Question about prio_changed_dl()
Hi,
when playing with the __dl_{add,sub}_ac() stuff recently posted by Juri, I found something that looks strange in prio_changed_dl():
static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
int oldprio)
{
if (task_on_rq_queued(p) || rq->curr == p) {
[...]
} else
switched_to_dl(rq, p);
}
but switched_to_dl() does:
static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && rq->curr != p) {
[...]
}
}so, prio_changed_dl() invokes switched_to_dl() if task_on_rq_queued() is false, but in this case switched_to_dl() does nothing... Am I missing something, or the
} else switched_to_dl(rq, p);
is useless?
(BTW, it seems to me that switched_to_dl() is never invoked, for some reason...)
Thanks,
Luca
If you wonder how this is related to __dl_{add,sub}_ac(), I am going to write an email about it in a short time :)
Peter Zijlstra
maintainerQuoted 21 lines · luca abeni
Hi,
when playing with the __dl_{add,sub}_ac() stuff recently posted by Juri, I found something that looks strange in
prio_changed_dl():static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq, struct
task_struct*p,
int oldprio){ if (task_on_rq_queued(p) || rq->curr == p) { [...] } else switched_to_dl(rq, p); } but switched_to_dl() does: static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) { if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && rq->curr != p) { [...] } }
Quoted 6 lines
so,
prio_changed_dl()invokesswitched_to_dl()iftask_on_rq_queued()is false, but in this caseswitched_to_dl()does nothing... Am I missing something, or the} else switched_to_dl(rq, p);is useless?
Agreed, see below.
Quoted 2 lines
(BTW, it seems to me that
switched_to_dl()is never invoked, for some reason...)
Hmm, it should be invoked if you do sched_setattr() to get SCHED_DEADLINE.
---
Subject: sched/deadline: Remove superfluous call to switched_to_dl()
if (A || B) {
} else if (A && !B) {
}If A we'll take the first branch, if !A we will not satisfy the second. Therefore the second branch will never be taken.
--- kernel/sched/deadline.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
kernel/sched/deadline.c +1 -2
@@ -1768,8 +1768,7 @@ static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,*/ resched_curr (rq);#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ - }else -switched_to_dl (rq, p); + } }const struct sched_class dl_sched_class = {
Juri Lelli
Acked-byQuoted 46 lines · Peter Zijlstra
Quoted 21 lines · luca abeni
Hi,
when playing with the __dl_{add,sub}_ac() stuff recently posted by Juri, I found something that looks strange in
prio_changed_dl():static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq, struct
task_struct*p,
int oldprio){ if (task_on_rq_queued(p) || rq->curr == p) { [...] } else switched_to_dl(rq, p); } but switched_to_dl() does: static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) { if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && rq->curr != p) { [...] } }Quoted 6 lines
so,
prio_changed_dl()invokesswitched_to_dl()iftask_on_rq_queued()is false, but in this caseswitched_to_dl()does nothing... Am I missing something, or the} else switched_to_dl(rq, p);is useless?
Agreed, see below.
Quoted 2 lines
(BTW, it seems to me that
switched_to_dl()is never invoked, for some reason...)Hmm, it should be invoked if you do
sched_setattr()to getSCHED_DEADLINE.---
Subject: sched/deadline: Remove superfluous call toswitched_to_dl()if (A || B) { } else if (A && !B) { }
Quoted 6 lines
If A we'll take the first branch, if !A we will not satisfy the second. Therefore the second branch will never be taken.
Cc Juri Lelli <[email protected]>Reported-by luca abeni <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Indeed!
Thanks,
- Juri
Hi Peter,
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:01:49 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
so,
prio_changed_dl()invokesswitched_to_dl()iftask_on_rq_queued()is false, but in this caseswitched_to_dl()does nothing... Am I missing something, or the} else switched_to_dl(rq, p);is useless?
Quoted 7 lines
Agreed, see below.
Quoted 2 lines
(BTW, it seems to me that
switched_to_dl()is never invoked, for some reason...)Hmm, it should be invoked if you do
sched_setattr()to getSCHED_DEADLINE.
Sorry, that was me being confused...
It is prio_changed_dl() that is not invoked when the deadline parameters are changed (I am testing a change to fix this - it actually is included in the "Move the remaining __dl_{sub,add}_ac() calls from core.c to deadline.c" patch I posted on Monday; I am going to extract it in a separate patch).switched_to_dl() is correctly invoked.
Quoted 3 lines
---
Subject: sched/deadline: Remove superfluous call toswitched_to_dl()
This is what I was thinking about, yes :)
Thanks,
Luca
Quoted 33 lines
if (A || B) { } else if (A && !B) { }If A we'll take the first branch, if !A we will not satisfy the second. Therefore the second branch will never be taken.
Cc Juri Lelli <[email protected]>Reported-by luca abeni <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>--- kernel/sched/deadline.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)kernel/sched/deadline.c +0
-0@@ -1768,8 +1768,7 @@ static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq,struct
task_struct*p, */kernel/sched/deadline.c +1
-2resched_curr (rq);#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ - }else -switched_to_dl (rq, p); + } }const struct sched_class dl_sched_class = {
Peter Zijlstra
maintainerQuoted 6 lines · luca abeni
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
(BTW, it seems to me that
switched_to_dl()is never invoked, for some reason...)Hmm, it should be invoked if you do
sched_setattr()to getSCHED_DEADLINE.
Quoted 6 lines
Sorry, that was me being confused...
It isprio_changed_dl()that is not invoked when the deadline parameters are changed (I am testing a change to fix this - it actually is included in the "Move the remaining __dl_{sub,add}_ac() calls fromcore.ctodeadline.c" patch I posted on Monday; I am going to extract it in a separate patch).
Ah ok. So the idea was that the || dl_task() part would ensure ->prio_changed() would always be called.
I'll await your patch.
Quoted 15 lines · On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:52:02 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 6 lines · luca abeni
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
(BTW, it seems to me that
switched_to_dl()is never invoked, for some reason...)Hmm, it should be invoked if you do
sched_setattr()to getSCHED_DEADLINE.Quoted 6 lines
Sorry, that was me being confused...
