zram: revive swap_slot_free_notify
Subsystems (2)
Quoted 136 lines · Minchan Kim
<
b430e9d1c6d4> "remove compressed copy from zram in-memory" appliedswap_slot_free_notifycall in *end_swap_bio_read* to remove duplicated memory between zram and memory.However, with introducing
rw_pagein zram <8c7f01025f7b> "zram: implementrw_pageoperation of zram", it became void becauserw_pagedoesn't need bio.This patch restores the function for
rw_page.Signed-off-by Minchan Kim <[email protected]>--- mm/page_io.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------- 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)mm/page_io.c +50
-43@@ -66,6 +66,54 @@ void end_swap_bio_write(struct bio *bio)bio_put (bio); } +static void swap_slot_free_notify (struct page *page) +{ +struct swap_info_struct *sis; +struct gendisk *disk; + +/* +* There is no guarantee that the page is in swap cache - the software +* suspend code (at least) uses end_swap_bio_read() against a non- +* swapcache page. So we must check PG_swapcache before proceeding with +* this optimization. +*/ +if (unlikely (!PageSwapCache (page))) +return ; + + sis =page_swap_info (page); +if (!(sis->flags &SWP_BLKDEV )) +return ; + +/* +* The swap subsystem performs lazy swap slot freeing, +* expecting that the page will be swapped out again. +* So we can avoid an unnecessary write if the page +* isn't redirtied. +* This is good for real swap storage because we can +* reduce unnecessary I/O and enhance wear-leveling +* if an SSD is used as the as swap device. +* But if in-memory swap device (eg zram) is used, +* this causes a duplicated copy between uncompressed +* data in VM-owned memory and compressed data in +* zram-owned memory. So let's free zram-owned memory +* and make the VM-owned decompressed page *dirty*, +* so the page should be swapped out somewhere again if +* we again wish to reclaim it. +*/ + disk = sis->bdev->bd_disk; +if (disk->fops->swap_slot_free_notify) { +swp_entry_t entry; +unsigned long offset; + + entry.val =page_private (page); + offset =swp_offset (entry); + +SetPageDirty (page); + disk->fops->swap_slot_free_notify (sis->bdev, + offset); + } +} +static void end_swap_bio_read (struct bio *bio) {struct page *page = bio->bi_io_vec[0 ].bv_page;@@ -81,49 +129,7 @@ static void end_swap_bio_read(struct bio *bio) }SetPageUptodate (page); - -/* -* There is no guarantee that the page is in swap cache - the software -* suspend code (at least) uses end_swap_bio_read() against a non- -* swapcache page. So we must check PG_swapcache before proceeding with -* this optimization. -*/ -if (likely (PageSwapCache (page))) { -struct swap_info_struct *sis; - - sis =page_swap_info (page); -if (sis->flags &SWP_BLKDEV ) { -/* -* The swap subsystem performs lazy swap slot freeing, -* expecting that the page will be swapped out again. -* So we can avoid an unnecessary write if the page -* isn't redirtied. -* This is good for real swap storage because we can -* reduce unnecessary I/O and enhance wear-leveling -* if an SSD is used as the as swap device. -* But if in-memory swap device (eg zram) is used, -* this causes a duplicated copy between uncompressed -* data in VM-owned memory and compressed data in -* zram-owned memory. So let's free zram-owned memory -* and make the VM-owned decompressed page *dirty*, -* so the page should be swapped out somewhere again if -* we again wish to reclaim it. -*/ -struct gendisk *disk = sis->bdev->bd_disk; -if (disk->fops->swap_slot_free_notify) { -swp_entry_t entry; -unsigned long offset; - - entry.val =page_private (page); - offset =swp_offset (entry); - -SetPageDirty (page); - disk->fops->swap_slot_free_notify (sis->bdev, - offset); - } - } - } - +swap_slot_free_notify (page); out:unlock_page (page);bio_put (bio);@@ -347,6 +353,7 @@ int swap_readpage(struct page *page) ret =bdev_read_page (sis->bdev,swap_page_sector (page), page);if (!ret) { +swap_slot_free_notify (page);count_vm_event (PSWPIN );return 0 ; }Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
Kyeongdon, Could you try this patch?
Quoted 1 line
From
09497ba48f5621cd2737f72ac4d15e6b3e5e3d14Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Minchan Kim <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 23:08:14 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] mm: call swap_slot_free_notify with holding page lock
Kyeongdon reported below error which is BUG_ON(!PageSwapCache(page)) in page_swap_info.
The reason is that page_endio in rw_page unlocks the page if read I/O is completed so we need to hold a PG_lock again to check PageSwapCache. Otherwise, the page can be removed from swapcache and trigger below BUG_ON.
