jffs2: unlock f->sem on error in jffs2_new_inode()
PATCH RESEND 1/1 jffs2: unlock f->sem on error in jffs2_new_inode()
Hi Andrew,
Could you please have a look at the following patch?
This patch fixes an obvious bug in jffs2. I have already sent it to mtd list, but Woodhouse hasn't been responsive.
Thanks.
===================
Quoted 1 line
From
1e5e695840fbb5b4a0583e20789fae76c6119d48Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wang Guoli <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:14:54 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] jffs2: unlock f->sem on error in jffs2_new_inode()
If jffs2_new_inode() succeeds, it returns with f->sem held, and the caller is responsible for releasing the lock. If it fails, it still returns with the lock held, but the caller won't release the lock, which will lead to deadlock.
Fix it by releasing the lock in jffs2_new_inode() on error.
--- fs/jffs2/fs.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
fs/jffs2/fs.c +6 -3
@@ -456,12 +456,14 @@ struct inode *jffs2_new_inode (struct inode *dir_i, umode_t mode, struct jffs2_rThe umask is only applied if there's no default ACL */ ret =jffs2_init_acl_pre (dir_i, inode, &mode);if (ret) { -make_bad_inode (inode); -iput (inode); -return ERR_PTR (ret); +mutex_unlock (&f->sem); +make_bad_inode (inode); +iput (inode); +return ERR_PTR (ret); } ret =jffs2_do_new_inode (c, f, mode, ri);if (ret) { +mutex_unlock (&f->sem);make_bad_inode (inode);iput (inode);return ERR_PTR (ret);
@@ -478,6 +480,7 @@ struct inode *jffs2_new_inode (struct inode *dir_i, umode_t mode, struct jffs2_r inode->i_size =0 ;if (insert_inode_locked (inode) <0 ) { +mutex_unlock (&f->sem);make_bad_inode (inode);iput (inode);return ERR_PTR (-EINVAL );
Signature · 1 line
1.8.4