It isprio_changed_dl()that is not invoked when the deadline parameters are changed (I am testing a change to fix this - it actually is included in the "Move the remaining __dl_{sub,add}_ac() calls fromcore.ctodeadline.c" patch I posted on Monday; I am going to extract it in a separate patch).
Quoted 6 lines
Ah ok. So the idea was that the ||
dl_task()part would ensure ->prio_changed() would always be called.I'll await your patch.
From
5a0bde5332bc1cc5701b2d9799f6ec197c1572ccMon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Luca Abeni <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:56:24 +0100
Subject: sched/core: fix __sched_setscheduler() to properly invoke prio_changed_dl()
Currently, prio_changed_dl() is not called when __sched_setscheduler() changes the parameters of a SCHED_DEADLINE task. This happens because when changing parameters deadline tasks do not change their priority, so new_effective_prio == oldprio.
The issue is fixed by explicitly checking if the task is a deadline task.
--- kernel/sched/core.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
kernel/sched/core.c +2 -0
@@ -4079,6 +4079,8 @@ change: new_effective_prio =rt_mutex_get_effective_prio (p, newprio);if (new_effective_prio == oldprio) {__setscheduler_params (p, attr); +if (p->sched_class == &dl_sched_class) + p->sched_class->prio_changed (rq, p, oldprio);task_rq_unlock (rq, p, &flags);return 0 ; }
Signature · 1 line
2.5.0
tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
merge bot[tip:sched/core] sched/deadline: Remove superfluous call to switched_to_dl()
In reply to Peter Zijlstrasched/deadline: Remove superfluous call to switched_to_dl()
Commit-ID: 801ccdbf018ca5dbd478756ece55cd6c7726ed5b Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/801ccdbf018ca5dbd478756ece55cd6c7726ed5b Author: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:01:49 +0100 Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> CommitDate: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 09:53:11 +0100
sched/deadline: Remove superfluous call to switched_to_dl()
if (A || B) {
} else if (A && !B) {
}If A we'll take the first branch, if !A we will not satisfy the second. Therefore the second branch will never be taken.
--- kernel/sched/deadline.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
kernel/sched/deadline.c +1 -2
@@ -1772,8 +1772,7 @@ static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,*/ resched_curr (rq);#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ - }else -switched_to_dl (rq, p); + } }const struct sched_class dl_sched_class = {
Quoted 18 lines · luca abeni
Subject: sched/core: fix
__sched_setscheduler()to properly invokeprio_changed_dl()Currently,
prio_changed_dl()is not called when__sched_setscheduler()changes the parameters of aSCHED_DEADLINEtask. This happens because when changing parameters deadline tasks do not change their priority, sonew_effective_prio== oldprio.
The issue is fixed by explicitly checking if the task is a deadline task.Signed-off-by Luca Abeni <[email protected]>--- kernel/sched/core.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)kernel/sched/core.c +0
-0
kernel/sched/core.c change: · line 4086
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/sched/core.c +2
-0@@ -4079,6 +4079,8 @@ change: new_effective_prio =rt_mutex_get_effective_prio (p, newprio);if (new_effective_prio == oldprio) {__setscheduler_params (p, attr); +if (p->sched_class == &dl_sched_class) + p->sched_class->prio_changed (rq, p, oldprio);task_rq_unlock (rq, p, &flags);return 0 ; }
That code no longer exists like that.
Can you see if the below patch (which caused that) also fixes your problem?
---
commit ff77e468535987b3d21b7bd4da15608ea3ce7d0b
Author: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Date: Mon Jan 18 15:27:07 2016 +0100
sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler()
Andrea Parri reported:
> I found that the following scenario (with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not > handled correctly:
>
> T1 (prio = 20)
> lock(rtmutex);
>
> T2 (prio = 20)
> blocks on rtmutex (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq)
>
> T1 (prio = 20)
> sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0)
> [new_effective_prio == oldprio]
> T1 prio = 20 (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq)
>
> The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., rt_se_boosted()); > in particular, if we continue with
>
> T1 (prio = 20)
> unlock(rtmutex)
> wakeup(T2)
> adjust_prio(T1)
> [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)]
> dequeue(T1)
> rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1)
> ...
> T1 prio = 0
>
> then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state. >
> The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note > that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion" >
> WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted)
>
> from dec_rt_group() may trigger.
So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(), which would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path we fail to do so.
So this was introduced at around v3.14, by:
c365c292d059 ("sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()")
which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy.
Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling the on_rt_rq() state from being on the list.
In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE, introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these cases to preserve other invariants.
Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch).