[27833.995833] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [27833.995853] Kernel BUG at c00f9040 [verbose debug info unavailable] [27833.995865] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ARM [27833.995876] Modules linked in: [27833.995892] CPU: 4 PID: 13446 Comm: RenderThread Tainted: G W 3.10.84-g9f14aec-dirty #73 [27833.995903] task: c3b73200 ti: dd192000 task.ti: dd192000 [27833.995922] PC is at page_swap_info+0x10/0x2c [27833.995934] LR is at swap_slot_free_notify+0x18/0x6c [27833.995946] pc : [<c00f9040>] lr : [<c00f5560>] psr: 400f0113 [27833.995946] sp : dd193d78 ip : c2deb1e4 fp : da015180 [27833.995959] r10: 00000000 r9 : 000200da r8 : c120fe08 [27833.995968] r7 : 00000000 r6 : 00000000 r5 : c249a6c0 r4 : = c249a6c0 [27833.995979] r3 : 00000000 r2 : 40080009 r1 : 200f0113 r0 : = c249a6c0 ..<snip> [27833.996273] [<c00f9040>] (page_swap_info+0x10/0x2c) from [<c00f5560>] (swap_slot_free_notify+0x18/0x6c) [27833.996288] [<c00f5560>] (swap_slot_free_notify+0x18/0x6c) from [<c00f5c5c>] (swap_readpage+0x90/0x11c) [27833.996302] [<c00f5c5c>] (swap_readpage+0x90/0x11c) from [<c00f62dc>] (read_swap_cache_async+0x134/0x1ac) [27833.996317] [<c00f62dc>] (read_swap_cache_async+0x134/0x1ac) from [<c00f63c4>] (swapin_readahead+0x70/0xb0) [27833.996334] [<c00f63c4>] (swapin_readahead+0x70/0xb0) from = [<c00e87e0>] (handle_pte_fault+0x320/0x6fc) [27833.996348] [<c00e87e0>] (handle_pte_fault+0x320/0x6fc) from [<c00e8c7c>] (handle_mm_fault+0xc0/0xf0) [27833.996363] [<c00e8c7c>] (handle_mm_fault+0xc0/0xf0) from = [<c001ac18>] (do_page_fault+0x11c/0x36c) [27833.996378] [<c001ac18>] (do_page_fault+0x11c/0x36c) from = [<c000838c>] (do_DataAbort+0x34/0x118) [27833.996392] [<c000838c>] (do_DataAbort+0x34/0x118) from [<c000d8b4>]
(__dabt_usr+0x34/0x40)
--- mm/page_io.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
mm/page_io.c +5 -1
@@ -353,7 +353,11 @@ int swap_readpage(struct page *page) ret =bdev_read_page (sis->bdev,swap_page_sector (page), page);if (!ret) { -swap_slot_free_notify (page); +if (trylock_page (page)) { +swap_slot_free_notify (page); +unlock_page (page); + } +count_vm_event (PSWPIN );return 0 ; }
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
Kyeongdon Kim
Tested-byQuoted 190 lines · Minchan Kim
Quoted 8 lines · Minchan Kim
<
b430e9d1c6d4> "remove compressed copy from zram in-memory" appliedswap_slot_free_notifycall in *end_swap_bio_read* to remove duplicated memory between zram and memory.However, with introducing
rw_pagein zram <8c7f01025f7b> "zram: implementrw_pageoperation of zram", it became void becauserw_pagedoesn't need bio.Quoted 5 lines
This patch restores the function for
rw_page.Signed-off-by Minchan Kim <[email protected]>---
mm/page_io.c| 93++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
Quoted 121 lines
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)mm/page_io.c +49
-43@@ -66,6 +66,54 @@ void end_swap_bio_write(struct bio *bio)bio_put (bio); } +static void swap_slot_free_notify (struct page *page) +{ +struct swap_info_struct *sis; +struct gendisk *disk; + +/* +* There is no guarantee that the page is in swap cache - the software +* suspend code (at least) uses end_swap_bio_read() against a non- +* swapcache page. So we must check PG_swapcache before proceeding with +* this optimization. +*/ +if (unlikely (!PageSwapCache (page))) +return ; + + sis =page_swap_info (page); +if (!(sis->flags &SWP_BLKDEV )) +return ; + +/* +* The swap subsystem performs lazy swap slot freeing, +* expecting that the page will be swapped out again. +* So we can avoid an unnecessary write if the page +* isn't redirtied. +* This is good for real swap storage because we can +* reduce unnecessary I/O and enhance wear-leveling +* if an SSD is used as the as swap device. +* But if in-memory swap device (eg zram) is used, +* this causes a duplicated copy between uncompressed +* data in VM-owned memory and compressed data in +* zram-owned memory. So let's free zram-owned memory +* and make the VM-owned decompressed page *dirty*, +* so the page should be swapped out somewhere again if +* we again wish to reclaim it. +*/ + disk = sis->bdev->bd_disk; +if (disk->fops->swap_slot_free_notify) { +swp_entry_t entry; +unsigned long offset; + + entry.val =page_private (page); + offset =swp_offset (entry); + +SetPageDirty (page); + disk->fops->swap_slot_free_notify (sis->bdev, + offset); + } +} +static void end_swap_bio_read (struct bio *bio) {struct page *page = bio->bi_io_vec[0 ].bv_page;@@ -81,49 +129,7 @@ static void end_swap_bio_read(struct bio *bio) }SetPageUptodate (page); - -/* -* There is no guarantee that the page is in swap cache - the software -* suspend code (at least) uses end_swap_bio_read() against a non- -* swapcache page. So we must check PG_swapcache before proceeding with -* this optimization. -*/ -if (likely (PageSwapCache (page))) { -struct swap_info_struct *sis; - - sis =page_swap_info (page); -if (sis->flags &SWP_BLKDEV ) { -/* -* The swap subsystem performs lazy swap slot freeing, -* expecting that the page will be swapped out again. -* So we can avoid an unnecessary write if the page -* isn't redirtied. -* This is good for real swap storage because we can -* reduce unnecessary I/O and enhance wear-leveling -* if an SSD is used as the as swap device. -* But if in-memory swap device (eg zram) is used, -* this causes a duplicated copy between uncompressed -* data in VM-owned memory and compressed data in -* zram-owned memory. So let's free zram-owned memory -* and make the VM-owned decompressed page *dirty*, -* so the page should be swapped out somewhere again if -* we again wish to reclaim it. -*/ -struct gendisk *disk = sis->bdev->bd_disk; -if (disk->fops->swap_slot_free_notify) { -swp_entry_t entry; -unsigned long offset; - - entry.val =page_private (page); - offset =swp_offset (entry); - -SetPageDirty (page); - disk->fops->swap_slot_free_notify (sis->bdev, - offset); - } - } - } - +swap_slot_free_notify (page);out:
unlock_page(page);bio_put(bio);mm/page_io.c +1
-1@@ -347,6 +353,7 @@ int swap_readpage(struct page *page) ret =bdev_read_page (sis->bdev,swap_page_sector (page), page);if (!ret) { +swap_slot_free_notify (page);count_vm_event (PSWPIN );return 0 ; } --Quoted 2 lines
1.9.1
Kyeongdon, Could you try this patch?
From
09497ba48f5621cd2737f72ac4d15e6b3e5e3d14Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Minchan Kim <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 23:08:14 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] mm: callswap_slot_free_notifywith holding page lockKyeongdon reported below error which is BUG_ON(!PageSwapCache(page)) in
page_swap_info.
The reason is thatpage_endioinrw_pageunlocks the page if read I/O is completed so we need to hold aPG_lockagain to check PageSwapCache. Otherwise, the page can be removed from swapcache and trigger belowBUG_ON.[27833.995833] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [27833.995853] Kernel BUG at c00f9040 [verbose debug info unavailable] [27833.995865] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ARM [27833.995876] Modules linked in: [27833.995892] CPU: 4 PID: 13446 Comm: RenderThread Tainted: G W 3.10.84-g9f14aec-dirty #73 [27833.995903] task: c3b73200 ti: dd192000 task.ti: dd192000 [27833.995922] PC is at page_swap_info+0x10/0x2c [27833.995934] LR is at swap_slot_free_notify+0x18/0x6c [27833.995946] pc : [<c00f9040>] lr : [<c00f5560>] psr: 400f0113 [27833.995946] sp : dd193d78 ip : c2deb1e4 fp : da015180 [27833.995959] r10: 00000000 r9 : 000200da r8 : c120fe08 [27833.995968] r7 : 00000000 r6 : 00000000 r5 : c249a6c0 r4 : = c249a6c0 [27833.995979] r3 : 00000000 r2 : 40080009 r1 : 200f0113 r0 : = c249a6c0 ..<snip> [27833.996273] [<c00f9040>] (page_swap_info+0x10/0x2c) from [<c00f5560>] (swap_slot_free_notify+0x18/0x6c) [27833.996288] [<c00f5560>] (swap_slot_free_notify+0x18/0x6c) from [<c00f5c5c>] (swap_readpage+0x90/0x11c) [27833.996302] [<c00f5c5c>] (swap_readpage+0x90/0x11c) from [<c00f62dc>] (read_swap_cache_async+0x134/0x1ac) [27833.996317] [<c00f62dc>] (read_swap_cache_async+0x134/0x1ac) from [<c00f63c4>] (swapin_readahead+0x70/0xb0) [27833.996334] [<c00f63c4>] (swapin_readahead+0x70/0xb0) from = [<c00e87e0>] (handle_pte_fault+0x320/0x6fc) [27833.996348] [<c00e87e0>] (handle_pte_fault+0x320/0x6fc) from [<c00e8c7c>] (handle_mm_fault+0xc0/0xf0) [27833.996363] [<c00e8c7c>] (handle_mm_fault+0xc0/0xf0) from = [<c001ac18>] (do_page_fault+0x11c/0x36c) [27833.996378] [<c001ac18>] (do_page_fault+0x11c/0x36c) from = [<c000838c>] (do_DataAbort+0x34/0x118) [27833.996392] [<c000838c>] (do_DataAbort+0x34/0x118) from [<c000d8b4>]
Quoted 4 lines
(
__dabt_usr+0x34/0x40)Reported-by Kyeongdon Kim <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Minchan Kim <[email protected]>
I tested this patch for 48 hours and can't reproduce the problem.
Thanks.