Patch notification: 1 patch updated

Bad move.

----- Forwarded message from Patchwork <[email protected]> -----

Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:58:03 -0000
From: Patchwork <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [linux-media] Patch notification: 1 patch updated
Delivery-date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:58:09 +0100

Hello,

The following patch (submitted by you) has been updated in patchwork:

* linux-media: [31/51] DMA-API: media: omap3isp: use dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent()
- http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/20178/
- for: Linux Media kernel patches
was: New
now: Accepted

This email is a notification only - you do not need to respond.

-

Patches submitted to [email protected] have the following possible states:

New: Patches not yet reviewed (typically new patches);

Under review: When it is expected that someone is reviewing it (typically,
the driver's author or maintainer). Unfortunately, patchwork doesn't have a field to indicate who is the driver maintainer. If in doubt about who is the driver maintainer please check the MAINTAINERS file or ask at the ML;

Superseded: when the same patch is sent twice, or a new version of the
same patch is sent, and the maintainer identified it, the first version is marked as such. It is also used when a patch was superseeded by a git pull request.

Obsoleted: patch doesn't apply anymore, because the modified code doesn't
exist anymore.

Changes requested: when someone requests changes at the patch;

Rejected: When the patch is wrong or doesn't apply. Most of the
time, 'rejected' and 'changes requested' means the same thing for the developer: he'll need to re-work on the patch.

RFC: patches marked as such and other patches that are also RFC, but the
patch author was not nice enough to mark them as such. That includes:
- patches sent by a driver's maintainer who send patches via git pull requests;
- patches with a very active community (typically from developers working with embedded devices), where lots of versions are needed for the driver maintainer and/or the community to be happy with.

Not Applicable: for patches that aren't meant to be applicable via
the media-tree.git.

Accepted: when some driver maintainer says that the patch will be applied

	  via his tree, or when everything is ok and it got applied
	  either at the main tree or via some other tree (fixes tree;
	  some other maintainer's tree - when it belongs to other subsystems,
	  etc);

If you think any status change is a mistake, please send an email to the ML.

-

This is an automated mail sent by the patchwork system at patchwork.linuxtv.org. To stop receiving these notifications, edit your mail settings at:
http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/mail/

----- End forwarded message -----

Hi Russell,

Wrong status indeed. I wasn't planning to apply the patch through my tree as it's part of a much larger series. Sorry for the noise.

Regards,

Laurent Pinchart