include/linux/sched.h +2 -0
@@ -1293,6 +1293,8 @@ struct sched_rt_entity {unsigned long timeout;unsigned long watchdog_stamp;unsigned int time_slice; +unsigned short on_rq; +unsigned short on_list;struct sched_rt_entity *back;#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
kernel/sched/core.c +22 -17
@@ -2221,6 +2221,10 @@ static void __sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)__dl_clear_params (p);INIT_LIST_HEAD (&p->rt.run_list); + p->rt.timeout =0 ; + p->rt.time_slice = sched_rr_timeslice; + p->rt.on_rq =0 ; + p->rt.on_list =0 ;#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS INIT_HLIST_HEAD (&p->preempt_notifiers);
@@ -3531,7 +3535,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(default_wake_function);*/ void rt_mutex_setprio (struct task_struct *p,int prio) { -int oldprio, queued, running, enqueue_flag =ENQUEUE_RESTORE ; +int oldprio, queued, running, queue_flag =DEQUEUE_SAVE |DEQUEUE_MOVE ;struct rq *rq;const struct sched_class *prev_class;
@@ -3559,11 +3563,15 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)trace_sched_pi_setprio (p, prio); oldprio = p->prio; + +if (oldprio == prio) + queue_flag &= ~DEQUEUE_MOVE ; + prev_class = p->sched_class; queued =task_on_rq_queued (p); running =task_current (rq, p);if (queued) -dequeue_task (rq, p,DEQUEUE_SAVE ); +dequeue_task (rq, p, queue_flag);if (running)put_prev_task (rq, p);
@@ -3581,7 +3589,7 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)if (!dl_prio (p->normal_prio) || (pi_task &&dl_entity_preempt (&pi_task->dl, &p->dl))) { p->dl.dl_boosted =1 ; - enqueue_flag |=ENQUEUE_REPLENISH ; + queue_flag |=ENQUEUE_REPLENISH ; }else p->dl.dl_boosted =0 ; p->sched_class = &dl_sched_class;
@@ -3589,7 +3597,7 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)if (dl_prio (oldprio)) p->dl.dl_boosted =0 ;if (oldprio < prio) - enqueue_flag |=ENQUEUE_HEAD ; + queue_flag |=ENQUEUE_HEAD ; p->sched_class = &rt_sched_class; }else {if (dl_prio (oldprio))
@@ -3604,7 +3612,7 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)if (running) p->sched_class->set_curr_task (rq);if (queued) -enqueue_task (rq, p, enqueue_flag); +enqueue_task (rq, p, queue_flag);check_class_changed (rq, p, prev_class, oldprio); out_unlock:
@@ -3960,6 +3968,7 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,const struct sched_class *prev_class;struct rq *rq;int reset_on_fork; +int queue_flags =DEQUEUE_SAVE |DEQUEUE_MOVE ;/* may grab non-irq protected spin_locks */ BUG_ON (in_interrupt ());
@@ -4142,17 +4151,14 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,* itself. */ new_effective_prio =rt_mutex_get_effective_prio (p, newprio); -if (new_effective_prio == oldprio) { -__setscheduler_params (p, attr); -task_rq_unlock (rq, p, &flags); -return 0 ; - } +if (new_effective_prio == oldprio) + queue_flags &= ~DEQUEUE_MOVE ; } queued =task_on_rq_queued (p); running =task_current (rq, p);if (queued) -dequeue_task (rq, p,DEQUEUE_SAVE ); +dequeue_task (rq, p, queue_flags);if (running)put_prev_task (rq, p);
@@ -4162,15 +4168,14 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,if (running) p->sched_class->set_curr_task (rq);if (queued) { -int enqueue_flags =ENQUEUE_RESTORE ;/* * We enqueue to tail when the priority of a task is * increased (user space view). */ -if (oldprio <= p->prio) - enqueue_flags |=ENQUEUE_HEAD ; +if (oldprio < p->prio) + queue_flags |=ENQUEUE_HEAD ; -enqueue_task (rq, p, enqueue_flags); +enqueue_task (rq, p, queue_flags); }check_class_changed (rq, p, prev_class, oldprio);
@@ -7958,7 +7963,7 @@ void sched_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk) queued =task_on_rq_queued (tsk);if (queued) -dequeue_task (rq, tsk,DEQUEUE_SAVE ); +dequeue_task (rq, tsk,DEQUEUE_SAVE |DEQUEUE_MOVE );if (unlikely (running))put_prev_task (rq, tsk);
@@ -7982,7 +7987,7 @@ void sched_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk)if (unlikely (running)) tsk->sched_class->set_curr_task (rq);if (queued) -enqueue_task (rq, tsk,ENQUEUE_RESTORE ); +enqueue_task (rq, tsk,ENQUEUE_RESTORE |ENQUEUE_MOVE );task_rq_unlock (rq, tsk, &flags); }
kernel/sched/rt.c +60 -26
174 lines not on this page · raw message
kernel/sched/sched.h +29 -7
@@ -1130,18 +1130,40 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)extern const int sched_prio_to_weight[40 ];extern const u32 sched_prio_to_wmult[40 ]; +/* +* {de,en}queue flags: +* +* DEQUEUE_SLEEP - task is no longer runnable +* ENQUEUE_WAKEUP - task just became runnable +* +* SAVE/RESTORE - an otherwise spurious dequeue/enqueue, done to ensure tasks +* are in a known state which allows modification. Such pairs +* should preserve as much state as possible. +* +* MOVE - paired with SAVE/RESTORE, explicitly does not preserve the location +* in the runqueue. +* +* ENQUEUE_HEAD - place at front of runqueue (tail if not specified) +* ENQUEUE_REPLENISH - CBS (replenish runtime and postpone deadline) +* ENQUEUE_WAKING - sched_class::task_waking was called +* +*/ + +#define DEQUEUE_SLEEP 0x01 +#define DEQUEUE_SAVE 0x02/* matches ENQUEUE_RESTORE */ +#define DEQUEUE_MOVE 0x04/* matches ENQUEUE_MOVE */ +#define ENQUEUE_WAKEUP 0x01 -#define ENQUEUE_HEAD 0x02 +#define ENQUEUE_RESTORE 0x02 +#define ENQUEUE_MOVE 0x04 + +#define ENQUEUE_HEAD 0x08 +#define ENQUEUE_REPLENISH 0x10#ifdef CONFIG_SMP -#define ENQUEUE_WAKING 0x04/* sched_class::task_waking was called */ +#define ENQUEUE_WAKING 0x20#else #define ENQUEUE_WAKING 0x00#endif -#define ENQUEUE_REPLENISH 0x08 -#define ENQUEUE_RESTORE 0x10 - -#define DEQUEUE_SLEEP 0x01 -#define DEQUEUE_SAVE 0x02#define RETRY_TASK ((void *)-1UL)
Quoted 14 lines · On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 20:02:58 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 13 lines · luca abeni
Subject: sched/core: fix
__sched_setscheduler()to properly invokeprio_changed_dl()Currently,
prio_changed_dl()is not called when__sched_setscheduler()changes the parameters of aSCHED_DEADLINEtask. This happens because when changing parameters deadline tasks do not change their priority, sonew_effective_prio== oldprio.
The issue is fixed by explicitly checking if the task is a deadline task.Signed-off-by Luca Abeni <[email protected]>--- kernel/sched/core.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Quoted 15 lines
kernel/sched/core.c change: · line 4086
Quoted 13 lines
kernel/sched/core.c +2
-0@@ -4079,6 +4079,8 @@ change: new_effective_prio =rt_mutex_get_effective_prio (p, newprio);if (new_effective_prio == oldprio) {__setscheduler_params (p, attr); +if (p->sched_class == &dl_sched_class) + p->sched_class->prio_changed (rq, p, oldprio);task_rq_unlock (rq, p, &flags);return 0 ; }That code no longer exists like that.
