dib0700 NEC scancode question
Hi Patrick,
a quick question regarding the dib0700 driver:
in ./media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c the RC RX packet is defined as:
struct dib0700_rc_response {
u8 report_id;
u8 data_state;
union {
u16 system16;
struct {
u8 not_system;
u8 system;
};
};
u8 data;
u8 not_data;
};The NEC protocol transmits in the order:
system
not_system
data
not_data
Does the dib0700 fw really reorder the bytes, or could the order of not_system and system in struct dib0700_rc_response have been accidentally reversed?
Note that the NEC extended keycode is later defined in dib0700_core.c as:
keycode = be16_to_cpu(poll_reply->system16) << 8 | poll_reply->data;
i.e.
keycode = poll_reply->not_system << 16 | poll_reply->system << 8 | poll_reply->data;
Which, if the order *is* reversed, would mean that the scancode that gets defined is in reality:
keycode = poll_reply->system << 16 | poll_reply->not_system << 8 | poll_reply->data;
Which is the same as the order used in drivers/media/rc/ir-nec-decoder.c.
(An order which I'm considering trying to correct, which is why I'm checking all the places where NEC scancodes are generated).
Signature · 1 line
David Härdeman
Quoted 5 lines · David Härdeman
Hi Patrick,
a quick question regarding the dib0700 driver:
in
./media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.cthe RC RX packet is defined as:
...
Quoted 1 line
The NEC protocol transmits in the order:
...
Quoted 3 lines
Does the dib0700 fw really reorder the bytes, or could the order of
not_systemand system in structdib0700_rc_responsehave been accidentally reversed?
...
Quoted 10 lines
Which, if the order *is* reversed, would mean that the scancode that gets defined is in reality:
keycode = poll_reply->system << 16 | poll_reply->not_system << 8 | poll_reply->data;Which is the same as the order used in
drivers/media/rc/ir-nec-decoder.c.(An order which I'm considering trying to correct, which is why I'm
s/correct/make sure it's consistent/
Signature · 1 line
David Härdeman
Hi David,
Quoted 6 lines · On Thursday 27 March 2014 22:40:41 David Härdeman wrote:
Quoted 5 lines · David Härdeman
Hi Patrick,
a quick question regarding the dib0700 driver:
in
./media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.cthe RC RX packet is defined as:
Quoted 8 lines
...
Quoted 1 line
The NEC protocol transmits in the order:
...
Quoted 3 lines
Does the dib0700 fw really reorder the bytes, or could the order of
not_systemand system in structdib0700_rc_responsehave been accidentally reversed?
It feels like a hundred years I haven't work on that. I'm not sure whether this knowledge can still be retrieved as of today or not. I would lie if I told you that I look the archives... and I can't want to do that (lying and looking).
However, I realize that your assumption might not be totally far-fetched. If you can find another IR-receiver just check whether the same remote control delivers swapped bytes or not (if I understood it correctly, that's your real question). Then you have you answer, haven't you?
Signature · 1 line
Patrick.
Quoted 23 lines · Patrick Boettcher
Hi David,
Quoted 6 lines · On Thursday 27 March 2014 22:40:41 David Härdeman wrote:
Quoted 5 lines · David Härdeman
Hi Patrick,
a quick question regarding the dib0700 driver:
in
./media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.cthe RC RX packet is defined as:Quoted 8 lines
...
Quoted 1 line
The NEC protocol transmits in the order:
...
Quoted 3 lines
Does the dib0700 fw really reorder the bytes, or could the order of
not_systemand system in structdib0700_rc_responsehave been accidentally reversed?It feels like a hundred years I haven't work on that. I'm not sure whether this knowledge can still be retrieved as of today or not. I would lie if I told you that I look the archives... and I can't want to do that (lying and looking).
Quoted 4 lines
However, I realize that your assumption might not be totally far-fetched. If you can find another IR-receiver just check whether the same remote control delivers swapped bytes or not (if I understood it correctly, that's your real question). Then you have you answer, haven't you?
If I had the hardware, yes :)
I don't, I just want to refactor some parts of the IR handling code across several drivers, which is why I came across this...I guess there are others who do have the hardware who will complain loudly if I try changing it and my assumptions turn out to be incorrect though...
Signature · 1 line
David Härdeman