Anyone have a clone of wireless-legacy.git?

It has recently come to my attention that the old wireless-legacy.git tree is no longer available on kernel.org. I honestly have no idea what happened to it -- for all I know I fat-fingered it some time ago or whatever. Anyway, apparently there are some references in it "out there" and it would be good if we had a copy available somewhere public.

If you have an old clone of wireless-legacy.git, PLEASE DO NOT DELETE IT! Please let me know that you've got it and I will arrange to get a copy of it from you in order to make it available publicly again.

Quoted 11 lines · On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 14:38:04 -0400 "John W. Linville" <[email protected]>…

It has recently come to my attention that the old wireless- legacy.git
tree is no longer available on kernel.org.  I honestly have no idea what happened to it -- for all I know I fat-fingered it some time ago or whatever.  Anyway, apparently there are some references in it
"out there" and it would be good if we had a copy available somewhere
public.

Quoted 5 lines

If you have an old clone of wireless-legacy.git, PLEASE DO NOT DELETE
IT!  Please let me know that you've got it and I will arrange to get
a copy of it from you in order to make it available publicly again.

Before you do that please make sure you get multiple copies from unconnected sources and confirm none of them are trojanned.

Not really necessary - at least one commit ID in it is well documented:

https://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2007/ath5k-code-analysis.html

That might very well be one of the last commits in that tree.

Quoted 7 lines · On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 14:38:04 -0400 "John W. Linville" <[email protected]>…

It has recently come to my attention that the old wireless-legacy.git tree is no longer available on kernel.org. I honestly have no idea what happened to it -- for all I know I fat-fingered it some time ago or whatever. Anyway, apparently there are some references in it "out there" and it would be good if we had a copy available somewhere public.

Quoted 3 lines

If you have an old clone of wireless-legacy.git, PLEASE DO NOT DELETE IT! Please let me know that you've got it and I will arrange to get a copy of it from you in order to make it available publicly again.

Before you do that please make sure you get multiple copies from unconnected sources and confirm none of them are trojanned.

It has recently come to my attention that the old wireless-legacy.git tree is no longer available on kernel.org. I honestly have no idea what happened to it -- for all I know I fat-fingered it some time ago or whatever. Anyway, apparently there are some references in it "out there" and it would be good if we had a copy available somewhere public.

If you have an old clone of wireless-legacy.git, PLEASE DO NOT DELETE IT! Please let me know that you've got it and I will arrange to get a copy of it from you in order to make it available publicly again.

I appreciate your support!

http://www.filewatcher.com/_/?q=wireless-legacy.git, maybe ?

Quoted 7 lines · John W. Linville

It has recently come to my attention that the old wireless-legacy.git tree is no longer available on kernel.org. I honestly have no idea what happened to it -- for all I know I fat-fingered it some time ago or whatever. Anyway, apparently there are some references in it "out there" and it would be good if we had a copy available somewhere public.

Quoted 6 lines

If you have an old clone of wireless-legacy.git, PLEASE DO NOT DELETE IT! Please let me know that you've got it and I will arrange to get a copy of it from you in order to make it available publicly again.

I appreciate your support!

http://www.filewatcher.com/_/?q=wireless-legacy.git, maybe ?

Quoted 3 lines

http://www.filewatcher.com/_/?q=wireless-legacy.git, maybe ?

Seems to work - both have the same branches:

  adm8211                 72c942ed694e [PATCH] adm8211: fix build breakage from skb->mac.raw at76                    279f8592e428 cfg80211: keep track of supported interface modes (at76) ath5k                   8584ac94e3bb [PATCH] ath5k: Internalize Atheros Turbo modes ath5k-2008-01-21        5b8ca29e11b5 ath5k: remove duplicate bssid variable mac80211-attic          2bc68d999610 [PATCH] mac80211: remove scan struct from hostapd_param mac80211-dungeon        ad097a32e9ad [PATCH] mac80211 [HT] 802.11 code compiles under CONFIG_MAC80211_HT prism54usb              101e59f5e18a prism54usb: more fix for wireless Kconfig changes rtl8180-2008-01-21      55fc0e806a93 rtl8180: remove calibration error message for rtl8225z2 tiacx                   d6a6811c508b [PATCH] TI acx100/acx111: Make debug level selectable in configuration wireless-dev-2007-08-10 ca29ec8f05c1 Merge ../wireless-dev-legacy into wireless-dev-2007-08-10 wireless-dev-2007-09-24 cd799e167394 Merge branch 'p54' into everything

johannes

Quoted 18 lines · Johannes Berg

Quoted 3 lines

http://www.filewatcher.com/_/?q=wireless-legacy.git, maybe ?

Seems to work - both have the same branches:

  adm8211                 72c942ed694e [PATCH] adm8211: fix build breakage from skb->mac.raw at76                    279f8592e428 cfg80211: keep track of supported interface modes (at76) ath5k                   8584ac94e3bb [PATCH] ath5k: Internalize Atheros Turbo modes ath5k-2008-01-21        5b8ca29e11b5 ath5k: remove duplicate bssid variable mac80211-attic          2bc68d999610 [PATCH] mac80211: remove scan struct from hostapd_param mac80211-dungeon        ad097a32e9ad [PATCH] mac80211 [HT] 802.11 code compiles under CONFIG_MAC80211_HT prism54usb              101e59f5e18a prism54usb: more fix for wireless Kconfig changes rtl8180-2008-01-21      55fc0e806a93 rtl8180: remove calibration error message for rtl8225z2 tiacx                   d6a6811c508b [PATCH] TI acx100/acx111: Make debug level selectable in configuration wireless-dev-2007-08-10 ca29ec8f05c1 Merge ../wireless-dev-legacy into wireless-dev-2007-08-10 wireless-dev-2007-09-24 cd799e167394 Merge branch 'p54' into everything

Quoted 1 line

johannes

I got them both from the two FTP sites, and both git repos appear to be identical. It would be best if someone had an actual record of the commit hash values, but this might be the best I/we can do...?