Uh... I must have done something wrong, then (I was convinced I pulled from master and rebased my patch before testing and sending it, but probably something went wrong).
Sorry about that.
Quoted 2 lines
Can you see if the below patch (which caused that) also fixes your problem?
Ok; in the next days I'll make sure to have this patch applied and I'll test it.
Thanks,
Luca
Quoted 466 lines
---
commitff77e468535987b3d21b7bd4da15608ea3ce7d0bAuthor: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Date: Mon Jan 18 15:27:07 2016 +0100sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs.
sched_setscheduler()Andrea Parri reported:
> I found that the following scenario (with
CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not > handled correctly:
>
> T1 (prio = 20)
> lock(rtmutex);
>
> T2 (prio = 20)
> blocks on rtmutex (rt_nr_boosted= 0 on T1's rq)
>
> T1 (prio = 20)
>sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0)
> [new_effective_prio== oldprio]
> T1 prio = 20 (rt_nr_boosted= 0 on T1's rq)
>
> The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f.,rt_se_boosted()); > in particular, if we continue with
>
> T1 (prio = 20)
> unlock(rtmutex)
> wakeup(T2)
>adjust_prio(T1)
> [prio !=rt_mutex_getprio(T1)]
> dequeue(T1)
>rt_nr_boosted= (unsigned long)(-1)
> ...
> T1 prio = 0
>
> then we end up leavingrt_nr_boostedin an "inconsistent" state. >
> The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note > that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion" >
>WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted)
>
> fromdec_rt_group()may trigger.So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in
sched_setscheduler(), which would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path we fail to do so.So this was introduced at around v3.14, by:
c365c292d059("sched: Consider pi boosting insetscheduler()")which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy.
Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling the
on_rt_rq()state from being on the list.In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE, introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these cases to preserve other invariants.
Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch).
Reported-by Andrea Parri <[email protected]>Tested-by Andrea Parri <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>Cc Juri Lelli <[email protected]>Cc Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>Cc Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>Cc Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>Cc Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>Cc Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>include/linux/sched.h +2
-0@@ -1293,6 +1293,8 @@ struct sched_rt_entity {unsigned long timeout;unsigned long watchdog_stamp;unsigned int time_slice; +unsigned short on_rq; +unsigned short on_list;struct sched_rt_entity *back;#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED kernel/sched/core.c +22
-17@@ -2221,6 +2221,10 @@ static void __sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)__dl_clear_params (p);INIT_LIST_HEAD (&p->rt.run_list); + p->rt.timeout =0 ; + p->rt.time_slice = sched_rr_timeslice; + p->rt.on_rq =0 ; + p->rt.on_list =0 ;#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS INIT_HLIST_HEAD (&p->preempt_notifiers);@@ -3531,7 +3535,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(default_wake_function);*/ void rt_mutex_setprio (struct task_struct *p,int prio) { -int oldprio, queued, running, enqueue_flag =ENQUEUE_RESTORE ; +int oldprio, queued, running, queue_flag =DEQUEUE_SAVE |DEQUEUE_MOVE ;struct rq *rq;const struct sched_class *prev_class;@@ -3559,11 +3563,15 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)trace_sched_pi_setprio (p, prio); oldprio = p->prio; + +if (oldprio == prio) + queue_flag &= ~DEQUEUE_MOVE ; + prev_class = p->sched_class; queued =task_on_rq_queued (p); running =task_current (rq, p);if (queued) -dequeue_task (rq, p,DEQUEUE_SAVE ); +dequeue_task (rq, p, queue_flag);if (running)put_prev_task (rq, p);@@ -3581,7 +3589,7 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)if (!dl_prio (p->normal_prio) || (pi_task &&dl_entity_preempt (&pi_task->dl, &p->dl))) { p->dl.dl_boosted =1 ; - enqueue_flag |=ENQUEUE_REPLENISH ; + queue_flag |=ENQUEUE_REPLENISH ; }else p->dl.dl_boosted =0 ; p->sched_class = &dl_sched_class;@@ -3589,7 +3597,7 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)if (dl_prio (oldprio)) p->dl.dl_boosted =0 ;if (oldprio < prio) - enqueue_flag |=ENQUEUE_HEAD ; + queue_flag |=ENQUEUE_HEAD ; p->sched_class = &rt_sched_class; }else {if (dl_prio (oldprio))@@ -3604,7 +3612,7 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)if (running) p->sched_class->set_curr_task (rq);if (queued) -enqueue_task (rq, p, enqueue_flag); +enqueue_task (rq, p, queue_flag);check_class_changed (rq, p, prev_class, oldprio); out_unlock:@@ -3960,6 +3968,7 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,const struct sched_class *prev_class;struct rq *rq;int reset_on_fork; +int queue_flags =DEQUEUE_SAVE |DEQUEUE_MOVE ;/* may grab non-irq protected spin_locks */ BUG_ON (in_interrupt ());@@ -4142,17 +4151,14 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,* itself. */ new_effective_prio =rt_mutex_get_effective_prio (p, newprio); -if (new_effective_prio == oldprio) { -__setscheduler_params (p, attr); -task_rq_unlock (rq, p, &flags); -return 0 ; - } +if (new_effective_prio == oldprio) + queue_flags &= ~DEQUEUE_MOVE ; } queued =task_on_rq_queued (p); running =task_current (rq, p);if (queued) -dequeue_task (rq, p,DEQUEUE_SAVE ); +dequeue_task (rq, p, queue_flags);if (running)put_prev_task (rq, p);@@ -4162,15 +4168,14 