up to 2.6.10 you can add several \-\-to\-destination options. For
 those kernels, if you specify more than one destination address, either via an
 address range or multiple \-\-to\-destination options, a simple round-robin (one

extensions/libxt_SNAT.man +5 -2

index f0620a2..368ddc7 100644
@@ -12,13 +12,16 @@ following options:
 .TP
 \fB\-\-to\-source\fP [\fIipaddr\fP[\fB\-\fP\fIipaddr\fP]][\fB:\fP\fIport\fP[\fB\-\fP\fIport\fP]]
 which can specify a single new source IP address, an inclusive range
-of IP addresses. Optionally a port range,
+of IP addresses. Optionally a port or port range,
 if the rule also specifies one of the following protocols:
 \fBtcp\fP, \fBudp\fP, \fBdccp\fP or \fBsctp\fP.
-If no port range is specified, then source ports below 512 will be
+If no port or port range is specified, then source ports below 512 will be
 mapped to other ports below 512: those between 512 and 1023 inclusive
 will be mapped to ports below 1024, and other ports will be mapped to
 1024 or above. Where possible, no port alteration will occur.
+Versions of iptables >= 1.4.20 accept service names for the port, however
+because service names can contain dashes, you cannot specify a port range if you
+use service names.
 In Kernels up to 2.6.10, you can add several \-\-to\-source options. For those
 kernels, if you specify more than one source address, either via an address
 range or multiple \-\-to\-source options, a simple round-robin (one after another