ARM: perf: updates for 3.19
Hi Arnd, Olof, Russell,
Please can you pull the following ARM perf updates into arm-soc?
I usually send these via rmk's tree, but there's a bunch of CCI PMU rework in here which is then relied upon by other patches in the series, so it would be easiest to keep it all together.
These have been in -next for a few weeks, so please let me know when you've pulled and I'll drop my branch from there.
Cheers,
Will
--->8
The following changes since commit cac7f2429872d3733dc3f9915857b1691da2eb2f:
Linux 3.18-rc2 (2014-10-26 16:48:41 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git tags/arm-perf-3.19
for you to fetch changes up to af66abfe2ec8bd82211e9e4f036a64c902ff4cdb:
arm: perf: fold hotplug notifier into arm_pmu (2014-10-30 12:17:01 +0000)
----------------------------------------------------------------
This patch series takes us slightly further on the road to big.LITTLE support in perf. The main change enabling this is moving the CCI PMU driver away from the arm-pmu abstraction, allowing the arch code to focus specifically on support for CPU PMUs.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Rutland (10):
bus: cci: move away from arm_pmu framework
arm: perf: factor out callchain code
arm: perf: add missing pr_info newlines
arm: perf: make PMU probing data-driven
arm: perf: use IDR types for CPU PMUs
arm: perf: limit size of accounting data
arm: perf: kill get_hw_events()
arm: perf: fold percpu_pmu into pmu_hw_events
arm: perf: dynamically allocate cpu hardware data
arm: perf: fold hotplug notifier into arm_pmu
Will Deacon (1):
ARM: perf: use pr_* instead of printk
chai wen (1):
ARM: perf: remove useless return and check of idx in counter handling
arch/arm/include/asm/perf_event.h | 2 +- arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h | 36 ++- arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 2 +- arch/arm/kernel/perf_callchain.c | 136 +++++++++ arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 162 ++--------- arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c | 181 ++++++------ arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c | 12 +- arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c | 72 +++-- arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_xscale.c | 20 +- drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 552 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 10 files changed, 772 insertions(+), 403 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/perf_callchain.c
Quoted 10 lines · Will Deacon
Hi Arnd, Olof, Russell,
Please can you pull the following ARM perf updates into arm-soc?
I usually send these via rmk's tree, but there's a bunch of CCI PMU rework in here which is then relied upon by other patches in the series, so it would be easiest to keep it all together.
These have been in -next for a few weeks, so please let me know when you've pulled and I'll drop my branch from there.
Ping? Anything else you need from me to get this into arm-soc?
Will
Quoted 51 lines
--->8
The following changes since commit
cac7f2429872d3733dc3f9915857b1691da2eb2f:Linux 3.18-rc2 (2014-10-26 16:48:41 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.gittags/arm-perf-3.19for you to fetch changes up to
af66abfe2ec8bd82211e9e4f036a64c902ff4cdb:arm: perf: fold hotplug notifier into
arm_pmu(2014-10-30 12:17:01 +0000)----------------------------------------------------------------
This patch series takes us slightly further on the road to big.LITTLE support in perf. The main change enabling this is moving the CCI PMU driver away from the arm-pmu abstraction, allowing the arch code to focus specifically on support for CPU PMUs.----------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Rutland (10):
bus: cci: move away fromarm_pmuframework
arm: perf: factor out callchain code
arm: perf: add missingpr_infonewlines
arm: perf: make PMU probing data-driven
arm: perf: use IDR types for CPU PMUs
arm: perf: limit size of accounting data
arm: perf: killget_hw_events()
arm: perf: foldpercpu_pmuintopmu_hw_events
arm: perf: dynamically allocate cpu hardware data
arm: perf: fold hotplug notifier intoarm_pmuWill Deacon (1):
ARM: perf: use pr_* instead of printkchai wen (1):
ARM: perf: remove useless return and check of idx in counter handlingarch/arm/include/asm/perf_event.h | 2 +- arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h | 36 ++- arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 2 +- arch/arm/kernel/perf_callchain.c | 136 +++++++++ arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 162 ++--------- arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c | 181 ++++++------ arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c | 12 +- arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c | 72 +++-- arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_xscale.c | 20 +- drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 552 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 10 files changed, 772 insertions(+), 403 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/perf_callchain.c
Quoted 5 lines · On Thursday 20 November 2014 10:56:14 Will Deacon wrote:
Quoted 4 lines · Will Deacon
Hi Arnd, Olof, Russell,
Please can you pull the following ARM perf updates into arm-soc?
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 6 lines
I usually send these via rmk's tree, but there's a bunch of CCI PMU rework in here which is then relied upon by other patches in the series, so it would be easiest to keep it all together.
These have been in -next for a few weeks, so please let me know when you've pulled and I'll drop my branch from there.
Ping? Anything else you need from me to get this into arm-soc?
I'm still working through the backlog, it's on the list.
Thanks for following up.
Arnd
Quoted 11 lines · Will Deacon
Hi Arnd, Olof, Russell,
Please can you pull the following ARM perf updates into arm-soc?
I usually send these via rmk's tree, but there's a bunch of CCI PMU rework in here which is then relied upon by other patches in the series, so it would be easiest to keep it all together.
These have been in -next for a few weeks, so please let me know when you've pulled and I'll drop my branch from there.
Pulled into next/drivers. Russell, please yell if you have any objections.
Arnd
Quoted 9 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 8 lines · Will Deacon
Hi Arnd, Olof, Russell,
Please can you pull the following ARM perf updates into arm-soc?
I usually send these via rmk's tree, but there's a bunch of CCI PMU rework in here which is then relied upon by other patches in the series, so it would be easiest to keep it all together.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
These have been in -next for a few weeks, so please let me know when you've pulled and I'll drop my branch from there.
Pulled into next/drivers. Russell, please yell if you have any objections.
Thanks Arnd, I'll drop my branch from -next. Sorry for pestering!
Will