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,if (running) p->sched_class->set_curr_task (rq);if (queued) { -int enqueue_flags =ENQUEUE_RESTORE ;/* * We enqueue to tail when the priority of a task is * increased (user space view). */ -if (oldprio <= p->prio) - enqueue_flags |=ENQUEUE_HEAD ; +if (oldprio < p->prio) + queue_flags |=ENQUEUE_HEAD ; -enqueue_task (rq, p, enqueue_flags); +enqueue_task (rq, p, queue_flags); }check_class_changed (rq, p, prev_class, oldprio);@@ -7958,7 +7963,7 @@ void sched_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk) queued =task_on_rq_queued (tsk);if (queued) -dequeue_task (rq, tsk,DEQUEUE_SAVE ); +dequeue_task (rq, tsk,DEQUEUE_SAVE |DEQUEUE_MOVE );if (unlikely (running))put_prev_task (rq, tsk);@@ -7982,7 +7987,7 @@ void sched_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk)if (unlikely (running)) tsk->sched_class->set_curr_task (rq);if (queued) -enqueue_task (rq, tsk,ENQUEUE_RESTORE ); +enqueue_task (rq, tsk,ENQUEUE_RESTORE |ENQUEUE_MOVE );task_rq_unlock (rq, tsk, &flags); }kernel/sched/rt.c +60
-26@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ static void dequeue_top_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq);static inline int on_rt_rq (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se) { -return !list_empty (&rt_se->run_list); +return rt_se->on_rq; }#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED @@ -482,8 +482,8 @@ static inline struct rt_rq *group_rt_rq(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)return rt_se->my_q; } -static void enqueue_rt_entity (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,bool head); -static void dequeue_rt_entity (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se); +static void enqueue_rt_entity (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,unsigned int flags); +static void dequeue_rt_entity (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,unsigned int flags);static void sched_rt_rq_enqueue (struct rt_rq *rt_rq) {@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ static void sched_rt_rq_enqueue(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)if (!rt_se)enqueue_top_rt_rq (rt_rq);else if (!on_rt_rq (rt_se)) -enqueue_rt_entity (rt_se, false); +enqueue_rt_entity (rt_se,0 );if (rt_rq->highest_prio.curr < curr->prio)resched_curr (rq);@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ static void sched_rt_rq_dequeue(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)if (!rt_se)dequeue_top_rt_rq (rt_rq);else if (on_rt_rq (rt_se)) -dequeue_rt_entity (rt_se); +dequeue_rt_entity (rt_se,0 ); }static inline int rt_rq_throttled (struct rt_rq *rt_rq)@@ -1166,7 +1166,30 @@ void dec_rt_tasks(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)dec_rt_group (rt_se, rt_rq); } -static void __enqueue_rt_entity (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,bool head) +/* +* Change rt_se->run_list location unless SAVE && !MOVE +* +* assumes ENQUEUE/DEQUEUE flags match +*/ +static inline bool move_entity (unsigned int flags) +{ +if ((flags & (DEQUEUE_SAVE |DEQUEUE_MOVE )) ==DEQUEUE_SAVE ) +return false; + +return true; +} + +static void __delist_rt_entity (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,struct rt_prio_array *array) +{ +list_del_init (&rt_se->run_list); + +if (list_empty (array->queue +rt_se_prio (rt_se))) +__clear_bit (rt_se_prio (rt_se), array->bitmap); + + rt_se->on_list =0 ; +} + +static void __enqueue_rt_entity (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,unsigned int flags) {struct rt_rq *rt_rq =rt_rq_of_se (rt_se);struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active;@@ -1179,26 +1202,37 @@ static void __enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, bool head)* get throttled and the current group doesn't have any other * active members. */ -if (group_rq && (rt_rq_throttled (group_rq) || !group_rq->rt_nr_running)) +if (group_rq && (rt_rq_throttled (group_rq) || !group_rq->rt_nr_running)) { +if (rt_se->on_list) +__delist_rt_entity (rt_se, array);return ; + } -if (head) -list_add (&rt_se->run_list, queue); -else -list_add_tail (&rt_se->run_list, queue); -__set_bit (rt_se_prio (rt_se), array->bitmap); +if (move_entity (flags)) { +WARN_ON_ONCE (rt_se->on_list); +if (flags &ENQUEUE_HEAD ) +list_add (&rt_se->run_list, queue); +else +list_add_tail (&rt_se->run_list, queue); + +__set_bit (rt_se_prio (rt_se), array->bitmap); + rt_se->on_list =1 ; + } + rt_se->on_rq =1 ;inc_rt_tasks (rt_se, rt_rq); } -static void __dequeue_rt_entity (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se) +static void __dequeue_rt_entity (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,unsigned int flags) {struct rt_rq *rt_rq =rt_rq_of_se (rt_se);struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active; -list_del_init (&rt_se->run_list); -if (list_empty (array->queue +rt_se_prio (rt_se))) -__clear_bit (rt_se_prio (rt_se), array->bitmap); +if (move_entity (flags)) { +WARN_ON_ONCE (!rt_se->on_list); +__delist_rt_entity (rt_se, array); + } + rt_se->on_rq =0 ;dec_rt_tasks (rt_se, rt_rq); }@@ -1207,7 +1241,7 @@ static void __dequeue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)* Because the prio of an upper entry depends on the lower * entries, we must remove entries top - down. */ -static void dequeue_rt_stack (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se) +static void dequeue_rt_stack (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,unsigned int flags) {struct sched_rt_entity *back =NULL ;@@ -1220,31 +1254,31 @@ static void dequeue_rt_stack(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)for (rt_se = back; rt_se; rt_se = rt_se->back) {if (on_rt_rq (rt_se)) -__dequeue_rt_entity (rt_se); +__dequeue_rt_entity (rt_se, flags); } } -static void enqueue_rt_entity (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,bool head) +static void enqueue_rt_entity (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,unsigned int flags) {struct rq *rq =rq_of_rt_se (rt_se); -dequeue_rt_stack (rt_se); +dequeue_rt_stack (rt_se, flags);for_each_sched_rt_entity (rt_se) -__enqueue_rt_entity (rt_se, head); +__enqueue_rt_entity (rt_se, flags);enqueue_top_rt_rq (&rq->rt); } -static void dequeue_rt_entity (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se) +static void dequeue_rt_entity (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,unsigned int flags) {struct rq *rq =rq_of_rt_se (rt_se); -dequeue_rt_stack (rt_se); +dequeue_rt_stack (rt_se, flags);for_each_sched_rt_entity (rt_se) {struct rt_rq *rt_rq =group_rt_rq (rt_se);if (rt_rq && rt_rq->rt_nr_running) -__enqueue_rt_entity (rt_se, false); +__enqueue_rt_entity (rt_se, flags); }enqueue_top_rt_rq (&rq->rt); }@@ -1260,7 +1294,7 @@ enqueue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)if (flags &ENQUEUE_WAKEUP ) rt_se->timeout =0 ; -enqueue_rt_entity (rt_se, flags &ENQUEUE_HEAD ); +enqueue_rt_entity (rt_se, flags);if (!task_current (rq, p) && p->nr_cpus_allowed >1 )enqueue_pushable_task (rq, p);@@ -1271,7 +1305,7 @@ static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se = &p->rt;update_curr_rt (rq); -dequeue_rt_entity (rt_se); +dequeue_rt_entity (rt_se, flags);dequeue_pushable_task (rq, p); }kernel/sched/sched.h +29
-7@@ -1130,18 +1130,40 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)extern const int sched_prio_to_weight[40 ];extern const u32 sched_prio_to_wmult[40 ]; +/* +* {de,en}queue flags: +* +* DEQUEUE_SLEEP - task is no longer runnable +* ENQUEUE_WAKEUP - task just became runnable +* +* SAVE/RESTORE - an otherwise spurious dequeue/enqueue, done to ensure tasks +* are in a known state which allows modification. Such pairs +* should preserve as much state as possible. +* +* MOVE - paired with SAVE/RESTORE, explicitly does not preserve the location +* in the runqueue. +* +* ENQUEUE_HEAD - place at front of runqueue (tail if not specified) +* ENQUEUE_REPLENISH - CBS (replenish runtime and postpone deadline) +* ENQUEUE_WAKING - sched_class::task_waking was called +* +*/ + +#define DEQUEUE_SLEEP 0x01 +#define DEQUEUE_SAVE 0x02/* matches ENQUEUE_RESTORE */ +#define DEQUEUE_MOVE 0x04/* matches ENQUEUE_MOVE */ +#define ENQUEUE_WAKEUP 0x01 -#define ENQUEUE_HEAD 0x02 +#define ENQUEUE_RESTORE 0x02 +#define ENQUEUE_MOVE 0x04 + +#define ENQUEUE_HEAD 0x08 +#define ENQUEUE_REPLENISH 0x10#ifdef CONFIG_SMP -#define ENQUEUE_WAKING 0x04/* sched_class::task_waking was called */ +#define ENQUEUE_WAKING 0x20#else #define ENQUEUE_WAKING 0x00#endif -#define ENQUEUE_REPLENISH 0x08 -#define ENQUEUE_RESTORE 0x10 - -#define DEQUEUE_SLEEP 0x01 -#define DEQUEUE_SAVE 0x02#define RETRY_TASK ((void *)-1UL)
Peter Zijlstra
maintainerQuoted 5 lines · luca abeni
Quoted 1 line
That code no longer exists like that.
Uh... I must have done something wrong, then (I was convinced I pulled from master and rebased my patch before testing and sending it, but probably something went wrong).
Sorry about that.
No my bad, that patch got stuck in my queue for a very long time because I was running after perf problems. Sorry about that.
Hi Peter,
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 20:02:58 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
Quoted 13 lines
Review
Quoted 10 lines
+++
b/kernel/sched/core.c(quoted diff) +0
-0@@ -4079,6 +4079,8 @@ change: new_effective_prio =
rt_mutex_get_effective_prio(p, newprio); if (new_effective_prio== oldprio) {__setscheduler_params(p, attr);(quoted diff) +2
-0+ if (p->sched_class == &dl_sched_class) + p->sched_class->prio_changed(rq,p, oldprio);
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &flags);(quoted diff) +0
-0return 0; }That code no longer exists like that.
Quoted 2 lines
Can you see if the below patch (which caused that) also fixes your problem?
Some quick tests show that your patch seems to solve this issue too... So, I am using this one locally instead of my patch.
Thanks,
Luca
Quoted 476 lines
---
commitff77e468535987b3d21b7bd4da15608ea3ce7d0bAuthor: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Date: Mon Jan 18 15:27:07 2016 +0100sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler() Andrea Parri reported: > I found that the following scenario (with > CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not handled correctly: > > T1 (prio = 20) > lock(rtmutex); > > T2 (prio = 20) > blocks on rtmutex (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > T1 (prio = 20) > sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0) > [new_effective_prio == oldprio] > T1 prio = 20 (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., > rt_se_boosted()); in particular, if we continue with > > T1 (prio = 20) > unlock(rtmutex) > wakeup(T2) > adjust_prio(T1) > [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)] > dequeue(T1) > rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1) > ... > T1 prio = 0 > > then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state. > > The simple program attached could reproduce the previous > scenario; note that, as a consequence of the presence of this > state, the "assertion" > > WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted) > > from dec_rt_group() may trigger. So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(),which would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path we fail to do so.
So this was introduced at around v3.14, by:
c365c292d059("sched: Consider pi boosting insetscheduler()")which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue,
joy.
Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and
have it preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling theon_rt_rq()state from being on the list.In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE, introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in
these cases to preserve other invariants.Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect
that things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch).Reported-by Andrea Parri <[email protected]>Tested-by Andrea Parri <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>Cc Juri Lelli <[email protected]>Cc Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>Cc Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>Cc Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>Cc Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>Cc Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>include/linux/sched.h +2
-0@@ -1293,6 +1293,8 @@ struct sched_rt_entity {unsigned long timeout;unsigned long watchdog_stamp;unsigned int time_slice; +unsigned short on_rq; +unsigned short on_list;struct sched_rt_entity *back;#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED kernel/sched/core.c +10
-2@@ -2221,6 +2221,10 @@ static void __sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p) __dl_clear_params(p);INIT_LIST_HEAD (&p->rt.run_list); + p->rt.timeout =0 ; + p->rt.time_slice = sched_rr_timeslice; + p->rt.on_rq =0 ; + p->rt.on_list =0 ;#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS INIT_HLIST_HEAD (&p->preempt_notifiers);@@ -3531,7 +3535,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(default_wake_function);*/ void rt_mutex_setprio (struct task_struct *p,int prio) { -int oldprio, queued, running, enqueue_flag =ENQUEUE_RESTORE ; +int oldprio, queued, running, queue_flag =DEQUEUE_SAVE |DEQUEUE_MOVE ;struct rq *rq;const struct sched_class *prev_class;@@ -3559,11 +3563,15 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)trace_sched_pi_setprio (p ,prio ); oldprio = p->prio; + +if (oldprio == prio) + queue_flag &= ~DEQUEUE_MOVE ; + prev_class = p->sched_class; queued =task_on_rq_queued (p); running =task_current (rq, p);if (queued) -dequeue_task (rq, p,DEQUEUE_SAVE ); +dequeue_task (rq, p, queue_flag);if (running)put_prev_task (rq, p);@@ -3581,7 +3589,7 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p,int prio) if (!dl_prio(p->normal_prio) ||
(pi_task&& dl_entity_preempt(&pi_task->dl,&p->dl))) {p->dl.dl_boosted= 1;kernel/sched/core.c +7
-9- enqueue_flag |=ENQUEUE_REPLENISH ; + queue_flag |=ENQUEUE_REPLENISH ; }else p->dl.dl_boosted =0 ; p->sched_class = &dl_sched_class;@@ -3589,7 +3597,7 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio) if (dl_prio(oldprio)) p->dl.dl_boosted =0 ;if (oldprio < prio) - enqueue_flag |=ENQUEUE_HEAD ; + queue_flag |=ENQUEUE_HEAD ; p->sched_class = &rt_sched_class; }else {if (dl_prio (oldprio))@@ -3604,7 +3612,7 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio) if (running) p->sched_class->set_curr_task (rq);if (queued) -enqueue_task (rq, p, enqueue_flag); +enqueue_task (rq, p, queue_flag);check_class_changed (rq, p, prev_class, oldprio); out_unlock:@@ -3960,6 +3968,7 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, const struct sched_class *prev_class;struct rq *rq;int reset_on_fork; +int queue_flags =DEQUEUE_SAVE |DEQUEUE_MOVE ;/* may grab non-irq protected spin_locks */ BUG_ON (in_interrupt ());@@ -4142,17 +4151,14 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(structtask_struct *p, * itself. */ new_effective_prio =rt_mutex_get_effective_prio (p, newprio); -if (new_effective_prio == oldprio) { -__setscheduler_params (p, attr); -task_rq_unlock (rq, p, &flags); -return 0 ; - } +if (new_effective_prio == oldprio) + queue_flags &= ~DEQUEUE_MOVE ; } queued =task_on_rq_queued (p); running =task_current (rq, p);if (queued) -dequeue_task (rq, p,DEQUEUE_SAVE ); +dequeue_task (rq, p, queue_flags);if (running)kernel/sched/core.c +5
-6put_prev_task (rq, p);@@ -4162,15 +4168,14 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, if (running) p->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq);if (queued) { -int enqueue_flags =ENQUEUE_RESTORE ;/* * We enqueue to tail when the priority of a task is * increased (user space view). */ -if (oldprio <= p->prio) - enqueue_flags |=ENQUEUE_HEAD ; +if (oldprio < p->prio) + queue_flags |=ENQUEUE_HEAD ; -enqueue_task (rq, p, enqueue_flags); +enqueue_task (rq, p, queue_flags); }check_class_changed (rq, p, prev_class, oldprio);@@ -7958,7 +7963,7 @@ void sched_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk) queued =task_on_rq_queued (tsk);if (queued) -dequeue_task (rq, tsk,DEQUEUE_SAVE ); +dequeue_task (rq, tsk,DEQUEUE_SAVE |DEQUEUE_MOVE );if (unlikely (running))put_prev_task (rq, tsk);@@ -7982,7 +7987,7 @@ void sched_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk)if (unlikely (running)) tsk->sched_class->set_curr_task (rq);if (queued) -enqueue_task (rq, tsk,ENQUEUE_RESTORE ); +enqueue_task (rq, tsk,ENQUEUE_RESTORE |ENQUEUE_MOVE );task_rq_unlock (rq, tsk, &flags); }kernel/sched/rt.c +2
-2@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ static void dequeue_top_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq);static inline int on_rt_rq (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se) { -return !list_empty (&rt_se->run_list); +return rt_se->on_rq; }#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED @@ -482,8 +482,8 @@ static inline struct rt_rq *group_rt_rq(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se) return rt_se->my_q; } -static void enqueue_rt_entity (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,bool head); -static void dequeue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se); +static void enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,unsigned int flags); +static void
dequeue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flags);
static voidsched_rt_rq_enqueue(struct rt_rq *rt_rq){kernel/sched/rt.c +2
-3@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ static void sched_rt_rq_enqueue(struct rt_rq *rt_rq) if (!rt_se)enqueue_top_rt_rq (rt_rq);else if (!on_rt_rq (rt_se)) -enqueue_rt_entity (rt_se, false); +enqueue_rt_entity (rt_se,0 );if (rt_rq->highest_prio.curr < curr->prio)resched_curr (rq);@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ static void sched_rt_rq_dequeue(struct rt_rq *rt_rq) if (!rt_se)dequeue_top_rt_rq (rt_rq);else if (on_rt_rq (rt_se)) -dequeue_rt_entity (rt_se); +dequeue_rt_entity (rt_se,0 ); }static inline int rt_rq_throttled (struct rt_rq *rt_rq)@@ -1166,7 +1166,30 @@ void dec_rt_tasks(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq) dec_rt_group(rt_se, rt_rq); } -static void __enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, boolhead) +/*
+ * Changert_se->run_listlocation unless SAVE && !MOVE
+ *
+ * assumes ENQUEUE/DEQUEUE flags match
+ */kernel/sched/rt.c +9
-0+static inline bool move_entity (unsigned int flags) +{ +if ((flags & (DEQUEUE_SAVE |DEQUEUE_MOVE )) ==DEQUEUE_SAVE ) +return false; + +return true; +} + +static void __delist_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct
rt_prio_array*array) +{kernel/sched/rt.c +9
-0+list_del_init (&rt_se->run_list); + +if (list_empty (array->queue +rt_se_prio (rt_se))) +__clear_bit (rt_se_prio (rt_se), array->bitmap); + + rt_se->on_list =0 ; +} + +static void __enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,unsigned int flags) {
kernel/sched/rt.c +21
-10struct rt_rq *rt_rq =rt_rq_of_se (rt_se);struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active;@@ -1179,26 +1202,37 @@ static void __enqueue_rt_entity(structsched_rt_entity *rt_se, bool head) * get throttled and the current group doesn't have any other * active members. */ -if (group_rq && (rt_rq_throttled (group_rq) || !group_rq->rt_nr_running)) +if (group_rq && (rt_rq_throttled (group_rq) || !group_rq->rt_nr_running)) { +if (rt_se->on_list) +__delist_rt_entity (rt_se, array);return ; + } -if (head) -list_add (&rt_se->run_list, queue); -else -list_add_tail (&rt_se->run_list, queue); -__set_bit (rt_se_prio (rt_se), array->bitmap); +if (move_entity (flags)) { +WARN_ON_ONCE (rt_se->on_list); +if (flags &ENQUEUE_HEAD ) +list_add (&rt_se->run_list, queue); +else +list_add_tail (&rt_se->run_list, queue); + +__set_bit (rt_se_prio (rt_se), array->bitmap); + rt_se->on_list =1 ; + } + rt_se->on_rq =1 ;inc_rt_tasks (rt_se, rt_rq); } -static void __dequeue_rt_entity (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se) +static void __dequeue_rt_entity (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,unsigned int flags) {struct rt_rq *rt_rq =rt_rq_of_se (rt_se);struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active; -list_del_init (&rt_se->run_list); -if (list_empty (array->queue +rt_se_prio (rt_se))) -__clear_bit (rt_se_prio (rt_se), array->bitmap); +if (move_entity (flags)) { +WARN_ON_ONCE (!rt_se->on_list); +__delist_rt_entity (rt_se, array); + } + rt_se->on_rq =0 ;kernel/sched/rt.c +8
-9dec_rt_tasks (rt_se, rt_rq); }@@ -1207,7 +1241,7 @@ static void __dequeue_rt_entity(structsched_rt_entity *rt_se) * Because the prio of an upper entry depends on the lower * entries, we must remove entries top - down. */ -static void dequeue_rt_stack (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se) +static void dequeue_rt_stack (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,unsigned int flags) {struct sched_rt_entity *back =NULL ;@@ -1220,31 +1254,31 @@ static void dequeue_rt_stack(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)for (rt_se = back; rt_se; rt_se = rt_se->back) {if (on_rt_rq (rt_se)) -__dequeue_rt_entity (rt_se); +__dequeue_rt_entity (rt_se, flags); } } -static void enqueue_rt_entity (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,bool head) +static void enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,unsigned int flags) {struct rq *rq =rq_of_rt_se (rt_se); -dequeue_rt_stack (rt_se); +dequeue_rt_stack (rt_se, flags);for_each_sched_rt_entity (rt_se) -__enqueue_rt_entity (rt_se, head); +__enqueue_rt_entity (rt_se, flags);enqueue_top_rt_rq (&rq->rt); } -static void dequeue_rt_entity (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se) +static void dequeue_rt_entity (struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,unsigned int flags) {struct rq *rq =rq_of_rt_se (rt_se); -dequeue_rt_stack (rt_se); +dequeue_rt_stack (rt_se, flags);for_each_sched_rt_entity (rt_se) {struct rt_rq *rt_rq =group_rt_rq (rt_se);if (rt_rq && rt_rq->rt_nr_running) -__enqueue_rt_entity (rt_se, false); +__enqueue_rt_entity (rt_se, flags); }enqueue_top_rt_rq (&rq->rt); }@@ -1260,7 +1294,7 @@ enqueue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags) if (flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP) rt_se->timeout = 0; -enqueue_rt_entity (rt_se, flags &ENQUEUE_HEAD ); +enqueue_rt_entity (rt_se, flags);if (!task_current (rq, p) && p->nr_cpus_allowed >1 )enqueue_pushable_task (rq, p);@@ -1271,7 +1305,7 @@ static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq,struct
task_struct*p, int flags) structsched_rt_entity*rt_se=&p->rt;kernel/sched/rt.c +1
-1update_curr_rt (rq); -dequeue_rt_entity (rt_se); +dequeue_rt_entity (rt_se, flags);dequeue_pushable_task (rq, p); }kernel/sched/sched.h +0
-0@@ -1130,18 +1130,40 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(structrq *rq, struct
task_struct*prev) extern const int sched_prio_to_weight[40]; extern const u32 sched_prio_to_wmult[40];+/*
+ * {de,en}queue flags:
+ *
+ *DEQUEUE_SLEEP- task is no longer runnable
+ *ENQUEUE_WAKEUP- task just became runnable
+ *
+ * SAVE/RESTORE - an otherwise spurious dequeue/enqueue, done to ensure tasks
+ * are in a known state which allows modification.
Such pairs
+ * should preserve as much state as possible.
+ *
+ * MOVE - paired with SAVE/RESTORE, explicitly does not preserve the location
+ * in the runqueue.
+ *
+ *ENQUEUE_HEAD- place at front of runqueue (tail if not
specified)
+ *ENQUEUE_REPLENISH- CBS (replenish runtime and postpone deadline)
+ *ENQUEUE_WAKING-sched_class::task_wakingwas called
+ *
+ */kernel/sched/sched.h +3
-0+ +#define DEQUEUE_SLEEP 0x01 +#define DEQUEUE_SAVE 0x02/* matches ENQUEUE_RESTORE */ +#define
DEQUEUE_MOVE0x04/* matchesENQUEUE_MOVE
*/ +
#defineENQUEUE_WAKEUP0x01kernel/sched/sched.h +5
-2-#define ENQUEUE_HEAD 0x02 +#define ENQUEUE_RESTORE 0x02 +#define ENQUEUE_MOVE 0x04 + +#define ENQUEUE_HEAD 0x08 +#define ENQUEUE_REPLENISH 0x10#ifdef CONFIG_SMP -#define ENQUEUE_WAKING 0x04/*
sched_class::task_wakingwas called */ +#defineENQUEUE_WAKING0x20#else
#defineENQUEUE_WAKING0x00
#endifkernel/sched/sched.h +0
-5-#define ENQUEUE_REPLENISH 0x08 -#define ENQUEUE_RESTORE 0x10 - -#define DEQUEUE_SLEEP 0x01 -#define DEQUEUE_SAVE 0x02#define RETRY_TASK ((void *)-1UL)